User talk:2A02:587:450A:2300:490A:CEC9:CAAF:EAD7

May 2025

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Riemann–Hilbert problem, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Celjski Grad (talk) 13:07, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

For God's sake, this is not original research. DBAR is NOT a genralization of RH and this is obvious to anybody who can read the article!

DBAR generalizes analyticity, not RH.

One could delete the whole DBAR "contribution". The only way to save it is to postulate a mixed DBAR problem with jump! 2A02:587:450A:2300:490A:CEC9:CAAF:EAD7 (talk) 13:13, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If this is obvious to anyone reading the article then it doesn't need to be added. See WP:SKYISBLUE. Celjski Grad (talk) 13:16, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It is an obvious MISTAKE! 2A02:587:450A:2300:490A:CEC9:CAAF:EAD7 (talk) 13:37, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If your addition is meant to correct a serious or fundamental error in the article then open up a discussion on the article's talk page and ping some recent editors to get consensus on your proposed changes. Otherwise you are simply adding a paragraph of original research. Celjski Grad (talk) 13:42, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Riemann–Hilbert problem. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Celjski Grad (talk) 13:10, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Riemann–Hilbert problem, you may be blocked from editing. Celjski Grad (talk) 13:20, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Celjski Grad (talk) 13:57, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:56, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.