User talk:49.180.128.77

Competitors

The article is about the Note 8, you can't just keep mentioning each and every competitor. There are so many (Essential Phone, V30, G6, to name a few).

It's not just me, other editors also disagree with what you're doing, so please stop telling me that I don't own Wikipedia.

Please stop re-adding the comparison thing between the iPhone X and Note8, this is a wikipedia for information, not for comparison Itsquietuptown (talk) 02:21, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Darius robin (talk) 06:21, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The claim that comparisons can't be included in Wikipedia articles is blatantly false and laughable. Show me Wikipedia policy to support your ridiculous assertion. If you can't then you are simply talking baseless nonsense that has zero weight and enforcement. You claim there are other comparable models but don't support your claim with citations. If you have citations then please explain why such information cannot be added? So until you can come up with plausible excuses to remove my edit please desist from your vandalism or you will simply be reverted. 49.180.128.77 (talk) 06:34, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm keeping my stance and have given enough explanation. Your edits will be reverted. Darius robin (talk) 06:55, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I asked for solid Wikipedia policy – not your wishful expectation. If you have no WP to support your claim then you have no valid explanation and zero right to keep your stance or remove my edit. 49.180.128.77 (talk) 08:33, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hayman30, could you please help here? Darius robin (talk) 08:46, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your latest excuse only proves that you are a sore loser who has run out of lame excuses: "Do whatever you want, this is unacceptable"! Your edit summary is meaningless and immature. 49.180.128.77 (talk) 22:29, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stop being such a kid. Emir of Wikipedia also disagrees, now please just give up. Darius robin (talk) 02:31, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 09:57, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Materialscientist so you blocked me but not the guy who repeatedly reverted my edit using baseless excuses?! Did you even take the time to understand or read both sides of the argument, or are you just targeting the easier IP address? 49.180.128.77 (talk) 10:07, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.