Jump to content

User:Vipul/Timeline of Google Search

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Google Search, offered by Google, is the most widely used search engine on the World Wide Web as of 2014, with over three billion searches a day. This page covers key events in the history of Google's search service.

For a history of Google the company, including all of Google's products, acquisitions, and corporate changes, see the history of Google page.

Year Month and date (if available) Event type Event
1996 March Prelude Larry Page and Sergey Brin, graduate students in computer science at Stanford University, begin working on BackRub, the precursor to Google Search. Page begins work alone initially, supported by a National Science Foundation Graduate Fellowship, and Brin joins him shortly thereafter. The project is an outgrowth of their work on the Stanford Digital Library Project.[1][2][3][4] Web crawling begins in March.
1997 September 15 Domain The domain Google.com is registered.[5]
2000 May 9 Internationalization Google adds ten new languages: French, German, Italian, Swedish, Finnish, Spanish, Portuguese, Dutch, Norwegian and Danish.
2000 September 12 Internationalization Google launches search services in Japanese, Chinese, and Korean.[6]
2000 October Advertising Google AdWords launches with 350 customers.[5]
2000 December User experience Google Toolbar is released, allowing people to search without visiting the Google homepage, and also offering them more information about the webpages they visit.[5] Some commentators have argued that this marks the beginning of search engine optimization and the Google Dance.[7]
2001 July Search category Google launches Google Image Search with over 250 million images in its search database.[5]
2001 December Review Google releases its first annual Google Zeitgeist.[5]
2002 September Search category Google launches Google News.[5]
2002 September Search algorithm update Google makes the first publicly announced update to its search algorithm.[7] A number of Internet commentators view this as the death of PageRank (the name for Google's system for ranking pages) and a significant decline in the quality of Google's search results.[8][9][10]
2003 February Search algorithm update Google announces the Boston update at SES Boston.[7]
2003 April Search algorithm update Google announces the Cassandra update. The update claims to crack down on link spam, including mutual links between co-owned websites, as well as hidden text and hidden links.[7][11]
2003 May Search algorithm update Google announces the Dominic update. Commentators believed that the update affected the way backlinks were counted, and many webmasters reported new bots from Google that bounced.[7][12]
2003 June Search algorithm update Google announces what will later turn out to have been the last of its regular monthly updates. This update is called the Esmeralda update.[7][13]
2003 July Search algorithm update Google announces the Fritz update, and also a change to its update policy, as it moves towards continuous rather than batch processing of updates.[7][14][15]
2003 September Search algorithm update Google announces a "supplemental index" in order to be able to index some parts of the web more rapidly.[16] The supplemental index would eventually be scrapped.
2003 November Search algorithm update Google announces the Florida update, which commentators consider game-changing in that it completely destroyed the value of 1990s SEO tactics and ushered in a new era of search engine optimization.[17]
2003 December Search category Google launches Google Print, that would later become Google Books.[5]
2004 January Search algorithm update Google announces the Austin update, to continue with the work of combating SEO tactics that Florida had made good progress on.[7][18][19]
2004 February 17–20 Search algorithm update Google announces the Brandy update, a massive index expansion, Latent Semantic Indexing (LSI), increased attention to anchor text relevance, and the concept of link "neighborhoods."[7][20][21]
2004 October Search category Google launches Google Scholar, its search service for academic publications.[5]
2004 December User experience Google Suggest is introduced as a Google Labs feature.[22][23]
2005 January Search algorithm update To combat link spam, Google, Yahoo! and Microsoft collectively introduce the nofollow attribute.[7][24]
2005 February 2 Search algorithm update Google announces the Allegra update, whose effects are unclear.[7][25][26]
2005 May Search algorithm update Google announces the Bourbon update.[7][27][28][29]
2005 June Webmaster tools Google allows webmasters to submit XML sitemaps via Webmaster Tools, bypassing the need for HTML sitemaps.[7][30]
2005 June User experience Google launches personalized search that automatically taps into users' web histories.[31][32]
2005 June User experience Google launches Google Mobile Web Search.[5]
2005 September Search algorithm update Although Google denies running an update, Matt Cutts clarifies that PageRank was refreshed for some pages recently (with a three-month refresh cycle) causing changes to many site ranks. Observers call this the Gilligan update.[7][33][34]
2005 September–November Search algorithm update Google announces and rolls out the Jagger update in three stages, one in September, one in October, one in November.[7][35][36]
2005 December (rollout continues till March 2006) Search algorithm update Google begins rolling out out the Big Daddy update, continuing for the next few months until March 2006. The update changes URL canonization, site redirects, and related items.[7][37]
2006 May Review Google releases Google Trends to make it easy to visualize the popularity of searches over time.[5]
2007 May 16 Search algorithm update + user experience Google launches Universal Search, integrating traditional search results with results from Google News, Google Image Search, Google Video Search, and other verticals. This is believed to be a major milestone in the user experience.[5][38][7][39]
2007 June Search algorithm update The Buffy update happens. It is not considered a deliberate update, but rather an accumulation of many smaller changes.[40][7][41]
2008 March/April Search algorithm update The Dewey update seems to lead to a large-scale shuffling of results. Some observers believe that Google is pushing its own properties, such as Google Books, but evidence of this is limited.[7][42]
2008 August 25 User experience Google Suggest (later called Autocomplete), originally launched as a Labs feature in December 2004, now becomes part of Google's main site.[22][23][5]
2009 February Search algorithm update The Vince update happens. Matt Cutts calls it a minor change, but some SEO commentators consider it major.[7][43]
2009 February Webmaster tools Google, Microsoft, and Yahoo! announce joint support for tags that help bots identify canonical versions of webpages without affecting human visitors.[44][45]
2009 August 10 (announced), rollout completed and made live June 8, 2010 Search algorithm update Named Caffeine, this update is announced on August 10, 2009. It promises faster crawling, expansion of the index, and a near-real-time integration of indexing and ranking.[7][46][47][48][49] The rollout is made live on June 8, 2010.[50][51][52]
2009 October 26 Search category Google introduces Social Search as a Google Labs feature.[53] The feature is expanded further in late January 2010.[54]
2009 December 7 Search category Google launches real-time search for real-time Twitter feeds, Google News, and other freshly indexed content.[7][55][56]
2010 Late April, early May Search algorithm update The update, named May Day, is an algorithm change affecting the long tail. Foreshadowing Google Panda, the update penalizes sites with large amounts of thin content.[7][57][58]
2010 September 8 User experience Google launches Google Instant, described as a search-before-you-type feature: as users are typing, Google predicts the user's whole search query (using the same technology as in Google Suggest, later called the autocomplete feature) and instantaneously shows results for the top prediction.[59][60][61] Google claims that this is estimated to save 2-5 seconds per search query.[62] SEO commentators initially believe that this will have a major effect on search engine optimization, but soon revise downward their estimate of the impact.[7][63]
2010 November 9 User experience Google launches Instant Previews, a feature where users can view previews of the ranked pages by hovering over the links in the search engine results page.[7][64][65][66]
2010 December 1 Search algorithm update Google updated its algorithm to penalize websites that provided a bad experience to users. The update was motivated by a November 26 New York Times story about a fraudulent company called DecorMyEyes that used the publicity generated by negative customer reviews to rise in the search engine rankings.[7][67][68]
2010 December Search algorithm update (announcement/confirmation) Both Google and Bing (Microsoft's search engine) indicate that they use social signals, including signals from Twitter and Facebook, to rank search results.[7][69][70]
2011 January-February Search algorithm update Foreshadowing Google Panda, Google penalizes Overstock.com and JCPenney for the use of SEO tactics.[7][71][72]
2011 January 28 Search algorithm update Google launches its Attribution algorithm change to better sieve out websites that scrape content. Matt Cutts claims that slightly over 2% of search queries are affected, but less than 0.5% of results change noticeably.[7][73][74]
2011 February 23-24 Search algorithm update Google launches Google Panda, a major update affecting 12% of search queries. The update continues with the earlier work of cracking down on spam, content farms, scrapers, and websites with a high ad-to-content ratio.[7][75][76][77] The rollout is gradual over several months, and Panda will see many further updates.
2011 March 30 User experience, incorporation of user feedback Google launches the +1 button so that users can offer feedback on search results.[78] Commentators liken this to the like button seen on Facebook.[79][80]
2011 April 11 Search algorithm update Google rolls out Panda to all English queries worldwide (not limited to English-speaking countries) and integrates new signals into its ranking algorithm.[7][81][82]
2011 May 9 Search algorithm update Google rolls out further minor updates to Panda but does not discuss them in detail, saying they are more like Panda 2.1 than Panda 3.0.[7][83][84]
2011 June 2 Webmaster tools Google, Yahoo!, and Microsoft announce Schema.org, a joint initiative that supports a richer range of tags that websites can use to convey better information.[85][7][86][87]
2011 June 21 Search algorithm update Google rolls out Panda 2.2.[7][88][89][90]
2011 July 23 Search algorithm update Google rolls out Panda 2.3.[7][91]
2011 August 12 Search algorithm update Google rolls out Panda 2.4, making Panda available in all languages around the world, except Chinese, Japanese, and Korean.[7][92][93]
2011 August 16 User experience Google rolls out expanded sitelinks, starting with 12-pack links (but later reducing to 6-pack).[94][95][7]
2011 September 15 Webmaster tools Google rolls out pagination elements for websites to communicate to Google that various webpages are different pages of the same article.[96][97][7]
2011 September 30 Search algorithm update Google rolls out Panda 2.5.[7][98] Although the specifics of the update are unclear, a few sites gain significantly and a few others lose significantly.[99] Other minor flux updates occur on October 3, October 5 and October 13, and some commentators call these Panda 3.0 and 3.1.[7][100]
2011 October 18 User experience, SEO data Google announces that they will start encrypting all search queries for security purposes.[101] This disrupts organic keyword referral data for many websites, making search engine optimization harder.[102]
2011 November 3 Search algorithm update Google announces a Freshness update that would give priority to fresher, more recent search results, and claims this could affect 35% of search queries.[103][104][105] The algorithm largely affects time-sensitive queries. A number of sites gain and many others lose as a result of the update.[106]
2011 November 18 Search algorithm update Google releases an allegedly minor Panda update, which SEO commentators label as Panda 3.1, despite the lack of a generally agreed upon update named Panda 3.0.[7][107][108]
2012 December 2011-January 2012 (announced January 5) Search algorithm update, user experience A 30-change pack of updates, including landing-page quality detection, more relevant site-links, more rich snippets, and related-query improvements.[109]
2012 January 10 Search algorithm update, user experience Google launches Search Plus Your World, a deep integration of one's social data into search.[110][111]SEO commentators are critical of how the search results favor Google+ and push it to users, compared to more widely used social networks such as Facebook and Twitter.[112][113][114][115]
2012 January 19 Search algorithm update Google updates its algorithm to introduce a penalty for websites with too many ads "above the fold". The update has no name, but some SEOs use "Top Heavy" to describe the update.[7][116]
2012 February 27 Search algorithm update The update, codenamed Venice, was announced as part of Google's end-of-February 40-pack update. Venice seemed to give substantially increased weightage to local results (location inferred from the user's IP and other signals) for many search queries, such as those looking for businesses of various types in the vicinity.[7]Cite error: A <ref> tag is missing the closing </ref> (see the help page).

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Brin, Sergey; Page, Lawrence (1998). "The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine". Computer Networks and ISDN Systems. 35 (1–7): 3. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.109.4049. doi:10.1016/S0169-7552(98)00110-X. Retrieved July 24, 2008. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |year= / |date= mismatch (help)
  2. ^ Brin, Sergey (1998). "What can you do with a web in your pocket". Data Engineering Bulletin. 21: 37–47. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.107.7614. Retrieved July 24, 2009. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  3. ^ The Stanford Integrated Digital Library Project, Award Abstract #9411306, September 1, 1994 through August 31, 1999 (Estimated), award amount $521,111,001
  4. ^ Mervish, Jeffrey (January 2, 2009). "NSF Rethinks Its Digital Library". Science. 323 (5910): 54–58. doi:10.1126/science.323.5910.54. PMID 19119211.
  5. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l "Our history in depth". September 15, 1997. Retrieved February 1, 2014.
  6. ^ "Google Launches New Japanese, Chinese, and Korean Search Services: Company Continues Aggressive Global Expansion To Bring Award-Winning Search Engine To Internet Users Worldwide". Google. September 12, 2000. Retrieved February 1, 2014.
  7. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab ac ad ae af ag ah ai aj ak al am an ao ap aq "Google Algorithm Change History". SEOMoz. Retrieved February 1, 2014.
  8. ^ "September, 2002 Google Update Discussion - Part 1". Google News Archive Forum. February 1, 2014.
  9. ^ "Dancing the Google Dance: And a One Algo Change, Two Algo Change, Go!". Level343.com. March 14, 2011. Retrieved February 1, 2014.
  10. ^ Boutin, Paul (October 5, 2002). "Google Degraded? Geeks Aghast". Wired Magazine. Retrieved February 1, 2014.
  11. ^ "Cassandra: Google update algo analysis thread. NO whining or cheering about how your site is doing in this one". WebmasterWorld (forum). Retrieved February 1, 2014.
  12. ^ "Understanding Dominic - Part 2". WebmasterWorld (forum). Retrieved February 1, 2014.
  13. ^ "Google Update Esmeralda". June 24, 2003. Retrieved February 1, 2014.
  14. ^ "Explaining algorithm updates and data refreshes".
  15. ^ Levy, Steven (February 22, 2010). "Exclusive: How Google's Algorithm Rules the Web". Wired Magazine. Retrieved February 1, 2014.
  16. ^ Sullivan, Danny (September 2, 2003). "Search Engine Size Wars & Google's Supplemental Results". Search Engine Watch. Retrieved February 1, 2014.
  17. ^ Sullivan, Danny (December 6, 2003). "What Happened To My Site On Google?". Search Engine Watch. Retrieved February 1, 2014.
  18. ^ "The latest on update Austin (Google's January update)". Search Engine Journal. January 31, 2004. Retrieved February 1, 2014.
  19. ^ Wall, Aaron (January 2004). "Google Update Austin: Google Update Florida Again". Search Marketing Journal. Retrieved February 1, 2014.
  20. ^ French, Garrett (February 17, 2004). "Google's Brandy Update Exposed". WebProNews. Retrieved February 1, 2014.
  21. ^ "How To Beat Google's 'Brandy' Update". Sitepoint. March 8, 2004. Retrieved February 1, 2014.
  22. ^ a b Sullivan, Danny (August 25, 2008). "Google.com Finally Gets Google Suggest Feature". Search Engine Land. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  23. ^ a b "At a loss for words?". Official Google Blog. August 25, 2008. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  24. ^ Sullivan, Danny (January 18, 2005). "Google, Yahoo, MSN Unite On Support For Nofollow Attribute For Links". Search Engine Watch. Retrieved February 1, 2014.
  25. ^ Sullivan, Danny (February 10, 2005). "Google's Feb. 2005 Update". Search Engine Watch. Retrieved February 1, 2014.
  26. ^ "Update Allegra - Google Update 2-2-2005". Webmaster World (forum). Retrieved February 1, 2014.
  27. ^ Battelle, John (June 1, 2005). "Google Update "Bourbon"". Battelle Media. Retrieved February 1, 2014.
  28. ^ Schwartz, Barry (June 27, 2005). "Bourbon Update Survival Kit". Search Engine Roundtable. Retrieved February 1, 2014.
  29. ^ Price, Gary (June 1, 2005). "GoogleGuy Shares Advice About May 2005 "Bourbon" Update". Search Engine Watch. Retrieved February 1, 2014.
  30. ^ Sullivan, Danny (June 2, 2005). "New "Google Sitemaps" Web Page Feed Program". Search Engine Watch. Retrieved February 1, 2014.
  31. ^ "Search gets personal". Google blog. June 28, 2005. Retrieved February 1, 2014.
  32. ^ Sullivan, Danny (June 28, 2005). "Google Relaunches Personal Search - This Time, It Really Is Personal". Search Engine Watch. Retrieved February 1, 2014.
  33. ^ Cutts, Matt (September 8, 2005). "What's an update?". Retrieved February 1, 2014.
  34. ^ Sullivan, Danny (September 9, 2005). "Google's Cutts Says Not An Update - I Say An Update, Just Not A Dance". Search Engine Watch. Retrieved February 1, 2014.
  35. ^ Pfeiffer, Ben (October 26, 2005). "A Review Of The Jagger 2 Update". Search Engine Roundtable. Retrieved February 1, 2014.
  36. ^ "Dealing With Consequences of Jagger Update: Your site dropped? Lost rankings? What to do now?". Webmaster World (forum). Retrieved February 1, 2014.
  37. ^ Cutts, Matt (May 16, 2006). "Indexing timeline". Retrieved February 1, 2014.
  38. ^ Mayer, Marissa (May 16, 2007). "Universal search: The best answer is still the best answer". Official Google Blog. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  39. ^ Sullivan, Danny (May 16, 2007). "Google Launches "Universal Search" & Blended Results". Search Engine Land. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  40. ^ Cutts, Matt (June 17, 2007). "SMX Seattle wrap-up". Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  41. ^ Schwartz, Barry (June 18, 2007). "Google "Buffy" Update - June Google.com Update". Search Engine Roundtable. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  42. ^ Schwartz, Barry (April 2, 2008). "Google's Cutts Asking for Feedback on March/April '08 Update (The "Dewey" Update)". Search Engine Roundtable. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  43. ^ Schwartz, Barry (March 5, 2009). "Google's Vince Update Produces Big Brand Rankings; Google Calls It A Trust "Change"". Search Engine Land. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  44. ^ Cutts, Matt (February 15, 2009). "Learn about the Canonical Link Element in 5 minutes". Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  45. ^ Fishkin, Rand (February 13, 2009). "Canonical URL Tag - The Most Important Advancement in SEO Practices Since Sitemaps". SEOmoz. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  46. ^ "Help test some next-generation infrastructure". Google Webmaster Central Blog. August 10, 2009. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  47. ^ Parr, Ben (August 10, 2009). "Google Caffeine: A Detailed Test of the New Google". Mashable. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  48. ^ Siegler, MG (August 10, 2009). "Caffeine: It's Google On Red Bull, Or Something". TechCrunch. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  49. ^ Schoenfeld, Erick (December 28, 2009). "Google Is About To Get Caffeinated With A Faster Search Index". TechCrunch. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  50. ^ [hhttp://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/our-new-search-index-caffeine.html "Our new search index: Caffeine"]. Official Google Blog. June 8, 2010. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  51. ^ Siegler, MG (June 8, 2010). "Caffeine: Google Finally Brews Its New Pot Of Web Results — 50% Fresher". TechCrunch. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  52. ^ Fox, Vanessa (Jnue 8, 2010). "Google's New Indexing Infrastructure "Caffeine" Now Live". Search Engine Land. Retrieved February 2, 2014. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  53. ^ "Introducing Google Social Search: I finally found my friend's New York blog!". Official Google Blog. October 26, 2009. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  54. ^ Heymans, Maureen (January 27, 2010). "Search is getting more social". Official Google Blog. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  55. ^ "Relevance meets the real-time web". Official Google Blog. December 7, 2009. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  56. ^ Sullivan, Danny (December 7, 2009). "Google Launches Real Time Search Results". Search Engine Land. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  57. ^ Fox, Vanessa (May 27, 2010). "Google Confirms "Mayday" Update Impacts Long Tail Traffic". Search Engine Land. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  58. ^ Schwartz, Barry (May 30, 2010). "Video: Google's Matt Cutts On May Day Update". Search Engine Roundtable. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  59. ^ "Search: now faster than the speed of type". Official Google Blog. September 8, 2010. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  60. ^ Tsotsis, Alexia (September 8, 2010). "Google Instant: It Searches Before You Type". TechCrunch. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  61. ^ "Google Instant, behind the scenes". Official Google Blog. September 9, 2010. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  62. ^ "About Google Instant". Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  63. ^ Fishkin, Rand (September 21, 2010). "Google Instant: Fewer Changes to SEO than the Average Algo Update". SEOMoz. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  64. ^ "Beyond Instant results: Instant Previews". Official Google Blog. November 9, 2010. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  65. ^ Parr, Ben (November 9, 2010). "Google Now Lets You Preview Search Results Before You Click Them". Mashable. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  66. ^ Siegler, MG (November 9, 2010). "Google Instant Previews: Get Ready To Be 5% More Likely Satisfied With Google Search". TechCrunch. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  67. ^ Singhal, Amit (December 1, 2010). "Being bad to your customers is bad for business". Official Google Blog. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  68. ^ Segal, David (November 26, 2010). "A Bully Finds a Pulpit on the Web". New York Times. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  69. ^ Sullivan, Danny (December 1, 2010). "What Social Signals Do Google & Bing Really Count?". Search Engine Land. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  70. ^ Schwartz, Barry (December 20, 2010). "Google Webmaster Video Reconfirms Use Of Social Signals". Search Engine Land. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  71. ^ "Overstock.com's Google Rankings - Too Good?". Google SEO News & Discussion Forum, Webmaster World. January 12, 2011. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  72. ^ Efrati, Amir (February 24, 2011). "Google Penalizes Overstock for Search Tactics". Wall Street Journal. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  73. ^ Cutts, Matt (January 28, 2011). "Algorithm change launched". Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  74. ^ Harry, David (January 31, 2011). "It's all about attribution". Search News Central. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  75. ^ Singhal, Amit; Cutts, Matt (February 24, 2011). "Finding more high-quality sites in search". Official Google Blog. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  76. ^ Levy, Steven (March 3, 2011). "TED 2011: The 'Panda' That Hates Farms: A Q&A With Google's Top Search Engineers". Wired Magazine. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  77. ^ "How Google Panda & Places Updates Created A Rollercoaster Ride For IYP Traffic". Search Engine Land. November 21, 2011. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  78. ^ "The +1 Button: Show appreciation for things you like on the web". Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  79. ^ Sullivan, Danny (March 30, 2011). "Meet +1: Google's Answer To The Facebook Like Button". Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  80. ^ Siegler, MG (March 30, 2011). "With +1, Google Search Goes Truly Social — As Do Google Ads". TechCrunch. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  81. ^ Singhal, Amit (April 11, 2011). "High-quality sites algorithm goes global, incorporates user feedback". Google Webmaster Central blog. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  82. ^ Fox, Vanessa (April 11, 2011). "Panda 2.0: Google Rolls Out Panda Update Internationally & Incorporates Searcher Blocking Data". Search Engine Land. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  83. ^ Sullivan, Danny (May 10, 2011). "It's Panda Update 2.1, Not Panda 3.0, Google Says". Search Engine Land. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  84. ^ Schwartz, Barry (May 9, 2011). "Google Panda 3.0". Search Engine Roundtable. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  85. ^ Fox, Vanessa (June 2, 2011). "Schema.org: Google, Bing & Yahoo Unite To Make Search Listings Richer Through Structured Data". Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  86. ^ Guha, Ramanathan (June 2, 2011). "Introducing schema.org: Search engines come together for a richer web". Official Google Blog. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  87. ^ Empson, Rip (June 2, 2011). "Google, Yahoo, And Bing Collaborate On Structured Data To Make Search Listings Richer". TechCrunch. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  88. ^ Schwartz, Barry (June 21, 2011). "Official: Google Panda Update 2.2 Is Live". Search Engine Land. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  89. ^ Sullivan, Danny (June 21, 2011). "Why Google Panda Is More A Ranking Factor Than Algorithm Update". Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  90. ^ Enge, Eric (July 12, 2011). "A Holistic Look at Panda with Vanessa Fox". Stone Temple. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  91. ^ Schwartz, Barry (July 26, 2011). "Official: Google Panda 2.3 Update Is Live". Search Engine Land. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  92. ^ Singhal, Amit (August 12, 2011). "High-quality sites algorithm launched in additional languages". Official Google Blog. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  93. ^ Fox, Vanessa (August 12, 2011). "Google Panda Update 2.4: Panda Goes International, In Most Languages". Search Engine Land. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  94. ^ Rocha, Daniel (August 16, 2011). "The evolution of sitelinks: expanded and improved". Inside Search (the official Google Search blog). Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  95. ^ Schwartz, Barry (August 16, 2011). "Official: Google Sitelinks Expands To 12 Pack". Search Engine Land. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  96. ^ Li, Benjia; Kupke, Joachim (September 15, 2011). "Pagination with rel="next" and rel="prev"". Google Webmaster Central Blog. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  97. ^ Fox, Vanessa (September 15, 2011). "Google Provides New Options for Paginated Content". Search Engine Land. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  98. ^ McGee, Matt (September 30, 2011). "Confirmed: Google Panda 2.5 Update Arrived This Week". Search Engine Land. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  99. ^ Sullivan, Danny (October 1, 2011). "Google Panda 2.5: Losers Include Today Show, The Next Web; Winners Include YouTube, Fox News". Search Engine Land. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  100. ^ Fox, Vanessa (October 19, 2011). "Panda Update 3.0 Live & Panda "Flux"". Search Engine Land. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  101. ^ Kao, Evelyn (October 18, 2011). "Making search more secure". Official Google Blog. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  102. ^ Wheeler, Aaron (October 21, 2011). "Google Hides Search Referral Data with New SSL Implementation - Emergency Whiteboard Friday". SEOMoz. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  103. ^ Singhal, Amit (November 3, 2011). "Giving you fresher, more recent search results". Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  104. ^ Schwartz, Barry (November 3, 2011). "Google Search Algorithm Change For Freshness To Impact 35% Of Searches; Twitter Firehose Remains Off". Search Engine Land. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  105. ^ Perez, Sarah (November 3, 2011). "Google's New Algorithm Update Impacts 35% Of Searches". TechCrunch. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  106. ^ Perez, Sarah (November 7, 2011). "The Winners & Losers Of Google's Freshness Update Revealed". TechCrunch. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  107. ^ Schwartz, Barry (November 21, 2011). "Google Panda Update 3.1: "Minor" One Made Live On November 18th". Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  108. ^ Schwartz, Barry (November 21, 2011). "Google Panda 3.1 Update : 11/18". Search Engine Roundtable. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  109. ^ Nayak, Pandu (January 5, 2012). "30 search quality highlights (with codenames!): December". Inside Search: The official Google Search blog. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  110. ^ Singhal, Amit (January 10, 2012). "Search, plus Your World". Official Google Blog. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  111. ^ Ulanoff, Lance (January 10, 2012). "Google Merges Search and Google+ Into Social Media Juggernaut". Mashable. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  112. ^ Sullivan, Danny (January 11, 2012). "Real-Life Examples Of How Google's "Search Plus" Pushes Google+ Over Relevancy". Search Engine Land. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  113. ^ Sullivan, Danny (January 11, 2012). "Twitter Cries Foul Over Google "@WWE" Search, But Google Still Beats Bing". Marketing Land. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  114. ^ Lardinois, Frederic (January 10, 2012). ""Search Plus Your World" Is Just About Google+, Not Your World". TechCrunch. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  115. ^ Kessler, Sarah (January 13, 2012). "Why Google's Social Search Is Too Much, Too Soon". Mashable. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
  116. ^ Cutts, Matt (January 19, 2012). "Page layout algorithm improvement". Inside Search: The official Google Search blog. Retrieved February 2, 2014.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Vipul/Timeline_of_Google_Search&oldid=1168399525"