Jump to content

User talk:27.147.228.7

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 2022

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Ameisenigel. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Gabriel Batistuta—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Ameisenigel (talk) 13:09, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025

[edit]

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings.

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2025

[edit]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Salsareans (talk) 13:46, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  PhilKnight (talk) 12:12, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

27.147.228.7 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

If unblocked, I commit to contributing neutrally and encyclopedically. I will focus on adding sourced information to topics I'm knowledgeable about neutrally', 'fixing typos', 'copyediting' and will strictly avoid any promotional content or undisclosed COI editing. I will ensure my edits are based on reliable, independent sources.

I apologize for the disruption and ask for a second chance to contribute positively. 27.147.228.7 (talk) 06:48, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Close as unresponsive. 331dot (talk) 22:01, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Most of the edits from this IP were to spam a link to ICS Legal. What's your association with it? 331dot (talk) 08:17, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]