Jump to content

User talk:212.117.1.186

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

2015

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

212.117.1.186 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I need to unblock.

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

212.117.1.186 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I need to unblock again.

Decline reason:

This IP address was not blocked when you posted these "unblock requests", but it is now, to prevent further waste of administrators' time with more of the same nonsense. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:57, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

212.117.1.186 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I need to unblock again.

Decline reason:

You should have learned that "unblock requests" of this type are a waste of everybody's time, including your own. Talk page access revoked. Huon (talk) 14:22, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

212.117.1.186 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Wikipedia is an software-- Wiat, wrong name, I will unblock you.

Decline reason:

Wiat, I will not unblock you. I will also protect the talk page. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:28, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

212.117.1.186 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I need to unblock again.

Decline reason:

There's no need to repeat this cycle. Kuru (talk) 11:19, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

February 2016

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for abuse of editing privileges. Your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.  CT Cooper · talk 20:17, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

After a review of edits on Tarkattack (talk · contribs) and this IP address, it seems clear that they are the same person.

@Tarkattack: While you are not currently blocked and therefore can't be evading a block, it is still inappropriate of you to be making undisclosed edits logged-out while under the supervision of an administrator – this is avoiding scrutiny and will not be tolerated. I'm going to be generous and presume you haven't seen the last chance message on your talk page. It still applies now, so if you want to edit, log-in with the Tarkattack account now and use that to edit or don't edit at all. To enforce this instruction, I'm blocking this IP address to unregistered users and disabling editing on this talk page – user your account talk page if you have anything to say. CT Cooper · talk 20:17, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have re-blocked this IP address for one year based on evidence that it has been used by Dan9122 (talk · contribs). Logged-in editing is now disabled due to a history of this user using sock puppet accounts. Talk page editing shall also remain disabled. CT Cooper · talk 19:42, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Nick Moyes. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Vyond have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Nick Moyes (talk) 12:38, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Unblock request

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

212.117.1.186 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I, Dan9122, am announcing my official retirement from Wikipedia. I have come to accept that I am beyond redemption at this point, and there is no way I can possibly regain everyone's trust now. However, I don't want anyone else using this address to go through any problems when they try to edit Wikipedia, therefore I am requesting for this IP address to be blocked, but I shall not edit from it ever again. Thank you.

Decline reason:

I think you mean you are requesting for it to be unblocked. That's not how this works. We're not going to rely on your word to remove this block. If someone else, either here, or with a different account, requests unblock, it will be considered at that time. It's nice to know that you are now concerned about how your block might affect others, but you should have considered that in the first place. Actions have consequences. 331dot (talk) 15:43, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Side note: The user accounts HTMLCAN from Sploder Group, Sploder Press, Bratislava Guy, IliketacosXD, Sploder Media, Butcher.dave, WikivsorWithAnI, Sploder Canada, Jay Trafford Mark Smith's Agent, Tarkattack, Tarkspark, and Dan2811 are legitimate sockpuppets of Dan9122. Hope you tag all accounts as intended. 212.117.1.186 (talk) 14:46, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]