Jump to content

User talk:ACMehta

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hi ACMehta! I noticed your contributions to Commonwealth Bank and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Qwerty123M (talk) 12:54, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello ACMehta, and welcome to Wikipedia! I'm @Gvihar, your guide. Before you begin, please keep these core policies in mind:

  • Verifiability (WP:V): Always cite reliable, published sources for any facts you add.
  • Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV): Write in a balanced, unbiased tone—avoid taking sides.
  • No original research (WP:OR): Only include information that's already been published elsewhere.
  • Civility (WP:CIVIL): Be respectful and assume good faith when interacting with other editors.

Gvihar 19:10, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Gvihar okaay, I got you. But my edit at Ishwak Singh was valid as I only removed the red-link (non existent link) which was put at Mitti web series. How is it wrong? Can you please explain me. ACMehta (talk) 19:19, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not remove red links; they help in creating new pages in the future. Gvihar 19:27, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Gvihar okay Gvihar ACMehta (talk) 19:31, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

August 2025

[edit]

Stop icon Your recent editing history at Turkish Airlines shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
I’m posting this here as I have also posted it on the other editor’s talk page. Please discuss changes instead of reverting back and forth. Danners430 tweaks made 08:24, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Danners430 Heyy, I didn't revert it again and I wouldn't do that in future also (infact, I knew about it now that my edits were reverted after you mentioned it here) and nor I'm interested in starting an edit war. I'll not edit that pages again. ThankYOU@Danners430 user. ACMehta (talk) 14:44, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It’s all good - I posted the notice here purely in the spirit of fairness, as I placed it on the other party’s talk page too to try and get them to discuss on talk pages. Danners430 tweaks made 15:06, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Danners430 Ohhh..!! ThankYOU anyways Danners430. ACMehta (talk) 15:41, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2025–26 AIFF Super Cup, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2025 Indian Super Cup. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@DPL bot Heyy, it was a minor mistake there from my end in linking article, but I've fixed it now and put the relevant link. ThankYOU. 🤔 Did I just reply to a bot hurriedly, thinking as if it was another user? YES I DID... Phew! 😅 🤣 ACMehta (talk) 07:59, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]