User talk:ARandomName123

	; Archives (Index) ;
	2023; 2024; 2025;
	This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Question from Zucherama1234 (07:28, 2 December 2025)

Hello, how do I format a wikipediaedia article? I'm thinking about creating a article about a transgender short filmaker. --Zucherama1234 (talk) 07:28, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Zucherama1234: Hi, you can take a look at other film maker articles to see how to format it. Just make sure yours is notable, and that you cite reliable sources. Please take a look at Help:Introduction for an introduction to editing and how Wikipedia works. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 22:33, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Naibg ~2025-44015-46 (talk) 19:01, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Minor barnstar
	Thanks for that. Have a minor barnstar. Iljhgtn (talk) 22:07, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks :) ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 00:49, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Aviator Jr (16:21, 28 December 2025)

How to create a Category page? --Aviator Jr (talk) 16:21, 28 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Aviator Jr: You should be able to create it by simply creating a page titled "Category:name of category". It should fill up automatically when things are added to it. Please remember to add categories to the category if applicable, along with a description. See WP:CREATECAT for more info. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 19:28, 28 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Aviator Jr (talk) 19:08, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Simplyy Jamess (02:23, 31 December 2025)

Note: Simplyy Jamess's mentor Goldsztajn is away.

is https://en.soccerwiki.org/ a reliable source? --Simplyy Jamess (talk) 02:23, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Simplyy Jamess: No, wikis written by general users are not considered reliable sources. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 04:40, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Saadmk14 (13:33, 31 December 2025)

Hi, I am trying to submit a description about a media personality, scholar in Wikipedia. What would be my best way to do this as I just joined the platform in the last 3 days --Saadmk14 (talk) 13:33, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Saadmk14: Hi, please submit a draft of your article through Wikipedia:Articles for creation. Please make sure your person has received significant coverage in multiple independent and reliable sources. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 20:51, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Vitruvianpaths0122 (03:13, 1 January 2026)

As as direct descendant, I want to learn how to correctly edit Alexander C. Eschweiler's page. Can you direct me to the instructions for how to add verifiable sources? Thank you. --Vitruvianpaths0122 (talk) 03:13, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Vitruvianpaths0122: Hi, since you have a conflict of interest with the subject of the article, please follow the instructions listed at Wikipedia:Edit Request Wizard/COI to request a change. Generally, the person adding information is responsible for citing reliable sources. If you have a source, you can provide a link to it, or provide sufficient information such that another editor is able to locate a copy. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 03:43, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Also want to add that I don't consider it a "conflict of interest" if my. goal if verifiable accuracy. Vitruvianpaths0122 (talk) 03:51, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Mpho47 (13:35, 6 January 2026)

hi hope you are well, i'm looking to publisch my first wiki pedia page but not quite familiar with the process. --Mpho47 (talk) 13:36, 6 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

(talk-page stalker) Please read up on our policies and YFA before making your own article. shane (talk to me if you want!) 13:39, 6 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

URA scripts, continuously check for probably unref articles

Hello, and happy New Year. I wanted to float an idea that I've had kicking around my head for some while about automatically checking for probably unreferenced articles. The idea being that we continuously add to the backlog rather than do it aperiodically in big chunks having scanned all of mainspace. It goes something like:

collate a list of all pages in mainspace that were changed yesterday (or the day before yesterday)
run the "Is this missing references?" script across them, and add any for which the answer is yes to your set of "probably unreferenced article" pages.
I imagine this to be done whenever your true-up script runs, i.e. every day just after midnight.
It helps in situations where editors go on a "remove unreliable source X" spree without adding {{Unreferenced}} to articles that then have no references. E.g. the footballdatabase.eu one that happened in the middle of the last backlog drive.

I'd be grateful for your thoughts. Cheers, SunloungerFrog (talk) 09:07, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@SunloungerFrog: Happy new year to you too! Sure, that seems doable. I'll have to look into where I can get a list of pages edited in the past day though, as I'm sure there's a better way than running a continuous tracking script. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 15:51, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I think I can lash together a Quarry query to get recently edited pages, but probably tomorrow now. I'll revert when I have something. Cheers, SunloungerFrog (talk) 23:10, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

So I think that this Quarry query should give all articles whose last human (i.e. non-bot) edit was the day before yesterday. I chose the day before yesterday just to exclude articles that might be attracting a lot of edits. It takes about 70s to run, and returns about 47500 articles. Is that too many for your script to go through on a daily basis? Cheers, SunloungerFrog (talk) 09:15, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@SunloungerFrog: That's roughly similar to how much it goes through for User:ARandomName123/unref1-8 every day, so it should be fine. Would take somewhere between 1 and 2 hours. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 16:51, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

It would be instructive to do a couple of manual runs, just to see in practice how many probably unreferenced articles are turned up. It struck me that if you were to run it a couple of hours before midnight, that would reduce the numbers slightly too. Cheers, SunloungerFrog (talk) 17:03, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@SunloungerFrog: Would you prefer it be run before or after the true-up script? Also, PyWikiBot does not appear to have support for Quarry, so the SQL query would need to be run a different way. I'm leaning towards Superset as I have no experience with connecting to databases. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 02:32, 15 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose after the true-up script, to avoid working through problem pages twice? But it probably doesn't really matter. On the SQL front, can you just take the SQL from the Quarry query and then use this, i.e. the -mysqlquery parameter? Or I see that a PagePile can be used as an input, and PagePile can take a Quarry query ID as input. Or Superset looks good too, though I have never used it. Cheers, SunloungerFrog (talk) 05:40, 15 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@SunloungerFrog: -mysqlquery would require me connect to the database, which I have never done before (though if you'd like to help out, for this or in general, I can give you access to the Toolforge project where the code is hosted). Superset would probably be the simplest way for me, as it already has a dedicated pagegenerator, and wouldn't need to be passed to another service, like Quarry/PagePile. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 02:26, 16 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm... now that I've looked at the docs, the setup for the mysqlquery doesn't look that hard. I'll try that one out first. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 03:03, 16 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@SunloungerFrog: Are you able to adjust the SQL query so that redirects are filtered out? And I'm assuming all pages listed are unique? ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 22:19, 18 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

OK, done that, needed a AND page_is_redirect = 0 in there too. And yes, I think it should be unique pages. Cheers, SunloungerFrog (talk) 23:08, 18 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@SunloungerFrog: Up and running at User:ARandomName123/unref8. The previously listed pages there were moved to unref7. Since it has been a while since I scanned through all articles, most, if not all, of the articles on the list are there because they were previously unsourced, and then edited, not because they were newly unsourced.

I added it to the same program that does the true-up run (22:00), so it should run immediately after it (~23:00). It took an hour and twenty minutes, which is longer than I expected but probably due to the 50k articles it needed to scan through. I also ended up removing page_id and rev_timestamp from SELECT in the query, as only namespace and title are valid outputs. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 04:10, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

That looks great. It is heartening to see that the percentage of probably unreffed articles in that batch (36/48437 = 0.074%) is an order of magnitude less than the percentage of unreffed + probably unreffed articles in the whole encyclopedia (69182/7124018 = 0.971%) so we're not going to be adding loads of new articles to the probably unreffed backlog each time, and the total number (< 70,000) is probably not too far off the mark. And I think if we keep trickling it in like this, we will keep on top of it all. Will this run each night now? Thanks for doing all the hard work with the script / bot! Cheers, SunloungerFrog (talk) 09:24, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@SunloungerFrog: Yes, it will run every night. Not sure if you noticed but some stats were in the edit summary, most notably the 150 articles detected. Once duplicates were removed, that dropped to 36 which means ~75% of articles fulfilling the currently likely unreferenced criteria are already listed. This is a pretty smart way of keeping up to date on these articles (I'd planned to at one point do monthly/weekly runs through all 7m articles), so kudos to you for coming up with it! ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 14:04, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I hadn't seen the edit summaries, but they are great. Well, well done us for getting this up and running - I think it will keep the project on a good track. Now I am going to try and figure out how to write a Lua module to do some adding up on c:Data:URAstats_Data.tab so as to be able to display the current totals on the main project page. Cheers, SunloungerFrog (talk) 15:46, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good! ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 16:43, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Check out Wikipedia:WikiProject Unreferenced articles/Progress, underneath the chart. Quite happy with that. Cheers, SunloungerFrog (talk) 00:57, 20 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Looks great, especially the change since previous day. Thanks for creating it! ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 06:04, 20 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Homepeople (10:16, 15 January 2026)

where do i see the post i did --Homepeople (talk) 10:16, 15 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Homepeople: Hi, you can see the list of your edits at Special:Contributions/Homepeople. It appears the only other page you have edited is your userpage, at User:Homepeople. On a side note, please do not use Wikipedia to advertise companies or their services. Thanks, ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 02:19, 16 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Aviator Jr (13:45, 16 January 2026)

How to nominate an article for the Good Article category? --Aviator Jr (talk) 13:45, 16 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Aviator Jr: Hi, apologies for the late reply. Please first review Wikipedia:Good article criteria and ensure your article meets the requirements. You can then install User:SD0001/GAN-helper, and click on the GAN button in the tools dropdown menu. Alternatively, follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Good article instructions. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 04:12, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

It's alright I saw it late too. Thanks for helping out. Aviator Jr (talk) 01:56, 22 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Terrylantz (04:26, 21 January 2026)

How do I add information to my own wiki page --Terrylantz (talk) 04:26, 21 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Terrylantz: Hi, do you mean your user page (User:Terrylantz), a currently existing article about you, or are you looking to create an article on you? ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 03:26, 22 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

yes to create my own since i am mentioned in other people's pages but my hyperlink is red with no information ~2026-46951-0 (talk) 03:29, 22 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Terrylantz: Have you been covered in multiple reliable sources, for example, news articles? ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 03:58, 22 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Indian Wordsmith (07:46, 22 January 2026)

Hello Mentor,

I’ve added a paragraph along with a citation to the Wikipedia page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Music_Lovers_Records.

“All eight records were released together as a single collection, organized into themed series such as Operatic Songs, Old-Time Songs, Hymns, Irish Songs, Novelty, and Popular Song & Dance, featuring popular music from the 1920s.”

Could you please review this and let me know if it is accurate? I would appreciate your suggestions if any changes are needed.

Thanks --Indian Wordsmith (talk) 07:46, 22 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Indian Wordsmith: Hi, and thanks for your edit! I feel All the eight records as a single release doesn't sound grammatically correct. Also, please include a page number for large PDFs, and if the preceding sentence is not supported by the source, you can indicate it with a {{citation needed}} tag. I've added {{reflist}} to the bottom of the page to display the reference section properly. Cheers, ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 05:07, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Question from KID2808 (20:03, 24 January 2026)

Yo ! I just moved my sandbox to the main page but i have heard i should have done that when my account as like a week old

Do you think it will create any problem? --KID2808 (talk) 20:03, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@KID2808: Hi, I don't believe you've moved your sandbox to mainspace yet, assuming the article you created was User:KID2808/sandbox? Submitting it as you did is the correct way to do it, so there aren't any issues on that end. Cheers, ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 02:51, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Marcocanova83 (19:51, 25 January 2026)

Marco Canova and Tom Dyer are the authors and copyright holders of the Flair Bartending Book. The project took approximately four years to research, write, and complete. During production, a ghostwriter was hired under a written contract. The contractual role was to assist with writing and drafting, but not to own, retain, or exploit any rights associated with the final work.

Under the contract, all copyright and exploitation rights were assigned to Marco Canova and Tom Dyer. As a result, the ghostwriter does not hold any ownership, co-authorship, or publication rights to the book. The involvement was contractual and does not confer authorship, licensing, or commercial rights to the book’s content or distribution.

The book has now been published, and Marco Canova and Tom Dyer are the sole authors and rights holders. The contract governing these rights was signed by all parties and is legally binding.

--Marcocanova83 (talk) 19:51, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

We also wish to create a page of this historical book on wiki - we have many references to support and the fact that this manuscript sold in 28

countries and is the only book about the history of flair bartending that was ever written ? Marcocanova83 (talk) 19:54, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Marcocanova83: Hi, the criteria for book articles is at least two pieces of coverage of non-trivial length in reliable and independent sources. For example, book reviews. Has the book been reviewed anywhere yet? ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 02:53, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Buffythevampslyr (13:33, 26 January 2026)

Hello! I created my first draft but I spelled the person's name wrong in the draft title and can't figure out how to fix it. Help! --Buffythevampslyr (talk) 13:33, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Buffythevampslyr: Hi, you need 10 edits to move pages; you currently have 5. Once you hit 10, there should be an option to "Move" under the tools menu. Click on it, and enter your desired title. Alternatively, let me know what the correct name is, and I can help move it for you. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 03:58, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Amazing! I'm going to keep working to hit my edits :) but if you wouldn't mind (it is driving me crazy!) The correct name is: Emma Törzs. Buffythevampslyr (talk) 12:52, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Done ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 20:47, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much, you are amazing. I have another question. I got feedback that the draft didn't meet notability standards; that the book itself is notable but not the author. I can't figure out, from reading the notability guidelines, how that is the case. I thought if a book were considered notable the author would also be. Is that not the case? Buffythevampslyr (talk) 21:55, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Buffythevampslyr: I'm assuming you're referring to the third criteria at the notability criteria for authors? You could try asking the reviewer on their talk page, but I will note that meeting any of those criteria does not guarantee an article is necessary. In my experience, editors would like to see more than a single notable book, or additional coverage of the author herself. You are also welcome to write an article on the book, which easily passes the notability criteria. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 22:50, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Disdoris on Westville (Georgia) (11:20, 27 January 2026)

Hello, struggling to know how to edit at all! But have found item in 3rd para under Lumpkin site that needs part deletion and re-phrasing where reference is made to 'dinner at the Singers' home'. No explanation of who are the Singers! So I would delete the first part of this but don't know how to. --Disdoris (talk) 11:20, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Disdoris: There should be an edit button at the top of the article. Just click that, and edit what you'd like. If that doesn't work, try this link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westville_(Georgia)#/editor/0 ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 20:52, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Will do. Disdoris (talk) 22:07, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar of thanks

		The Thank You Barnstar
		Just wanted to share a message of thanks! I believe I've been with the Wikipedia:WikiProject Unreferenced articles for at least a couple years now and I'm always impressed by your dedication to the effort and consistently improving your tools. Keep it up! Your work is truly inspiring!

--Engineerchange (talk) 13:05, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks :) ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 20:52, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Aviator Jr (13:37, 28 January 2026)

I think the article Project 17B-class frigate has not been reviewed yet. Can you confirm? --Aviator Jr (talk) 13:37, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Aviator Jr: It was reviewed last year September by Noorullah21. See page logs here. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 18:20, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

But the article is not rated at Start, B, C class yet. Does this imply something? Just curious. Can I nominate it for good article? Aviator Jr (talk) 06:08, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Aviator Jr: The rating on the talk page isn't strictly defined (other than GA/FAs). You are welcome to create the talk page and set the rating yourself. Please review the good article criteria first, along with other good articles in the same topic area. If you believe your article is about the same quality, and meets the criteria, you can nominate it if you'd like. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 01:10, 30 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. Thanks. Aviator Jr (talk) 03:14, 30 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Yaw fit muzic (22:51, 28 January 2026)

How can u edit an article ? --Yaw fit muzic (talk) 22:51, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Yaw fit muzic: Hi, there should be an "Edit" button at the top right of the article. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 01:11, 30 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Disdoris on User:Disdoris/sandbox (18:17, 29 January 2026)

Page title: David Wangerin I have formatted a page for this in my sandbox as much as I can without further help/advice. It includes links and citations. Citations for the 2 books mentioned are in 1st para, and I'm not sure if these might be more appropriate when books are listed later under 'Writing Career'. Can you advise on this and any other improvements I can make. Thanks --Disdoris (talk) 18:17, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Disdoris: Hi, please add sources to prove his notability. That is, independent and reliable sources that provide significant coverage on the article subject. Biographies that only cite the subject are not likely to be accepted. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 01:13, 30 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I understand well that notability is an absolute requirement but have really got a bit stumped by how to provide evidence of this.

I do notice that in Wikipedia's own History of Soccer in the United States there are 11 references to the book Soccer in a Football World https://archive.org/details/soccerinfootball0000wang dealing with the history of US soccer from 1685 to the early 1900s, indicating that this early history of the game is heavily reliant on the subject's book as its foundation. Does not that indicate some notability for the author?

There exist a number of very complementary book reviews, such as this next link, but I'm not sure how to incorporate this and whether it would be regarded as independent and reliable The best book on American soccer (It is an Amazon review but is by Roger Allaway, a historian also much referenced in Wikipedia's own History of Soccer in the United States).

Thanks Disdoris (talk) 23:36, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Disdoris: If the book itself has been reviewed multiple times, then you can create an article on the book. Please note Amazon reviews are not considered reliable sources. One in a journal or a newspaper would be preferred. As for Wangerin, the notability guideline says that he must have created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work. In addition, such work must have been the primary subject of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews, so it is possible he may be notable under that criteria. However, in my experience reviewers would like to see more than one notable book. You may submit the article by adding {{subst:submit}} if you'd like a second opinion. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 10:28, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a few additions and further edits - though they are negligible in nature. I have struggled to find book reviews that would seem to qualify in the way you describe to support notability. When I have tried to link some of those that do seem appropriate, they appear in the text with the full http title, which seems unsuitable. I would like to do as you suggest and please submit for a second opinion. I have added {{AfC submission|||ts=20260212173157|u=Disdoris|ns=3}} at top of my article as directed, but would like to be confident this is correct to route me for a second opinion. Could you please confirm or direct me. Disdoris (talk) 17:31, 12 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Disdoris: Normally, adding the tag is the first opinion, but since you've asked me to evaluate the article, I guess it then becomes a second opinion. Feel free to add {{subst:submit}} to the top of your page. As for referencing issues, please take a look at Help:Introduction to referencing with VisualEditor/2. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 03:03, 13 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, I don't understand your first sentence there and am now confused re your or another's first and second opinions. You'll notice I already added {{subst:submit}} trying to follow your earlier direction "if you'd like a second opinion." What does that bracketed term mean? This leaves me unsure of the status of my article. I'd like to have chance to improve it and wonder if is there a time limit on how long it can remain in Sandbox to attempt this. I am disinclined to submit it just yet to a further level where it might well be deleted. Thanks. Disdoris (talk) 17:33, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Disdoris: Sorry about the confusion on that first sentence, you can safely ignore it.

As for your adrticle, it doesn't look like you've added {{subst:submit}} to User:Disdoris/sandbox. If by bracketed term, you're referring to subst:submit, then it's a template that should add a big yellow box to the top of your submission. If you're talking about <nowiki, then it's used to type the syntax for the yellow box template, without actually having the template generated. The time limit for drafts is six months after the last edit.

If you're having issues with the submission, I can add it for you if needed. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 23:21, 16 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I was referring to subst:submit which I had already added above article's name - I presume not the correct place since no yellow box appeared! Thanks for clarifying time limit for drafts and for offer of help with submission. I am still concerned that if I take it to this next stage, that it could be refused to the point where it is deleted, or is this a process where the article is reviewed and returns to me with feedback for improvement? Would appreciate if you clarify this for me. Thanks. Disdoris (talk) 12:36, 18 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Disdoris: The most common two results from the submission process are that it gets accepted or declined. If it gets accepted, it gets moved to mainspace (where the article are). If it gets declined, you will receive a message with reviewer feedback. You are welcome to improve it, and resubmit it again. In my experience, unless your submission is a copyright violation, attacking someone, or a hoax, it is very unlikely it will be refused to the point it is deleted. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 23:16, 18 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much for this - it makes things much clearer. I am planning to make additions if I can find more material, so may well call upon your help for the submission process when I am ready. Thanks. Disdoris (talk) 21:19, 20 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Eaprestons6l on 2026 NHRA Mission Foods Drag Racing Series (21:19, 29 January 2026)

Have an 85 Sonoma I I can drive to anyone for sale --Eaprestons6l (talk) 21:19, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Eaprestons6l on 2026 NHRA Mission Foods Drag Racing Series (21:20, 29 January 2026)

Hello --Eaprestons6l (talk) 21:20, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Eaprestons6l: Hi! If you have any Wikipedia-related questions, I can help. I can't help with your 85 Sonoma unfortunately. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 01:14, 30 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Question from ILAB&GC (16:36, 30 January 2026)

Hi ARandomName123, My name is Graham Cooper. Have opened a wiki account with the sole purpose of adding/correcting information about my deceased partner, the Maltese artist Isabelle Borg (1959-2010) see IsabelleBorg.com. Last year, I attempted to contact Wikipedia about adding/correcting info about Isabelle, was given a Wikipedia Appeal Key, but since then have not been able to find how/where to enter it ... I'm now seventy-one, and feel the need to get things done before it is too late ! Regards Graham. --ILAB&GC (talk) 16:36, 30 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@ILAB&GC: Hi Graham, can you please describe what should be added, and/or what is currently incorrect on Isabelle Borg's article? Please include reliable sources if possible. As for the Wikipedia Appeal Key, it is used in block appeals, but I'm not sure why you would have received one just for contacting Wikipedia. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 00:17, 31 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ARandomName123,

Thank you for taking the time to respond and help with the rectification of omission.

There is no mention of Isabelle Borg’s exhibition collaborations with other artists.

Hope the following, sourced from IsabelleBorg.com, referencing contemporaneous publications, is sufficient.

Isabelle Borg worked in collaboration, creating and exhibiting with the following artists;

Joe Friggieri, poet (once)

Ebba Von Fersen-Balzan, artist (twice)

Graham Cooper, photographer (thrice)

Collaboration - One Landscape Two Visions.

Paintings and Drawings by Isabelle Borg and Ebba Von Fersen-Balzan.

National Museum of Fine Arts, Valletta, Malta. 9th-27th March, 1991.

( http://www.isabelleborg.com/0000_ExhibitionPages/1991_OLTV_iS_Ebba01.html )

Collaboration - Austellung.

Paintings and Drawings by Isabelle Borg and Ebba Von Fersen-Balzan.

Old University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. 27th October - 8th November, 1992.

( http://www.isabelleborg.com/0000_ExhibitionPages/1992_iSandEbbaExhibit.html )

Collaboration - Mitt Hajku.

Collaboration - Book of poems by Joe Friggieri, with paintings and illustrations by Isabelle Borg.

Ciappetti Tea Rooms and Art Gallery, Mdina, Malta, 1997.

( http://www.isabelleborg.com/0000_ExhibitionPages/1997_MittHajku_01.html )

Collaboration - Two Islands. (v1 - 2002).

Irish & Maltese landscape, paintings by Isabelle Borg, landscape photography by Graham Cooper.

On the inauguration of the consular Offices of Malta in Dublin

The Bank of Ireland Arts Centre, Dublin, Ireland. 17th July 2002

( http://www.isabelleborg.com/0000_ExhibitionPages/2002_Dublin2is01.html )

Collaboration - Two Islands. (v2 - 2004).

Irish & Maltese landscape, paintings by Isabelle Borg, landscape photography by Graham Cooper.

St James Cavalier, Centre for Creativity, Valletta, Malta. 18th June - 18th July, 2004

( http://www.isabelleborg.com/0000_ExhibitionPages/2004_StJC2is_01.html )

Collaboration - Maltese Landscape.

Maltese landscape, paintings by Isabelle Borg, landscape photography by Graham Cooper.

Floriana Council, Floriana, Malta 2007.

( http://www.isabelleborg.com/0000_NewsEventContactPages/2007_FlorianaKLexhib1.html )

Regards & Thanks !

Graham ~2026-74542-9 (talk) 10:49, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@ILAB&GC or ~2026-74542-9: I noticed you had a newspaper clipping in a few of those links, which is great. Do you have clippings for any of the other ones? On a side note, I noticed there was no image of Isabelle Borg on her article. Would you be willing to donate an image of her for use on her page? Thanks, ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 03:04, 4 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Also, just to confirm, the newspaper in the clippings is The Sunday Times of Malta, not the British The Sunday Times? ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 03:10, 4 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

cite issue

I just added the 2020 population of Seabeck, Washington, and cited the URL of the Census Bureau page where I got it. But I didn't do it right. Not sure what I did wrong. The URL is https://data.census.gov/profile/Seabeck_CDP,_Washington?g=160XX00US5362120 ... can you fix it or tell me how to? --LelandRoss (talk) 22:31, 30 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@LelandRoss: Hi, the {{cite web}} citation template has a number of parameters that need to be filled in. For example, a typical blank template would look like this:

{{cite web |date= |title= |url= |website= |location= |publisher= |access-date=}}

. To use the census as a reference, simply fill in the template with the information where possible. In this case,

{{cite web |date= 2020 |title= Seabeck CDP, Washington |url= https://data.census.gov/profile/Seabeck_CDP,_Washington?g=160XX00US5362120 |website= United States Census Bureau |location= |publisher= United States Government |access-date= January 30, 2026}}

. I've fixed the one you added to the Seabeck, Washington page. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 00:34, 31 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Awi1mex (15:34, 1 February 2026)

Hi! How old are you and what is your gender? --Awi1mex (talk) 15:34, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Awi1mex: Hi! I would prefer to keep my personal information private, so the most I'll say is that I'm currently a university student. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 17:49, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

January–February 2026 NPP drive - Phase 2

Welcome to Phase 2 of the January–February 2026 NPP drive. During Phase 1, we reviewed 16,658 articles and 4,416 redirects, and there is currently a backlog of 16,475 articles and 23,782 redirects in the queue. Fantastic job! Completing 22,502 patrols in the first phase made a significant dent in the backlog. Let's keep our foot on the gas for Phase 2, and I hope we can achieve even more reviews than Phase 1. Best of luck!

Start patrolling!

You are receiving this message because you added your name to the participants list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:21, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Buricoman99 (16:58, 4 February 2026)

How to prepare fugu fish? --Buricoman99 (talk) 16:58, 4 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Holmes B H. Science and Fantasy

I've added an email address to my account, you can now use special:emailuser. sapphaline (talk) 15:24, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Sapphaline: Hi, please send me an email through special:emailuser. I can't attach a PDF through that unless it's as a reply to an email you sent. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 01:36, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Done. sapphaline (talk) 07:18, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Sapphaline:

Sent ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 08:16, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

~~There doesn't seem to be anything in my inbox. Could you send it again?~~ sapphaline (talk) 08:28, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Received it. sapphaline (talk) 08:47, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Siyama bature (16:00, 5 February 2026)

Hello I’m a physiotherapy student. I want you to help me with my studies --Siyama bature (talk) 16:00, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Siyama bature: Hi, unfortunately, I can only help with Wikipedia-related questions. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 01:37, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations

Welcome to the 20,000 edit club! Bearian (talk) 02:29, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, didn't realize I'd passed it with that edit. That's quite a lot :) Thanks! ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 05:07, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

More SF mags?

Thanks for the sources - all used :) As I am trying to wrap The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction, would you happen to be able to find [1] (review on p.116)? As well as the relevant reviews in [2] and [3]? _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:07, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I'll have to ask the librarians, but based on the catalogue, they only seem to have some unknown number of issues of Nova Express. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 08:24, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Piotrus:

Sent Science Fiction Eye and Nova Express articles. Unfortunately, the library does not hold issues of The Zone. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 21:35, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You are awesome :) Any ideas how to get The Zone (other than posting in Resource Exchange or contacting its editors etc. if I can ID them)? _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 01:12, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

No clue. Maybe see if WorldCat shows any libraries holding it? Though some libraries don't have their entire collections catalogued. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 10:15, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Rustic Quize (03:52, 7 February 2026)

I am new to wiki can you tell me the basics --Rustic Quize (talk) 03:52, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Rustic Quize: Hi, please see Help:Introduction. In short, click the edit button on the top right to begin editing. When prompted, you can choose the Visual Editor for an easier time editing. Create internal links with [[, and add references using the cite button at the top. Please remember to write in a neutral tone, with new content supported by reliable sources. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 10:13, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Question from PanZWarzywniaka (21:19, 7 February 2026)

Hi, I am authoring my first article and here is my first article draft. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Antoni_Dudek Do you think its ready for a review? --PanZWarzywniaka (talk) 21:19, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@PanZWarzywniaka: Hi, please make sure the content is verifiable through reliable sources. For example, the sources don't seem to confirm his birthdate of "17 October". In addition please review the notability guideline on professors, and ensure he meets at least one of them. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 10:22, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your feedback, I looked at the WP:NACADEMIC and I believe he meets criteria 1., 6. and 7.

I've included a reference for his DOB, and a note about being a popular pop science Youtuber. His polish Wikipedia page is much more elaborate, so if the article gets accepted, I'll add a note if you want to expand this section translate from Polish

Best PanZWarzywniaka (talk) 16:26, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) Pl wiki considers him notable due to habilitation, which is sufficient for pl wiki but not en wiki. Looking at the draft I find it dubious if he passes NAC 1, 6 or 7 (I don't see any awards or other recognition for his activities mentioned in the article, nor any SIGCOV media or academic appreciation of his work), but I always believe it's best to publish and article first and then see what happens at AfD, rather than rely on the judgement of a single person. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:08, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Buricoman99 (15:45, 11 February 2026)

Hi, I need help on how to source and prepare fugu fish --Buricoman99 (talk) 15:45, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Buricoman99: Hi, I can't help you with that, unfortunately. I can only help with Wikipedia-related questions. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 02:58, 13 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Mkfih3r (11:44, 13 February 2026)

Hello! I am a new editor on Wikipedia and I want to contribute in cybersecurity-related topics such as ethical hacking, bug bounty, and penetration testing.

Could you please guide me on: 1) How to properly add reliable references and citations? 2) What are the rules to avoid self-promotion or conflict of interest? 3) Any beginner-friendly tasks or articles I can start editing?

Thank you for your support! --Mkfih3r (talk) 11:44, 13 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Mkfih3r: Hi! For 1), there should be a button that says "Cite" at the top of the page when you are in editing mode. Add a citation after a new sentence, or as needed. Please take a look at Help:Referencing for beginners for further information.

As for 2, the guideline is that you should not directly edit articles relating to yourself, family, friends, clients, employers or other relationships. Instead, you need to create an edit request, where you can propose changes with reliable sources, and a different editor will review them and decide whether to implement them or not. Using Wikipedia for self-promotion is prohibited.

To get started editing, try the example tasks at Special:Homepage, which can be sorted by topic. Alternatively, you can check out WikiProjects related to your interests, for example, Wikipedia:WikiProject Computing. Wikipedia:Task Center also has some tasks to do, for example, copyediting, fact checking, or reference adding. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 08:59, 14 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Daruishsabri (17:29, 15 February 2026)

Hi how come there is no page on Shahzadeh Sereen his Persian Wikipedia is شاهزاده سرین --Daruishsabri (talk) 17:29, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Daruishsabri: Hi, since Wikipedia is written by volunteer editors, articles are written whenever an editor decides to. The reason Shahzadeh Sereen has no article may simply be because no one on the English Wikipedia has decided to write an article yet. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 23:23, 16 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Aviator Jr (05:10, 16 February 2026)

What is the use of "anchor" template? --Aviator Jr (talk) 05:11, 16 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Aviator Jr: Anchors are used to direct to a specific part of a page. For example, the link Help:Link#Anchors uses the anchor #Anchors to direct you to the part of the page under the heading Anchors. They are automatically generated using headings/subheadings, and can be manually added using the {{anchor}}. Since renaming a heading will rename the automatically generated anchor, links pointing to the old anchor will no longer work. The anchor template can be used to readd the old anchor invisibly. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 23:26, 16 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Wow you have quite the Talk page

Patience of a saint. Are we on track for an edit counting tool? Do we know enough about the tool we are likely using to update the Newsletter copy? Cielquiparle (talk) 19:27, 16 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Cielquiparle: I was thinking we just use the edit summary tool, since we used that prior to the hashtag tool, and so we should have the code already written somewhere. It's currently reading week for me, so I have ample time and we are on track. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 23:27, 16 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Great. Just updated the newsletter with the original copy and link regarding the edit summary tool. Is the newsletter now good to go? Cielquiparle (talk) 14:51, 18 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Cielquiparle: I will probably set the tool to search for just "MAR26", so the brackets and WP: part aren't strictly necessary. However, feel free to leave it as a way to promote the drive. The newsletter looks good to me. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 23:50, 18 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Ggriffin11 (17:09, 17 February 2026)

Hi, I was wondering if you know how long it usually takes to get a COI request reviewed? --Ggriffin11 (talk) 17:09, 17 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Ggriffin11: Probably a month or more, given the 370 total requests currently in the queue. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 17:48, 17 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Naturevalley87 (04:27, 18 February 2026)

how can I block someone from editing a page and removing my additions? --Naturevalley87 (talk) 04:27, 18 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Naturevalley87: You should first contact the editor, and see what their concerns are. If the concerns are valid, please discuss with them and try to correct your additions. If they are not valid, you can warn them for edit warring, for example through the template {{uw-ew}}. If they have reverted your additions more than three times in 24 hours, you can report them to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Please keep in mind the three revert limit applies to you as well. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 23:22, 18 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced articles March 2026 backlog drive

WikiProject Unreferenced articles | March 2026 Backlog Drive

There is a substantial backlog of unsourced articles on Wikipedia, and we need your help! The purpose of this drive is to add sources to these unsourced articles and make a meaningful impact.

Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles cited.
Remember to tag your edit summary with [[WP:MAR26]], both to advertise the event and tally the points later using Edit Summary Search.
Interested in taking part? Sign up here.

You're receiving this message because you have subscribed to the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:13, 19 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Tinadeb (17:31, 20 February 2026)

Hi. I found a libelous entry in a bio on Wikipedia. What is the fastest way for me to remove it? --Tinadeb (talk) 17:31, 20 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Tinadeb: Click the edit button at the top of the page and delete the libelous text. Next, send an email to oversight-en-wp@wikipedia.org so it can be removed from the page history. If you are unable to do so, please send me an email using Special:EmailUser/ARandomName123. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 18:32, 20 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Question from HogwashGold on Phoenix New Town (20:52, 22 February 2026)

hey! so after some digging and a brief interaction online with someone who said they're a resident of phoenix new town, i can't seem to pin anything down except to say that it's a mostly residential neighborhood that's likely pretty upscale. there could be room to mention the earthquake and the fact that the city was almost entirely destroyed. anyway -- all to say, i would recommend just deleting the whole economy section. but that felt like a dramatic edit, so wanted to run it by you first! --HogwashGold (talk) 20:52, 22 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]