User talk:109.195.85.9

April 2025

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for block evasion.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:50, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

109.195.85.9 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sorry why im blocked? I didnt evade any blocks cause i wasnt blocoked. I reported other user for vandalism in Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism and suddenly i had blocked message. What exactly i did wrong? 109.195.85.9 (talk) 14:04, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Sorry why im blocked? I didnt evade any blocks cause i wasnt blocoked. I reported other user for vandalism in  Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism and suddenly i had blocked message. What exactly i did wrong? [[Special:Contributions/109.195.85.9|109.195.85.9]] ([[User talk:109.195.85.9#top|talk]]) 14:04, 29 April 2025 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Sorry why im blocked? I didnt evade any blocks cause i wasnt blocoked. I reported other user for vandalism in  Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism and suddenly i had blocked message. What exactly i did wrong? [[Special:Contributions/109.195.85.9|109.195.85.9]] ([[User talk:109.195.85.9#top|talk]]) 14:04, 29 April 2025 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Sorry why im blocked? I didnt evade any blocks cause i wasnt blocoked. I reported other user for vandalism in  Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism and suddenly i had blocked message. What exactly i did wrong? [[Special:Contributions/109.195.85.9|109.195.85.9]] ([[User talk:109.195.85.9#top|talk]]) 14:04, 29 April 2025 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

@ScottishFinnishRadish: This block is for block evasion. While this is clearly the same user targeted by the Special:Contributions/109.195.85.8/29 range block, I'm not sure if this is block evasion. Are you seeing something I'm not? Alternatively, perhaps you meant to apply a block for WP:LTA here? Please note that I'm unaware of the specific sockpuppetry going on with the /29 range, so it's entirely likely I therefore missed something. --Yamla (talk) 14:13, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yamla, as far as I'm concerned an LTA block and block evasion block are functionally the same. The block is for the same reason, due to disruption they're not currently allowed to edit. I made the assumption that the rangeblock was partial to allow for edits in the range that aren't from this blocked editor, as the block is for three years, and as you said, this is clearly the same editor. If they weren't on a dynamic range and were instead using an account they would certainly be indeffed. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:20, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It stated that i was blocked only in page Book of Shadows: Blair Witch 2 , i wasnt blocked on other pages which is how i was edited them today and before without problems. And why my compaint was deleted right before i was blocked today https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism&diff=prev&oldid=1287955618 ? 109.195.85.9 (talk) 14:27, 29 April 2025 (UTC)}}[reply]

When i was blocked on Blair witch 2 page, i got full block only for around 3 days, which long ago expired. 109.195.85.9 (talk) 14:29, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry can i ask about vandalism? User https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:MikeAllen that vandalised Blair witch 2 artcicle and started edit war and stalked me there for half year since 8 July 2024 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Book_of_Shadows:_Blair_Witch_2&action=history&offset=20241019231204%7C1252131521, month ago stalked and vandalised my talk page https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:109.195.85.9&diff=1287968524&oldid=1280276390 now again stalked and vandalised without reasons my only new contributions since i last time interacted with him https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Under_the_Silver_Lake&action=history only thing i did on Under the Silver Lake page is corrected two words and one grammatic error, and MikeAllen reverted it again to incorrect version. All my edits for last almost year - wherever i go on movies pages and on my personal pages - he stalk and reverse without reasons and explanations. Like he has right to do that? Or can i do anything to stop this and him leave me alone? 109.195.85.9 (talk) 18:11, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

109.195.85.9 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It stated that i was blocked only in page Book of Shadows: Blair Witch 2 , i wasnt blocked on other pages which is how i was edited them today and before without problems. And why my compaint was deleted right before i was blocked today https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism&diff=prev&oldid=1287955618 ? 109.195.85.9 (talk) 14:27, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=It stated that i was blocked only in page Book of Shadows: Blair Witch 2 , i wasnt blocked on other pages which is how i was edited them today and before without problems. And why my compaint was deleted right before i was blocked today https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism&diff=prev&oldid=1287955618 ? [[Special:Contributions/109.195.85.9|109.195.85.9]] ([[User talk:109.195.85.9#top|talk]]) 14:27, 29 April 2025 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=It stated that i was blocked only in page Book of Shadows: Blair Witch 2 , i wasnt blocked on other pages which is how i was edited them today and before without problems. And why my compaint was deleted right before i was blocked today https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism&diff=prev&oldid=1287955618 ? [[Special:Contributions/109.195.85.9|109.195.85.9]] ([[User talk:109.195.85.9#top|talk]]) 14:27, 29 April 2025 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=It stated that i was blocked only in page Book of Shadows: Blair Witch 2 , i wasnt blocked on other pages which is how i was edited them today and before without problems. And why my compaint was deleted right before i was blocked today https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism&diff=prev&oldid=1287955618 ? [[Special:Contributions/109.195.85.9|109.195.85.9]] ([[User talk:109.195.85.9#top|talk]]) 14:27, 29 April 2025 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

109.195.85.9 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sorry can somebody explain what for block? I didnt evade any others blocks cause i didnt has any other current blocks, my replies is without response. I cant know what i should not do in future if i dont what rules did i break. 109.195.85.9 (talk) 14:59, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Sorry can somebody explain what for block? I didnt evade any others blocks cause i didnt has any other current blocks, my replies is without response. I cant know what i should not do in future if i dont what rules did i break. [[Special:Contributions/109.195.85.9|109.195.85.9]] ([[User talk:109.195.85.9#top|talk]]) 14:59, 29 April 2025 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Sorry can somebody explain what for block? I didnt evade any others blocks cause i didnt has any other current blocks, my replies is without response. I cant know what i should not do in future if i dont what rules did i break. [[Special:Contributions/109.195.85.9|109.195.85.9]] ([[User talk:109.195.85.9#top|talk]]) 14:59, 29 April 2025 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Sorry can somebody explain what for block? I didnt evade any others blocks cause i didnt has any other current blocks, my replies is without response. I cant know what i should not do in future if i dont what rules did i break. [[Special:Contributions/109.195.85.9|109.195.85.9]] ([[User talk:109.195.85.9#top|talk]]) 14:59, 29 April 2025 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

You now have three simultaneous unblock requests. This is abusive. Which single one do you wish to be reviewed? WP:GAB explains how to properly contest your block. --Yamla (talk) 15:01, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yamla, when i try to reply to you, i had text "The "reply" link cannot be used to reply to this comment. To reply, please use the full page editor by clicking "Edit"." So its hard for me to reply. Sorry.

Yamla, Umm, i mean, can any of them be reviewed? I mean, there is some confusion cause i realy didnt has other current blocks to evade, otherwise how i could've made edits from this page before?

No. Pick one. Or take down all three and make one new one. --Yamla (talk) 15:15, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Umm, first one, i guess.

Can you also please tell me what should i do so this would be adressed https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism&diff=prev&oldid=1287955618 ? 109.195.85.9 (talk) 15:20, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I just dont know why i get banned right after i posted complaint, so i hope at least one would be adressed. 109.195.85.9 (talk) 15:26, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry can i ask about vandalism? User https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:MikeAllen that vandalised Blair witch 2 artcicle and started edit war and stalked me there for half year since 8 July 2024 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Book_of_Shadows:_Blair_Witch_2&action=history&offset=20241019231204%7C1252131521, month ago stalked and vandalised my talk page https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:109.195.85.9&diff=1287968524&oldid=1280276390 now again stalked and vandalised without reasons my only new contributions since i last time interacted with him https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Under_the_Silver_Lake&action=history only thing i did on Under the Silver Lake page is corrected two words and one grammatic error, and MikeAllen reverted it again to incorrect version. All my edits for last almost year - wherever i go on movies pages and on my personal pages - he stalk and reverse without reasons and explanations. Like he has right to do that? Or can i do anything to stop this and him leave me alone? 109.195.85.9 (talk) 18:10, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.