User talk:2601:14D:4D80:1470:D876:B1FE:63A8:C51A

April 2025

Hello, I'm Jlktutu. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Jlktutu (talk) 04:03, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't give a shit. You're a Nazi. 2601:14D:4D80:1470:D876:B1FE:63A8:C51A (talk) 04:04, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry that you feel that way. But please refrain from adding unreferenced information to Wikipedia Artifles Jlktutu (talk) 04:06, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kill yourself. Follow your leader. 2601:14D:4D80:1470:D876:B1FE:63A8:C51A (talk) 04:06, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There's nothing unreferenced about it. Your Fuehrer is murdering innocent civilians. Account for this. Why is this edit not allowed? 2601:14D:4D80:1470:D876:B1FE:63A8:C51A (talk) 04:07, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is not a single disambiguation which is sourced on this page. Why, pray tell, is this specific example not allowed? 2601:14D:4D80:1470:D876:B1FE:63A8:C51A (talk) 04:09, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I find it quite interesting that the page National-Social Association is allowed to be listed as a disambiguation, despite being very clearly marked as having nothing to do with "National Socialism," while the Republican Party (United States) page is being repeatedly removed despite having a far more explicit connection to that ideology than the aforementioned example. Care to account for this? 2601:14D:4D80:1470:D876:B1FE:63A8:C51A (talk) 04:28, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not a fan of any dictator, even orange. However, Wikipedia Articles ought to have sources. Jlktutu (talk) 04:37, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I repeat: there are no sources whatsoever on that entire page. Why is the one particular thing that I added considered "unsourced" while the entire rest of the page is allowed to remain unquestioned, including at least one entry which explicitly states that it is not actually related to the substance of said page? 2601:14D:4D80:1470:D876:B1FE:63A8:C51A (talk) 04:50, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I understand what you're saying about this Article having no sources. If you wanted to improve the Article however, it is still advised to provide a reliable source. Further, your addition linked to an Article about a Contentious Topic. See Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Jlktutu (talk) 04:56, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This list is covered under WP:CSC #3. Items which are verifiably part of a group. That can be either in the main article of the item or in the list. For the proposed entry, there is not a reference supporting inclusion in either location.

Because of the personal attacks earlier in this section, the block is extended to two weeks without talk page access. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 09:38, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Jlktutu (talk) 04:11, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

April 2025

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring, as done at National Socialist Party.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 04:24, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for making personal attacks towards other editors. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 09:16, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.