Jump to content

User:WeatherWriter/Logic Archive

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is a page for me to store my reasoning for different things so if an editor has a question about some big edit, they can come here and see my reasoning behind it. The author of this page knows and is aware of the Post-1992 US Politics & COVID Misinformation T-Ban he is under. Edits on this page may reference items blocked, but they will not say to edit or do any edits that are a violation of the Post-1992 T-Ban. The purpose of this page is to allow Elijahandskip to verbally (Written, but verbally for Wikipedia) let editors know his reason/logic before and about certain edits.

Please do not reference this page for t-ban violations or template the author for edits done on this page.

So here is my logic reasoning to why Piggy Bank Bandit is ok for main space.

  1. 8 sources, which include local branches from major RS (Fox News & ABC News). It also includes 6 local sources, which don’t have a listing at WP:RS, however, local is probably reliable. 1 source is also out of state.
  2. Lasting impact: 4 jurisdictions have been involved now including the FBI. Once the FBI is involved, it passes the “run-of-the-mill” event mark as it involves tons of police jurisdictions. Also the FBI dubbed them “Piggy Bank Bandit” and a run-of-the-mill bank robber doesn’t get a nickname from the FBI.
  1. Article was created without a violation done to the t-ban. (Reminder for myself and others, my t-ban is "content, not page." I am allowed to continue editing the article EVEN if a statement is made by a US Politician about the shooting, because the article's concept is a mass shooting, which is not covered by my t-ban.)
  2. NOTE TO SELF: Do not edit or move around anything relating to or from a US Politician comment about the shooting.

Per a discussion on Spartaz’s talk page (An admin talk page), I am allowed to remove/interact in this discussion that use Wikipedia:Not every single thing Donald Trump does deserves an article as an analogy and as long as the discussion itself does not reference post 1992 US Politics.

Per my t-ban rules, it is "Content based not page based". He is not a US Politician. Even though his article, Mustafa Al-Kadhimi, mentions US Politics, my edit does not involve US politics, so it is a good edit that does not violate my t-ban.

I added the 2022 Al-Hasakah prison attack to the List of wars: 2003–present in this edit. The US military is involved as a US fighter plane launched 2 airstrikes. At the time of my addition, the article had 0 references to US politics, meaning my Post 1992-US Politics tban was not in effect during that edit.