User talk:82.132.215.56

New messages will appear at the bottom of this page.

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

Your IP address, 82.132.215.56, is registered to O2 Online (UK), a mobile phone provider, and is used by many of its customers, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. Administrators may want to consider using a range block as cellular IPs change frequently. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

Network administrators, to monitor this IP address for vandalism, can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

August 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Berwick-upon-Tweed has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Berwick-upon-Tweed was changed by 82.132.215.56 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.96401 on 2018-08-30T15:02:09+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:02, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Norham. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 ^{talk to me | my contributions} 15:06, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Norham Castle, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Norham Castle was changed by 82.132.215.56 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.850566 on 2018-08-30T15:07:45+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:07, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for persistent vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 15:09, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

November 2018

Hello, I'm Everedux. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Brett Storey have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Everedux (talk) 17:41, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Elijah Daniel. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. JACKINTHEBOX • ^TALK 11:56, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sam Alvey. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Cassiopeia talk 21:50, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2022

Hello, I'm Suonii180. I noticed that you recently removed content from VTB Capital without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Suonii180 (talk) 19:41, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to VTB Capital, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Quid Est Squid (talk) 19:43, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Apparently you are illiterate. Get a grown-up to help you by reading the edit history entries to you. 82.132.215.56 (talk) 19:50, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at VTB Capital, you may be blocked from editing. Suonii180 (talk) 20:12, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:13, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

82.132.215.56 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have not made any personal attacks. Other editors have falsely accused me of not explaining my edits, and they have added nonsense text to an article. That is clearly and obviously harmful. My edits have been clearly and obviously beneficial. 82.132.215.56 (talk) 20:18, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I have extended your block from 24 to 48 hours for your transparent lie here. Additionally, I see you were violating WP:EW. If that resumes once your block expires, expect your next block to be longer. Yamla (talk) 20:22, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

82.132.215.56 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

"Transparent lie"?? What are you referring to? And how does it justify your punitive actions? 82.132.215.56 (talk) 20:32, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Usual bad manners from LTA WP:BKFIP. Talk page access revoked. Favonian (talk) 21:22, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.

Above you said "Apparently you are illiterate. Get a grown-up to help you by reading the edit history entries to you." that's a personal attack. Lavalizard101 (talk) 21:04, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.