User talk:86.173.138.5

November 2020

Hello, I'm Slykos. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Zinash Tayachew have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Slykos (talk) 17:55, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Thank you for the message. Your edit was mistaken (Inappropriate date format and puffery content supported by an extremely biased source) and so has been reverted.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Zinash Tayachew. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Slykos (talk) 18:10, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Slykos - your edits, and associated comments, to this article, are mistaken.

Your edits

• Date format - you are trying to force MDY, whereas DMY are appropriate for the country. For example, see [1]
• Puffery. You are trying to force, ([2])for example

-'she works with compassion' This is clearly puffery & non-neutral ... and is certainly in contrast to your wish for other articles to be neutral. For example, see [3]

-'Through her charity work, First Lady Zinash has become a hope for so many' Again, this is clearly puffery & non-neutral.

• And, this edit is supported by what is clearly a highly biased source. See [4]

Your comments

• Please stop making false claims of, For example, see [5] & [6]
• And when other editors reply to your (inappropriate comments) then you should be civil by at least reply to them rather then simply adding a standard (and again inappropriate) comment.

Revert

• Your edit has been reverted again: Please do not revert and please do not add further inappropriate 'warnings' to other. Should you wish please start a discussion here or on the relevant talk page.

Reported and resolved Slykos was reported to admins. The subsequent comment by one is clear, see [7]

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Someone using this IP address, 86.173.138.5, has made edits that do not conform to our policies and therefore have been reverted. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you did not do this, you may wish to consider getting a username to avoid confusion with other editors. If you'd like to experiment with the syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

You don't have to log in to read or edit pages on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free, requires no personal information, and has many benefits. Without a username, your IP address is used to identify you.

Some good links for newcomers are:

• Help contents – the main help page.
• Quick guide – a "cheatsheet" listing the main editing commands.
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Tutorial

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and a timestamp. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask the Help Desk, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Again, welcome! Slykos (talk) 18:40, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

December 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Hacky sack. Per WP:BRD it is up to you to take your change to the talk page if it is challenged. It is not simply a US thing, but since neither version was sourced I have simply removed it. Meters (talk) 20:04, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent editing history at Hacky sack shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 20:12, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

---