User talk:97.106.148.231

January 2025

Please refrain from using talk pages for general discussion of this or other topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See the talk page guidelines for more information. Thank you. YBSOne (talk) 08:09, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not contact me again. I don't know how you're sending messages to my IP. I will consider further unwanted contact harassment. 97.106.148.231 (talk) 05:17, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Others have posted messages to your talk page before the above and you didn't complain. Even IPs have WP:User talk pages Doug Weller talk 08:28, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That was not an invitation to continue to message me. (Personal attack removed) 97.106.148.231 (talk) 14:19, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 08:33, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

97.106.148.231 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

See history of blocks97.106.148.231 (talk) 05:16, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you:
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. 331dot (talk) 09:01, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

(Non-administrator comment) Hi, this is very much not a clear unblock request, and doesn't provide any context as to why an admin should unblock you. I strongly suggest you read WP:GAB before rewriting your unblock request. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 07:00, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Removed your last unblock request per Wikipedia:No personal attacks. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 14:28, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

March 2025

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Burke family (Castlebar). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. JeffSpaceman (talk) 12:57, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Jeff, the entire article is biased and assert the remarkable proposition that women can become men and visa versa. 97.106.148.231 (talk) 12:27, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It is a form of gaslighting to imply that people making extravagant claims which have no basis in biological reality are not being litigious and this fellow is. Please do not post yoursense on my page. I don't want to speak with ideologues like you 97.106.148.231 (talk) 12:29, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Tech Against Terrorism. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. JeffSpaceman (talk) 12:25, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 months for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 13:44, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Block extended

Of course insulting the blocking admin helps your case! Your block has been extended to 3 months and your access to editing this page has been revoked. See below. Bishonen | tålk 19:06, 21 March 2025 (UTC).[reply]

March 2025

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the Unblock Ticket Request System that have been declined leading to the posting of this notice.

Bishonen | tålk 19:08, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.