User talk:ALittleClass

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, ALittleClass! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

If you have questions, just use this link to ask for help; a volunteer will visit you here shortly!

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! QuicoleJR (talk) 17:35, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

How do you propely format a request to add/delete in the vital articles? (with the support/oppose/neutral sections)? Is there a way to do this automatically, or do you just do this manually? ALittleClass (talk) 20:15, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for not noticing this earlier. The formatting has to be done by hand. To make it appear correctly, you simply put a semicolon (;) in front of each section header on a new line. If done correctly, it should look

like this

Hope this helps! QuicoleJR (talk) 18:03, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with... How do you properly format a request to add/delete in the vital articles? (with the support/oppose/neutral sections)? Is there a way to do this automatically, or do you just do this manually? ALittleClass (talk) 05:49, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not very familiar with that specific process, but after a quick look, it doesn't look like there is an automated way to create these requests and is probably done by hand each time. If you think it would be helpful, you could always propose a formalized structure on the general talk page about vital articles. cyberdog958^Talk 07:47, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Auntea Jenny has been accepted

Auntea Jenny, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sophisticatedevening🍷^(talk) 17:54, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

India FAR

I have nominated India for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. JDiala (talk) 08:25, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured article review/India/archive4

Hey! Adding to JDiala's comment. I noticed you've been leaving some great suggestions on improving the India article. It would be a huge help if you could also share your input at Wikipedia:Featured article review/India/archive4. Your contributions there would be immensely valuable in shaping the Featured Article Review process. Rackaballa (talk) 00:41, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Rackaballa I have posted my concerns with the article on the original FAR. So far I see mixed support from people outside the original talk, so it's uncertain whether it will actually continue to FARC. In the meantime, I think the best case scenario is improving the article until most people no longer have concerns with the FA rating.

Could you give any input on what you think of my proposal for reworking the culture section, or any alternate plans you would consider? I alone will not be able to accomplish everything listed on there, but with a group effort I believe the changes could be achieved in a short time. ALittleClass (talk) 16:50, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]