Jump to content

User talk:1591rn

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:ASFCEdits)

Welcome!

[edit]

Hi ASFCEdits! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Kj cheetham (talk) 19:31, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much. Can you please look into this account https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:LuCKY&action=view
This person is a talent manager in Turkey and he has been editing the pages of Turkish celebrities to solely add ugly pictures of them. Pls check all his edits. They are all the same. He removes old pictures and adds nasty ones of his choice. No celerity would want these on their wiki page. ASFCEdits (talk) 15:28, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

[edit]

Copyright problem icon Your edit to Aytaç Şaşmaz has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Please do not upload non-free images you found on the internet. And do not remove links of free images. You may raplace it if better one availabe. LuCkY talk 12:34, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You will be hearing from Aytaç’s management soon. ASFCEdits (talk) 15:22, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 16:01, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

[edit]

I have been blocked because User:LuCKY chooses to replace pictures of celebrities with ugly ones. I undo his edits but he insists on posting them again. If you check his edits you will notice that, that all he does. A celebrity would rather have no picture at all on their page than have ones posted for ulterior motives. I have created this account for the sole purpose of maintaining the wiki page of Aytac Sasmaz. I used to do it through IP publications and now I'm blocked.

As fans, we know this user from Instagram.

All I ask for is for you to check his account and see for yourselves. His actions can be described as vandalism.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

1591rn (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Decline reason:

You were replacing images compatible with Wikipedia's copyright and replacing them with images that are not. Your username also seems to suggest you have a connection to the subject of your edits. 331dot (talk) 18:03, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

1591rn (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

That's incorrect. I didn't replace them, I only removed bad pictures. You can check the history. That shouldn't get me permanently blocked. Did you even have a look at that account that kept on changing the pictures, not only on that page but all others. Everyone has connection to their edits otherwise why would I be editing something i have no knowledge of. All information I post is verified and properly cited, you can check for yourself.ASFCEdits (talk) 19:43, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You indicate you never replaced images, only removed bad pictures. I have verified you added a new, inappropriate, picture here and I have verified you have repeatedly removed an appropriately licensed image. You don't address your violation of WP:COPYRIGHT and you don't disclose the specific nature of your connection (WP:COI). Your claim that everyone has a connection (WP:COI) to their edits is simply not true and demonstrates you don't understand how Wikipedia works. Frankly, you will not be unblocked to write about Aytaç Şaşmaz. Yamla (talk) 19:56, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

1591rn (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

that was a month ago and once the pic was removed i never attempted to get it back. they removed my picture because it was from instagram as mentioned in the notes. although it was from the actor's instagram page. the picture that i removed today is from an instagram page as well: @yakinmenajerlik so how come this one doesn't break the rule? he just took a picture from that account and posted it. all his pics are from that account. how is he affiliated to that account? doesn't that break the rules?

my connection is that i'm a fan. ASFCEdits = Aytac Sasmaz Fan Club Edits.

so i'm not allowed to write about the thing that i have knowledge of? so we are supposed to write about things that we don't know about? i don't get you? so who populates all those pages in here? people with no knowledge about the subject? all information i post is verified and audited. ASFCEdits (talk) 20:11, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

"Keep me blocked" is sufficient. Regarding "professionalism", we're all volunteers here. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 16:13, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You gravely misunderstand WP:COI. It is not about personal knowledge. You seem to have a stronger connection to this individual than merely knowing about him. 331dot (talk) 20:43, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So you represent a fan club- this means you do indeed have a stronger interest in this person than a random person on the street. It also means you will need to propose a new username to rename this account to- group usernames are not permitted. 331dot (talk) 20:45, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I’m in no way COI. I’m not paid nor related in any possible way to aytac sasmaz nor any of his associates. Most probably he doesn’t even know i exist. I have read wp:coi and I don’t see any relevance. None of it applies to me. Also, all my contributions are objective and properly referenced and documented. All my edits are factual in nature and straightforward. Just because my username is what it is, it doesn’t mean i have to be blocked. First it was the picture and now it’s my username. ASFCEdits (talk) 20:59, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
DFO waves at il miglior fabbro -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 00:14, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Even if I accept this, you still need to rename this account. 331dot (talk) 00:33, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don’t have a problem renaming my account and will do so as soon as Im unblocked, if Im ever unblocked. ASFCEdits (talk) 03:23, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We can rename your account for you if you tell us what to rename it to. 331dot (talk) 08:40, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In my experience passionate fans are often hard to tell apart from people who are directly associated with a topic; because they are highly motivated to promote the topic for which they are a fan of and that often blinds them to our requirements. Maybe you don't have a COI, but you're editing as if you do as Yamla notes you won't be unblocked to edit about(in the short term, at least) this individual. I'm not ignoring the copyright issue- that is still a concern. Someone else will review your request, but I'm in agreement with Yamla. 331dot (talk) 08:44, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please rename my account to 1591rn if available.
if you have access to my ip, you’d be able to tell that im not even in turkey. I absolutely do not have a coi. I am an enthusiastic fan who appreciates aytac’s work and talent. My edits are all factual. I try my best to keep them simple and informative. As his fan, all i ever wanted is for his page to look professional and well populated. i will never apologize for that. I feel sorry for you and Yamla. You are unfortunately discouraging people with passion to contribute professionally to wiki.
i would love to see you investigate LuCKy the same way you are investigating me. I highly suspect he is affiliated to @yakinmenajerlik a talent manager that is the owner of the pictures he posts here. I know about that because he took that picture with aytac on the premiere of his series altin kafes. The same goes for hilmi (his co star). He specifically uses pictures from that instagram account here. He never uses any other source and he pushes so hard to get them published and nothing else. ASFCEdits (talk) 09:39, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Can you please look into my reply. If you have already established that I won’t be unblocked then can you at least remove the picture. Aytac has a movie premiere coming up soon and it’s unfair for him to have this pic on his profile where everyone will be checking. Also I think LuCKY deserves the same treatment that I have been treated. He engaged with the same violation and repeatedly reversed my edits and uploaded his picture. He could have simply reported me but he chose to push back every time. ASFCEdits (talk) 03:13, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There is such a thing as too much passion. As I said, it is hard for us to tell a passionate fan from someone with a COI, and they usually have the same editing habits. We aren't concerned with this individual's movie premieres. While blocked, you may not use this page to suggest edits, you only have access to it to discuss your block. You shouldn't be talking about others, see WP:NOTTHEM. A volunteer administrator will eventually review your request, please be patient. 331dot (talk) 10:16, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You have not addressed the reasons for your block. You will not be unblocked to write about something you are a fan of or with which you have an outside connection Please describe what you did to get blocked, whot you would do different, and what constructive edits you would make. "All content must be cited from reliable sources that are unconnected with the subject and have a reputation for fact checking." Please modify your open unblock request accordingly. Thanks. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:57, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Did you even check or read any of the above? Keep me blocked because I will not entertain your unprofessionalism. 1591rn (talk) 12:34, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]