You've added URLS to an offsite web page (http://www.ruxlds.com/) to a number of articles within the Latter Day Saint movement artices on Wikipedia. The additions appear to be commercial link-spam (ie, that you may own/operate the sites in question), which is against Wikipedia policies (see Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not), which is why they have been removed.
The idea that more contrarian points of view for the LDS church is fine, however, there are probably better sites available than the one you listed, which, to be honest, is scant in information and seems incomplete. No offense is made if you are the owner/operator, but the URL it needs to be more relevant to the article at hand. Perhaps you can suggest other sites?
If we are wrong in this, my apologies - and please drop my a note on my talk page and let's figure out why this particular web site needs to be included/why it is more relevant than others listed. -Visorstuff18:32, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I added that link only because I ran across it. I have no affiliation with that website and I must have thought there was more there then appears to actually be. It was actually one of my first edits, so I'll try to be more cautious in the future.
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopaedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Fifteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. - RoyBoy80004:14, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I'm Weber, and if I'm right, you're the vandal who has been blatantly annoying me for the past n weeks. Please stop. If you are not the vandal, do not heed this message. PHS18:58, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hey; many thanks to your continuing contributions to theSTART. Just letting you know it's okay / encouraged to add more than one sentence in an article per edit, as it makes it easier to browse through the history page of that article. If you're making many edits within a small period of time, consider combining them into one single edit. Thanks! ~ PseudoSudo08:04, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. 04:11, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of WP:NPOV are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. -- xaosfluxTalk/CVU03:18, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Monkeyman(talk)20:07, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of WP:NPOV are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 20:52, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Monkeyman(talk) 20:07, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
