User talk:7skyeditor

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Editing tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
Naming conventions
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 15:25, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lady Kola for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lady Kola is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lady Kola until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mccapra (talk) 06:25, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mccapra i can see you are doing a great job here. anyway i was just hoping if you can help on my new article that am about to write. Thank you 7skyeditor (talk) 17:55, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Hello. Your recent edit to List of hip hop musicians appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Kinu ^t/_c 18:12, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. yes i do wish to create such an article, and yes the subject qualifies for a separate. Thank you 7skyeditor (talk) 18:35, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Can anyone help me on my new article?

Hey @Kinu & @Mccapra hope you doing great. i was hoping if both of you help me on creating a new artist profile. 7skyeditor (talk) 19:38, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

hi the most important thing to do before you start writing is to collect reliable independent sources that provide in-depth coverage of your chosen subject. If you have those please copy them here and I’ll take a look. Mccapra (talk) 19:41, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Mccapra thanks for replying. please lookup this name on google "Lil Meek DC" thank you 7skyeditor (talk) 16:57, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ok I’ve done that. What are the reliable independent sources you’re planning to use that provide in-depth coverage of the subject? Mccapra (talk) 21:02, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Mccapra sorry for the late reply. Picking the right sources is where i want you to help me on because i don't know which one will be approved and which will not be, please help me on picking the right reliable independent sources on Google. Thank You 7skyeditor (talk) 17:50, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well in my Google search I didn’t find any. You need to choose a subject to write about for which there is in depth coverage in reliable independent sources. Newly emerging rappers aren’t likely to have that. Mccapra (talk) 19:25, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Mccapra subject i wanted to write about "Lil Meek DC" is how he started his rap career and who inspired him to choose rap music plus the challenges he had along the way,. Thank you 7skyeditor (talk) 19:48, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I understand, but without acceptable sources the article will just get deleted. You need to choose a subject that has proper sources. It looks like this doesn’t. Mccapra (talk) 20:16, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Mccapra thank you so much for all your help i really appreciate it alot, in the meantime I'll look for the proper sources and i'll get back to for any help. Thank you again 7skyeditor (talk) 17:10, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Everyone I need help on a new musical project

Can any help me to create a musician page here 7skyeditor (talk) 17:54, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 22:13, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

7skyeditor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Thank you for reviewing my case. I understand that my previous contributions were viewed as promotional. I sincerely apologize for not fully adhering to Wikipedia's neutrality and notability guidelines. I now understand the importance of maintaining a neutral tone and using reliable, verifiable sources.

I am committed to editing constructively and following Wikipedia policies strictly going forward. I will avoid any promotional content and focus only on improving the encyclopedia with well-sourced, neutral information. I respectfully request a second chance. 7skyeditor (talk) 15:20, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We do not consider chatbot-generated requests. GPTZero score: 100%. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 15:23, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

7skyeditor (talk) 15:20, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dear Wikikpedia reviewing administrator, hope you doing wel, i fully understand my block was due to promotional editing, and i sincerely apologize. I've reviewed Wikipedia's policies on neutrail comtentamd reliable sourcing, and i now recognize how my edits violated these guidelines. Going forward, I'll ensure all contributions are strictly policy compliant, focusing on verifiable information without promotional intent. I aim to edit constructively and respect Wikipedia's mission. Thnak you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 7skyeditor (talk • contribs) 16:01, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Still GPTZero=100%. Write it yourself. Turns out just misspelling AI generated verbiage is still AI-generated verbiage. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 18:47, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I know I’m not a good writer but or good reader at the same time, so I’m writing this short review for Wikimedia editors to let them know I made a mistake and if I’m given another chance I would really appreciate it and use Wikipedia politics and guidelines for the better, please I really need you guys to look in to my account and give me a chance to correct my mistakes. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 7skyeditor (talk • contribs)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

7skyeditor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here 7skyeditor (talk) 10:05, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

"Your reason here" is not a reason to unblock you. If you wish to request unblock from a third party administrator, please make a new request where you remove the words "your reason here" and replace them with your statement as to why you should be unblocked. If you wish to first attempt to negotiate with Bbb23 first, as you seem to be below, you don't need to make an unblock request. Please place new comments at the bottom of the page, so they stay in order. 331dot (talk) 10:24, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello @Bbb23 hope you are doing alright sir. I reach out to you with the hope that you are doing well. Respectfully asking for a review of the block that has been put in place on my Wikipedia account/IP address. I recognize how vital it is for Wikipedia to preserve its accuracy and quality and I am fully in agreement with the community's dedication to achieving that. If my actions were unintentional and there was a misjudgment, I apologize deeply. My goal during my contributions has always been to add value and support the mission of Wikipedia . I would appreciate having the chance to learn specifically why the block was applied and to ensure that i can partake in the project in compliance with set guidelines. I wish to rejoin the Wikipedia community and am ready to follow the necessary guidelines to earn back my access. I appreciate your thoughtfulness.