Jump to content

User:YettaYettaYetta/sandbox

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  • Comment: There are multiple topics blended together here. Please do not submit your test edits to AfC for review. CNMall41 (talk) 02:53, 11 May 2025 (UTC)


2004 European Parliament election in the Czech Republic
11–12 June 2004
All 24 Czech seats in the European Parliament
Turnout28.3%
  First party Second party Third party
 
Leader Mirek Topolánek Miroslav Grebeníček Vladimír Špidla
Party ODS KSČM ČSSD
Seats won 9 6 2
  Fourth party Fifth party Sixth party
 
Leader Miroslav Kalousek Vladimír Železný Josef Zieleniec
Party Lidovci Independents (Nezávislí) Union of Independents–European Democrats
Seats won 2 2 3

2004 European Parliament election in the Czech Republic

[edit]

Electoral System and Voter Eligibility

[edit]

Electoral System Details

[edit]

The elections were conducted under the closed-list proportional representation system (CLPR), with the country being elected as a single constituency, with voters voting for one party or coalition of parties, and seats allocated to each party in proportion to the votes received.[1]The CLPR system also impact on local representation and voter mobilization.[2] Under the CLPR system, political parties pre-rank candidates on closed lists, denying voters the option to prioritize individuals.[3] This electoral system ensures the representation of each party in the European Parliament, while also strengthening the candidate ranking mechanism within the party. This system favored larger, well-established parties, as smaller groups struggled to meet the threshold.[4] Candidate ranking strategies have an important impact on intra-party competition and election results. Candidates with higher rankings are more likely to be elected, thus affecting the internal operation of political parties.[4]

Eligibility and Participation

Citizenship: Czech citizens had to be at least 18 years old by election day.[1]

Residency: Eligible voters included both residents of Czech Republic and registered Czech citizens living abroad.[5]

Exclusions: Individuals stripped of legal capacity due to court rulings or imprisoned for serious crimes were ineligible to vote.[1]

Approximately 8.2 million citizens were eligible to vote in the 2004 elections. However, turnout was just 28.3%.[6]

Party Eligibility

[edit]

Registration: Parties were required to submit candidate lists to the Czech Ministry of the Interior at least 66 days before the election.[6]

Threshold: To gain representation, a party needed at least 5% of the national vote. Coalitions of two or three parties required 10%, while coalitions of four or more needed 15%.[6]

Deposit: Each party had to pay a non-refundable fee of 20,000 CZK (approximately €650) per candidate list, which was forfeited if the party failed to win a seat.[6]

Candidate Requirements

[edit]

Age: Candidates had to be at least 21 years old.[5]

No Dual Mandates: Sitting members of the Czech Parliament or government officials were barred from running for the European Parliament.[7]

These regulations maintains a fair and structured electoral process, aligning with the Czech Republic's democratic commitments following its accession to the European Union in May 2004.[7]

Background

[edit]

The 2004 European Parliament elections were the first European Parliament elections in which the Czech Republic participated. The elections took place on 11–12 June 2004, with results announced on 13 June after all EU states completed voting.[8] The elections marked the first elections to the European Parliament for the Czech Republic since it joined the EU on 1 May 2004, and were an important step in the country's integration into the European political system.[9] Czech Republic implemented reforms to align its political system with EU standards.[10]

Domestic Political Landscape

[edit]

At the time of the election, the Czech Republic was governed by a centre-left coalition led by Prime Minister Vladimír Špidla of Czech Social Democratic Party (ČSSD). The coalition ČSSD, KDU-ČSL, US-DEU) aligned Czech laws with EU standards while tackling economic stagnation and public sector reforms.[11]

President Václav Klaus, a vocal eurosceptic from the Civic Democratic Party (ODS), held significant influence. His criticism of EU federalism contrasted sharply with the government's pro-EU agenda, creating a polarized political climate. Klaus's skepticism resonated with voters concerned about sovereignty, particularly in rural areas and among older demographics.[12]

The accession profoundly influenced the EP election:

[edit]

Pro-EU campaigns: Governing parties (ČSSD, KDU-ČSL) framed the election as a step toward securing EU funds for infrastructure and agriculture.[11]

Eurosceptic backlash: the Civic Democratic Party and smaller parties like the Communists (KSČM) warned against ceding sovereignty to Brussels, appealing to voters wary of EU regulations on farming and labor.[12]

Shift in political discourse: EU membership forced parties to clarify their stance on integration. While ČSSD advocated deeper cooperation,ODS pushed for a "flexible Europe" prioritizing national interests.[11]

Despite initial enthusiasm, voter turnout for the EP election was 28.3%, the lowest in the EU. Analysts attributed this to public disillusionment with both domestic politics and the perceived remoteness of EU decision-making.[11]

Campaign

[edit]

Czech Social Democratic Party (ČSSD)

[edit]

Czech Social Democratic Party logo (2021)

The ruling Czech Social Democratic Party campaigned on a strongly pro-European integration platform, attempting to portray EU membership as economically beneficial for the country. Their campaign prominently featured EU-funded infrastructure projects, including posters of Prague Metro expansions captioned with slogans such as "Europe's Money, Czech Roads".[13][14]ČSSD also partnered with Germany's SPD to attract foreign investment, especially from Siemens, as a symbol of modernization and cross-border socialist cooperation.[13]

The 'Tunel' scandal involving ČEZ executives particularly impacted ČSSD, leading to Justice Minister Bureš's resignation. While no other major parties were implicated in this specific case, ODS had faced earlier corruption allegations in 2002 regarding public tenders, as documented by Transparency International Czech Republic.[15]

Internally, ČSSD was divided over how to present its EU alignment to more Eurosceptic rural populations. Some regional figures reportedly pushed for a more cautious message, warning that over-promising EU benefits could backfire, especially in agricultural regions concerned about subsidy competition.[13]

Civic Democratic Party (ODS)

[edit]

Logo of ODS (2015)

ODS' campaign emphasizes criticism of EU policies and advocates for national sovereignty, contrasting the ČSSD's pro-EU optimism. ODS organized public rallies in pubs and town squares, where party leaders criticized EU regulations and raised concerns over national traditions such as Czech beer brewing. Party leader Mirek Topolánek argued that EU integration should not come at the expense of national control.[16][17] However, ODS avoided a full anti-EU stance and instead positioned itself as seeking "a pragmatic, self-respecting Czech voice in Europe".

Tensions within ODS emerged during the campaign as younger party members criticized the leadership's increasingly populist tactics. Several Prague-based candidates preferred a more moderate European message, creating a divide between urban liberal conservatives and rural traditionalists.[17][18]

Green Party (SZ)

[edit]

SZ 362

The Green Party used the 2004 election as a platform to establish its political identity. It promoted a "Green Rail Initiative," advocating for EU funds to be redirected from highway expansion to environmentally sustainable electric trains. SZ also made headlines by publishing full asset declarations of its candidates—an unprecedented act in Czech politics that gained traction among anti-corruption voters.[17][19]

The party's campaign focused on university campuses, including an "Eco Debate Marathon" held at Charles University that helped register 5,000 new young voters. SZ attracted some voters who were concerned about anti-corruption by publishing candidate asset statements.[19]

Czechoslovak People's Party (KDU-ČSL)

[edit]

KDU-ČSL Logo 1992

KDU-ČSL emphasized moral and agricultural values in its campaign, particularly in rural areas. The party distributed voting guides through Catholic churches, calling EU agricultural subsidies "a God's blessing".[20] The party maintained a relatively low-profile media presence, relying on its church network and traditional constituencies to mobilize support. However, younger members in the party expressed frustration over the lack of a broader digital strategy, especially as SZ and ODS aggressively targeted online platforms.[21]

Communist Party of Bohemia and Moravia (KSČM)

[edit]

KSČM text logo

KSČM ran on a platform of "sovereignty and social justice," combining anti-EU rhetoric with nostalgia for the socialist era. The party accused the EU of neoliberalism and warned that Czech workers would become second-class citizens in a capitalist European order.[16] Despite minimal campaigning, KSČM maintained steady support, especially among older voters and in industrial regions such as Northern Bohemia.[21] Internal critics voiced concern that the party's refusal to modernize its messaging risked long-term decline, but the leadership dismissed these worries as "bourgeois revisionism."[16]

Independents and Minor Parties

[edit]

Several independent candidates and small parties attempted to capitalize on voter fatigue with mainstream options. Notably, the Independent Initiative for a Transparent Europe attracted attention for its singular focus on anti-corruption reform, though it lacked the resources for a national campaign.[22] Turnout was notably low (28.3%), and many analysts attributed this to public confusion about the role of the European Parliament, coupled with widespread disillusionment with Czech politics following corruption scandals.[23][24][25]

EU Integration vs. Sovereignty

[edit]

The 2004 European Parliament elections in the Czech Republic was influenced by debates over the country's role in the European Union (EU). Czech Social Democratic Party (ČSSD) promoted EU integration by highlighting infrastructure projects funded by EU resources. Their campaign advertisements showcased Prague Metro expansions, captioned: "Europe's Money, Czech Roads".[26] The Civic Democratic Party (ODS) appealed to nationalist sentiments, holding pub rallies warning that "EU regulations threaten Czech beer purity,".[27]

Economic Modernization

[edit]

ČSSD sought to bolster its pro-European stance by collaborating with Germany's Social Democratic Party (SPD) to attract Siemens investments into Czech manufacturing. The Green Party (SZ) advocated for sustainable development, proposing a "Green Rail Initiative" that prioritized EU funding for electric trains over highway expansion.[28]

Anti-Corruption

[edit]

The 'Tunel' scandal, involving allegations against ČEZ executives, led to Justice Minister Bureš's resignation and was reported to have affected public trust in mainstream political parties.[25] This distrust amplified support for anti-corruption movements. Capitalizing on this sentiment, SZ published detailed candidate asset declarations—an unprecedented move in Czech politics—which earned them the support of younger voters.[24]

Campaign Strategies

[edit]

Political parties employed diverse mobilization strategies. The Christian and Democratic Union – Czechoslovak People's Party (KDU-ČSL) focused on rural communities, distributing voting guides through Catholic churches.[29] SZ targeted students by organizing an "Eco Debate Marathon" at Charles University, which resulted in the registration of 5,000 first-time voters.[30]

Analysis

[edit]

The 2004 European Parliament Election Results in the Czech Republic

[edit]

The Civic Democratic Party (ODS) won the most seats in the Czech Republic, securing 9 out of the 24 available seats in the European Parliament. Its pro-market reforms and alignment with Western European parties solidified its dominance. The party performed particularly well in regions with conservative and economically liberal leanings like Prague and South Moravia.[31][32]

Czech Social Democratic Party (ČSSD), traditionally one of the country's largest parties, finished second with 7 seats. However, its support declined by 42% compared to the 2002 national elections. Public dissatisfaction with its mishandling of pension reforms that disproportionately burdened retirees, and failure to address unemployment peaking at 9.1% in industrial regions.[33] Voters criticized ČSSD's opaque negotiation of EU accession terms, which rural communities perceived as favoring urban elites over agricultural subsidies.[34] Analysts attributed this to widespread voter disillusionment, internal party conflicts, and fallout from the ‘Tunel’ scandal. The low turnout also disproportionately impacted ČSSD, as its traditional voter base—particularly urban workers—was less mobilized.

The Communist Party of Bohemia and Moravia (KSČM) secured 3 seats, maintaining a strong presence in Czech politics. The Greens' 2-seat breakthrough, driven by youth-focused campaigns registering 5,000 first-time voters, signaled shifting priorities toward environmentalism.[35]

The Green Party (SZ) gained 2 seats, marking its first significant success in a national election. The party's focus on environmental issues and sustainability attracted younger voters and those with progressive values.[36]

The Christian and Democratic Union – Czechoslovak People's Party (KDU-ČSL) secured only 1 seat in the election.[37]

Traditional Christian-democratic parties struggled to maintain relevance in a political climate dominated by secular priorities and EU integration debates, as evidenced by declining rural voter engagement.[38]

Post-Election

[edit]

The ODS benefited from widespread support for European integration, particularly in the context of the country's recent EU accession, the Civic Democratic Party (ODS) increased its vote share to 30.0 percent, securing 9 seats and joining the EPP–ED group in the European Parliament.[39] ČSSD's decline stemmed from internal splits over pension reforms and perceived neglect of rural subsidies, its support collapse to 8.8 percent, triggering a 42% voter loss compared to 2002.[40]

Small parties, particularly the Greens, capitalized on environmental concerns among younger voters, doubled its delegation by winning two seats on a platform of environmental sustainability and transparency.[40] The election highlighted the Czech Republic's complex relationship with the European Union, where Euroscepticism coexisted with strong support for EU membership.[41]

While the ODS and ČSSD remained dominant, the strong performance of smaller parties suggested a shift toward a more pluralistic and issue-focused political landscape, with environmental and anti-corruption themes gaining traction. The Greens, appeared well-positioned for future growth as environmental issues gained prominence in public discourse.

The Czech Statistical Office (2004) and European Parliament (2004) respectively quantified national impacts and EU-wide implications of the election." The 28.3% turnout—the EU's lowest—reflected skepticism toward EU benefits, contrasting with 45.5% average participation in Western member states.[42] The election was a significant moment in the country's European integration process

Result and Aftermath

[edit]

The June 2004 European Parliament election, conducted through open-list proportional representation, saw the Eurosceptic The Civic Democratic Party (ODS) secure 9 of 24 seats with 30.04% of votes. This outcome reflected voter dissatisfaction with the ruling ČSSDcoalition, which garnered only 8.78%—its worst performance since 1996. Political analysts attributed the result to corruption scandals involving Social Democrat ministers and unpopular pension reforms.[43][44][45]

The Communist Party (KSČM) retained its core electorate with 20.26%, while the surprise performer was the pro-European SNK European Democrats (SNK-ED), a centrist coalition capitalizing on urban professionals' demand for EU institutional transparency.[46][47]

Voter turnout plummeted to 28.32%, the second-lowest in the EU after Slovakia (17%). Sociological surveys revealed stark demographic divides: 62% of university graduates voted versus 19% of manual workers, while Prague's turnout (38.7%) tripled that of rural Moravia (12.1%).[48][49][50]

The results were a major blow to the ruling ČSSD. Following the party's poor performance, Prime Minister Vladimír Špidla faced internal criticism from senior party members and pressure from coalition partners, he eventually stepped down in mid-2004 after. This marked the beginning of a broader realignment within the Czech centre-left.[51][52]

The success of the ODS strengthened its Eurosceptic platform, with party leader Mirek Topolánek declaring the results a "referendum on government arrogance and EU overreach."[52] ODS used the momentum to bolster its position in the upcoming 2006 parliamentary elections, framing itself as the defender of Czech sovereignty within the EU.

The Green Party's entry into the European Parliament marked a turning point in Czech environmental politics, giving legitimacy to ecological and anti-corruption themes in mainstream discourse.[53]

Turnout concerns triggered a national debate on political apathy, especially among the youth and working-class voters.[54]

The 2004 election exposed fissures between pro-European integration forces and nationalist skepticism within the Czech political spectrum.[55]

Media and Public Reaction

[edit]

A 2004 content analysis of the Czech public broadcaster ČT and leading daily newspapers (Mladá fronta DNES, Právo) found that coverage of the European Parliament election comprised approximately 5 percent of total election reporting time, one of the lowest proportions recorded among all EU member states that year.[56] Editorials in Mladá fronta DNES and Právo criticized both political parties and the electorate, lamenting low turnout and warning that it might undermine the legitimacy of Czech representation in Brussels.[57]

The European Commission welcomed the Czech Republic’s first participation in a European Parliament election but expressed concern that the 28.3 percent turnout indicated many new-member voters did not yet feel the Parliament was relevant to their everyday lives.[58] Major European papers dedicated under three percent of their Europe coverage to the Czech vote.[56][57] A 2004 study of Czech Republic broadcaster ČT and leading newspapers found that coverage of the European Parliament election accounted for only about five percent of election reporting time—among the lowest in the EU. Editorials in Mladá fronta DNES and Právo lamented the low turnout and warned that such apathy could undermine the legitimacy of Czech representation in Brussels.[59][60]

Cultural and Social Impact

[edit]

The campaign spur cross-border discussions on environmental and anti-corruption issues. The Green Party’s “Green Rail Initiative” and its full publication of candidate asset declarations were reported by student newspapers in Warsaw and Bratislava, suggesting early signs of a shared post-accession public debate.[61][62] Political scientists Štefek and Müller attribute this divide to divergent attitudes toward globalization, with urban voters emphasizing economic and mobility benefits of the EU and rural voters expressing concern about agricultural competition and national sovereignty.[63]

The campaign spur cross-border discussions on environmental and anti-corruption issues. The Green Party’s “Green Rail Initiative” and its full publication of candidate asset declarations were reported by student newspapers in Warsaw and Bratislava, suggesting early signs of a shared post-accession public debate.[62][64]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c "Czech Republic 1993 (rev. 2013) Constitution - Constitute". www.constituteproject.org. Retrieved 2025-05-10.
  2. ^ Fiva, Jon H.; Halse, Askill H.; Smith, Daniel M. (2021). "Local Representation and Voter Mobilization in Closed-list Proportional Representation Systems". Quarterly Journal of Political Science. 16 (2): 185–213. doi:10.1561/100.00019147. ISSN 1554-0626.
  3. ^ Espírito-Santo, Ana; Sanches, Edalina Rodrigues (April 2018). "Looking for locals under a closed-list proportional representation system: The case of Portugal". Electoral Studies. 52: 117–127. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2018.01.004. ISSN 0261-3794.
  4. ^ a b Crutzen, Benoît S. Y.; Konishi, Hideo; Sahuguet, Nicolas (October 2024). "The best at the top? Candidate ranking strategies under closed list proportional representation". Political Science Research and Methods. 12 (4): 706–728. doi:10.1017/psrm.2024.10. ISSN 2049-8470.
  5. ^ a b European Parliament. (2004). National results Czechia 2004-2009. Retrieved from https://results.elections.europa.eu/en/national-results/czechia/2004-2009/outgoing-parliament/
  6. ^ a b c d "National results Czechia | 2004 Outgoing Parliament | 2024 European election results | European Parliament". 2024 European election results. Archived from the original on 2025-02-18. Retrieved 2025-05-10.
  7. ^ a b Eiop.or.at. (2007). European integration and Czech political parties. Retrieved from https://eiop.or.at/eiop/pdf/2007-002.pdf
  8. ^ "National results Czechia | 2004 Outgoing Parliament | 2024 European election results | European Parliament". 2024 European election results. Archived from the original on 2025-02-18. Retrieved 2025-05-10.
  9. ^ "2004 Annual Review for the Czech Republic | European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions". www.eurofound.europa.eu. Retrieved 2025-05-10.
  10. ^ "20 years together: Facts and figures about the benefits of the enlargement for the EU - European Commission". commission.europa.eu. Retrieved 2025-05-10.
  11. ^ a b c d Centrum pro výzkum veřejného mínění (CVVM). (2004). Občané o volbách do Evropského parlamentu. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20170315180121/http://cvvm.soc.cas.cz/volby-a-strany/obcane-o-volbach-do-evropskeho-parlamentu
  12. ^ a b "Referendum on UE membership 2003 Czech Republic". www.robert-schuman.eu (in French). Retrieved 2025-05-10.
  13. ^ a b c Šaradín, Pavel; Eichler, Patrik (2023), Skrzypek, Ania; Bíró-Nagy, András (eds.), "The State of Social Democracy in the Czech Republic", The Social Democratic Parties in the Visegrád Countries, Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 53–88, doi:10.1007/978-3-031-30792-8_3, ISBN 978-3-031-30791-1, retrieved 2025-05-10
  14. ^ Kopeček, Lubomír; Šedo, Jakub (2003-04-01). "Czech and Slovak political parties and their vision of European integration". Středoevropské politické studie / Central European Political Studies Review (in Czech). 5 (1). ISSN 1212-7817.
  15. ^ "OECD Economic Surveys: Czech Republic 2004". OECD Economic Surveys: Czech Republic. 2005-01-18. doi:10.1787/eco_surveys-cze-2004-en. ISBN 978-92-64-00716-1. ISSN 1999-0561.
  16. ^ a b c Kopeček, Lubomír; Šedo, Jakub (2003-04-01). "Czech and Slovak political parties and their vision of European integration". Středoevropské politické studie / Central European Political Studies Review (in Czech). 5 (1). ISSN 1212-7817.
  17. ^ a b c Linek, Lukas. "Analysis of the European Parliament elections 2004 in the Czech Republic. Is the theory of second-order elections still valid?". Academia.edu.
  18. ^ Švihlíková, Ilona (2017), Boicu, Ruxandra; Branea, Silvia; Stefanel, Adriana (eds.), "European Parliament Elections in the Czech Republic: Reflection of Citizens' Agenda", Political Communication and European Parliamentary Elections in Times of Crisis, London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, pp. 185–199, doi:10.1057/978-1-137-58591-2_13, ISBN 978-1-137-58590-5, retrieved 2025-05-10
  19. ^ a b Sweeney, Jane P. (2019-07-11), "The European Campaigns of Three Socialist Parties", The First European Elections, Routledge, pp. 111–148, doi:10.4324/9780429310904-5, ISBN 978-0-429-31090-4, retrieved 2025-05-10
  20. ^ "OECD Economic Surveys: Czech Republic 2004". OECD Economic Surveys: Czech Republic. 2005-01-18. doi:10.1787/eco_surveys-cze-2004-en. ISBN 978-92-64-00716-1. ISSN 1999-0561.
  21. ^ a b "2004 Annual Review for the Czech Republic | European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions". www.eurofound.europa.eu. Retrieved 2025-05-10.
  22. ^ "Referendum on UE membership 2003 Czech Republic". www.robert-schuman.eu (in French). Retrieved 2025-05-10.
  23. ^ "2004 Annual Review for the Czech Republic | European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions". www.eurofound.europa.eu. Retrieved 2025-05-10.
  24. ^ a b Linek, Lukas. "Analysis of the European Parliament elections 2004 in the Czech Republic. Is the theory of second-order elections still valid?". Academia.edu.
  25. ^ a b Švihlíková, Ilona (2017), Boicu, Ruxandra; Branea, Silvia; Stefanel, Adriana (eds.), "European Parliament Elections in the Czech Republic: Reflection of Citizens' Agenda", Political Communication and European Parliamentary Elections in Times of Crisis, London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, pp. 185–199, doi:10.1057/978-1-137-58591-2_13, ISBN 978-1-137-58590-5, retrieved 2025-05-10
  26. ^ Hloušek, Vít; Kaniok, Petr (2020), "Czech Republic", The European Parliament Election of 2019 in East-Central Europe, Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 61–82, doi:10.1007/978-3-030-40858-9_4, ISBN 978-3-030-40857-2, retrieved 2025-05-10
  27. ^ Eiop.or.at. (2007). European integration and Czech political parties. Retrieved from https://eiop.or.at/eiop/pdf/2007-002.pdf
  28. ^ Sjps.fsvucm.sk. (2004). Czech political strategy in the European elections. Retrieved from https://sjps.fsvucm.sk/index.php/sjps/article/download/122/80
  29. ^ "KDU-ČSL - 2004". www.kdu.cz. Retrieved 2025-05-10.
  30. ^ Centrum pro výzkum veřejného mínění (CVVM). (2004). Občané o volbách do Evropského parlamentu. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20170315180121/http://cvvm.soc.cas.cz/volby-a-strany/obcane-o-volbach-do-evropskeho-parlamentu
  31. ^ Rovná, Lenka (2005), "Czech Republic", The 2004 Elections to the European Parliament, London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, pp. 81–87, doi:10.1057/9780230523821_9, ISBN 978-1-4039-3518-2, retrieved 2025-05-10
  32. ^ Czech Statistical Office. (2004). 2004 European Parliament Election: Final Results. Prague. Retrieved from https://www.volby.cz/pls/ep2004/ep?xjazyk=EN
  33. ^ Linek, Lukas. "Analysis of the European Parliament elections 2004 in the Czech Republic. Is the theory of second-order elections still valid?". Academia.edu.
  34. ^ Eiop.or.at. (2007). European integration and Czech political parties. Retrieved from https://eiop.or.at/eiop/pdf/2007-002.pdf
  35. ^ European Parliament. (2004). National results Czechia 2004-2009. Retrieved from https://results.elections.europa.eu/en/national-results/czechia/2004-2009/outgoing-parliament/
  36. ^ Linek, Lukas. "Analysis of the European Parliament elections 2004 in the Czech Republic. Is the theory of second-order elections still valid?". Academia.edu.
  37. ^ "KDU-ČSL - 2004". www.kdu.cz. Retrieved 2025-05-10.
  38. ^ Czech Statistical Office. (2004). 2004 European Parliament Election: Final Results. Prague. Retrieved from https://www.volby.cz/pls/ep2004/ep?xjazyk=EN
  39. ^ European Parliament. (2004). National results Czechia 2004-2009. Retrieved from https://results.elections.europa.eu/en/national-results/czechia/2004-2009/outgoing-parliament/
  40. ^ a b Linek, Lukas. "Analysis of the European Parliament elections 2004 in the Czech Republic. Is the theory of second-order elections still valid?". Academia.edu.
  41. ^ Eiop.or.at. (2007). European integration and Czech political parties. Retrieved from https://eiop.or.at/eiop/pdf/2007-002.pdf
  42. ^ European Parliament. (2004). National results Czechia 2004-2009. Retrieved from https://results.elections.europa.eu/en/national-results/czechia/2004-2009/outgoing-parliament/
  43. ^ European Parliament. (2004). National results Czechia 2004-2009. Retrieved from https://results.elections.europa.eu/en/national-results/czechia/2004-2009/outgoing-parliament/
  44. ^ Hloušek, Vít; Kaniok, Petr (2020), "Czech Republic", The European Parliament Election of 2019 in East-Central Europe, Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 61–82, doi:10.1007/978-3-030-40858-9_4, ISBN 978-3-030-40857-2, retrieved 2025-05-10
  45. ^ Gateva, Eli (December 2013). "Post-accession conditionality – translating benchmarks into political pressure?". East European Politics. 29 (4): 420–442. doi:10.1080/21599165.2013.836491. ISSN 2159-9165.
  46. ^ Czech Statistical Office. (2004). 2004 European Parliament Election: Final Results. Prague. Retrieved from https://www.volby.cz/pls/ep2004/ep?xjazyk=EN
  47. ^ Respekt. (2004, June 14). The silent rise of pro-European centrists.
  48. ^ Hosli, Madeleine O.; Kantorowicz, Jaroslaw; Nagtzaam, Marijn A.M.; Haas, Martijn I. (2022-10-26). "Turnout in European parliament elections 1979–2019". European Politics and Society. 25 (1): 1–23. doi:10.1080/23745118.2022.2137918. ISSN 2374-5118.
  49. ^ STEM Institute. (2004). 2004 EP election exit poll. Prague: Author.
  50. ^ Pospěch, Pavel; Hubatková, Barbora; Klíma, Ondřej (2024-06-06). "Does a Rural-Urban Divide Exist in the Czech Republic?". Czech Sociological Review. doi:10.13060/csr.2024.009. ISSN 0038-0288.
  51. ^ Lidové noviny. (2004, July 20). Špidla resigns amid coalition collapse.
  52. ^ a b Hanley, S. (2008). The new right in the new Europe: Czech transformation and right-wing politics, 1989–2006 (p. 89). Routledge.
  53. ^ Gateva, Eli (December 2013). "Post-accession conditionality – translating benchmarks into political pressure?". East European Politics. 29 (4): 420–442. doi:10.1080/21599165.2013.836491. ISSN 2159-9165.
  54. ^ STEM Institute. (2004). 2004 EP election exit poll. Prague: Author.
  55. ^ Eiop.or.at. (2007). European integration and Czech political parties. Retrieved from https://eiop.or.at/eiop/pdf/2007-002.pdf
  56. ^ a b de Vreese, Claes H.; Semetko, Holli A. (2009), "The 2004 European parliamentary elections: Campaigns in the news", Wissenschaft mit Wirkung, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, pp. 31–46, ISBN 978-3-531-16797-8, retrieved 2025-05-26
  57. ^ a b Těšínská, Emilie (2021-05-28). "Účast Československa na zřízení Spojeného ústavu jaderných výzkumů (Dubna, Rusko) a zastoupení v jeho prvním ředitelství". AUC HISTORIA UNIVERSITATIS CAROLINAE PRAGENSIS. 60 (2): 37–72. doi:10.14712/23365730.2021.3. ISSN 2336-5730.
  58. ^ Folz, H.-P. (1998-01-01). "van den Bempt, Paul, and Greet Theelen. From Europe Agreements to Accession: The Integration of the Central and Eastern European Countries into the European Union. Brussels: European Interuniversity Press, Brussels 1996". European Journal of International Law. 9 (4): 776–777. doi:10.1093/ejil/9.4.776. ISSN 0938-5428.
  59. ^ Schlosberg, David (2016-03-07). "Environmental Management in the Anthropocene". Oxford Handbooks Online. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199685271.013.32.
  60. ^ de Vreese, Claes H.; Banducci, Susan A.; Semetko, Holli A.; Boomgaarden, Hajo G. (December 2006). "The News Coverage of the 2004 European Parliamentary Election Campaign in 25 Countries". European Union Politics. 7 (4): 477–504. doi:10.1177/1465116506069440. ISSN 1465-1165.
  61. ^ Šárovec, Daniel (2024-11-01). "Theoretical debate on party digitalization: The case of the Czech Republic". Central European Journal of Politics. 10. doi:10.21062/cejp.2024.002. ISSN 2464-479X.
  62. ^ a b Green Party Czech Republic. Post-Election Campaign Review, internal document, 2004.
  63. ^ Anderson, Leah Seppanen (February 2006). "European Union Gender Regulations in the East: The Czech and Polish Accession Process". East European Politics and Societies: and Cultures. 20 (1): 101–125. doi:10.1177/0888325405284314. ISSN 0888-3254.
  64. ^ Šárovec, Daniel (2024-11-01). "Theoretical debate on party digitalization: The case of the Czech Republic". Central European Journal of Politics. 10. doi:10.21062/cejp.2024.002. ISSN 2464-479X.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:YettaYettaYetta/sandbox&oldid=1292845083"