User talk:Adw.x.hs

This is Adw.x.hs's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Christo Xavier (May 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by ToadetteEdit were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Christo Xavier and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ToadetteEdit (7M articles) 06:42, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Adw.x.hs! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ToadetteEdit (7M articles) 06:42, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

War 2 (2025)

Hi . I have marked the article War 2 (2025) you recently created as unsourced. In this state, it is unlikely to survive the new pages patrol and you should immediately add reliable sourcing. Note that WP:IMDb is not considered reliable as it is user-generated. See also WP:NFILM, as you need to demonstrate how this unreleased film is notable. Mike Turnbull (talk) 17:12, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

War 2 (2025) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to War 2 (2025). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CNMall41 (talk) 17:50, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

Hello! I'm The Sophocrat. I just wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to the page Vettam have been reverted because they appear to have added incorrect information. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source, discuss it on the article's talk page, or leave me a message on my talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. The cited article states "Dileep’s Vettam is a disaster at the box-office". That's not "moderate success". The Sophocrat (talk) 05:06, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image uploads

To date, you have uploaded five images to Commons that are all movie posters claiming they are your own work. This is false. These are copyrighted works. Simply because you found them on the Internet somewhere and downloaded them to your computer does not transfer the copyrights from the holder to you. If that were the case, then nobody would be able to hold copyright to anything; everyone would be free to copy anything in existence. I have tagged all five of these images are copyright violations on Commons and removed them from the articles where you placed them here. If you have questions about this, please let me know. Thanks, --Hammersoft (talk) 01:32, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Did you not read the above? Doing this reintroduces a copyright violation into the article. Would you please explain why you are doing this? --Hammersoft (talk) 03:12, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]