User talk:80.216.145.96

CheckUser evidence has determined that this IP address (or network) has been used abusively.
This address (or network) has been blocked temporarily or permanently to prevent further abuse.

In extreme cases, an entire network may be blocked to prevent an abusive user from continually changing their IP address in order to evade blocks or abusing multiple accounts. If you are a registered user and are seeing this message, please follow these instructions.

Administrators: CheckUsers are privy to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy, and therefore must be consulted before this block can be removed.

CheckUser evidence has determined that this IP address (or network) has been used abusively.
This address (or network) has been blocked temporarily or permanently to prevent further abuse.

In extreme cases, an entire network may be blocked to prevent an abusive user from continually changing their IP address in order to evade blocks or abusing multiple accounts. If you are a registered user and are seeing this message, please follow these instructions.

Administrators: CheckUsers are privy to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy, and therefore must be consulted before this block can be removed.

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

80.216.145.96 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

80.216.145.96 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Blocking administrator: Dmcdevit (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: You're not autoblocked MaxSem 07:28, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

80.216.145.96 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Vem som än fick den här addressen blockerad spelar ingen roll för det var inte jag som skriver nu. Whoever got this address block those not matter beacuse it wasn´t me who´s writting now.

Decline reason:

The block in question is a checkuser block -- those aren't overturned lightly. It's apparent that this address is or has been a source of persistent abuse. While I regret any collateral damage this may be causing, Dmcdevit's checkuser investigation has determined that the block is called for. You can contact unblock-en-l or Dmcdevit directly if you have any further questions. – Luna Santin (talk) 02:08, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

80.216.145.96 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Nobody has done any edit with this address and no rule on this website has been broken via this ip. I am sure of that. This is probably just a missunderstanding so please any admin unblock for now.

Decline reason:

Hello and good bye, Verdict. -- Netsnipe ► 17:20, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Edits to Brock Lesnar

Your edits aren't constructive, You're removing a lot of information and rewording other information into a non-encyclopedic way. Since so many people want to protect that article for some reason, it's best you just introduce edits one at a time, changing once piece at a time and see if it gets reverted. That's the best thing to do. Wikidudeman ^(talk) 07:55, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

July 2007

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Brock Lesnar, you will be blocked from editing. Wikidudeman ^(talk) 08:37, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Blocked

You have been blocked for a period of 3 months for having been a previously banned user. See Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Verdict. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Wikidudeman ^(talk) 09:35, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.