User:Sngriffi/sandbox
Skills required for proficient reading
[edit]![]() | The examples and perspective in this section may not represent a worldwide view of the subject. (July 2010) |
According to the report by the US National Reading Panel (NRP) in 2000,[1][2] the skills required for proficient reading are phonemic awareness, fluency,[3] vocabulary,[4] and text comprehension.[5][6][7] More generally, proficient reading does not necessarily requires phonemic awareness, as in Latin Alphabets, but an awareness of the individual parts of speech which may also include the whole word (as in Chinese characters) or syllables (as in Japanese) as well as others depending on the writing system being employed. Other important skills are: rapid automatized naming (RAN),[8][9] a general understanding of the Orthography of the language .[10][11] and practice.[12][13]
- Speech Awareness: The awareness of individual parts of speech as they apply to individual written characters is crucial for understanding reading (as defined by translating written characters into spoken language). Phonological awareness, which includes the manipulation of rhymes, syllables, and onsets and rimes, is most prevalent in Alphabetic systems.[14] The important part of speech depends on the Writing system employed.
- Fluency: The ability to read orally with speed, accuracy, and vocal expression. The ability to read fluently is one of several critical factors necessary for reading comprehension. If a reader is not fluent, it may be difficult to remember what has been read and to relate the ideas expressed in the text to his or her background knowledge. This accuracy and automaticity of reading serves as a bridge between decoding and comprehension.[3]
- Vocabulary: A critical aspect of reading comprehension is vocabulary development.[4] When a reader encounters an unfamiliar word in print and decodes it to derive its spoken pronunciation, the reader understands the word if it is in the reader's spoken vocabulary. Otherwise, the reader must derive the meaning of the word using another strategy, such as context. If the development of the child's vocabulary is impeded by things such as ear infections, that inhibit the child from hearing new words consistently, then the development of reading will also be impaired.[15]
- Reading comprehension: The NRP describes comprehension as a complex cognitive process in which a reader intentionally and interactively engages with the text. Reading comprehension is heavily dependent on skilled word recognition and decoding, oral reading fluency, a well-developed vocabulary and active engagement with the text.[5]
- Rapid automatized naming: The ability to say quickly the names of letters, objects and colors predicts an individual's ability to read. This might be linked to the importance of quick retrieval of phonological representations from long-term memory in reading and the importance of object-naming circuits in the left cerebral hemisphere that are recruited to underpin a child's word-recognition abilities.[8][9]
- Orthography: means to write correctly. ".[16] Orthographic Development proceeds in increasing complexity as a child learns to read. Some of the first things to be learnt are the orthographic conventions such as the direction of reading and that there are differing typefaces and capitalization for each symbol.[10] In general, this means that to read proficiently, the reader has to understand elements of the written language including hyphenation, capitalization, word breaks, emphasis, and punctuation.[11] Orthography thus describes or defines the set of symbols used in a language, and the rules about how to write these symbols.
- Practice: repeated exposure to print improves many aspects of learning to read and most importantly the knowledge of individual words. It increases the speed at which high frequency words are recognized which allows for increased Fluency in reading. It also supports orthographic development,[12] Reading comprehension and Vocabulary development.[13]
Methods of teaching reading
[edit]Educators have argued for years about which method is best to teach reading to children. There are two major methods Phonics and Whole Language within which there are subtypes Synthetic Phonics and Sight word respectively. Each method is employed at differing rates depending on the country and the specific school division. Recent research has shown that there may actually be a benefit in using the two methods in conjunction with each other to maximize their differing benefits.[13]
Phonics is a teaching method that stresses letter-sound correspondences, specific rules and their use in reading and spelling.[17][18][19][20][13] This helps beginning readers understand how letters are linked to sounds (phonemes), patterns of letter-sound correspondences and spelling in English, and how to apply this knowledge when they read to sound out words. Phonics teachers present the spellings for different sounds in a specific order, introducing the simplest (or most useful) patterns early on; these patterns are then practiced[13] A disadvantage to phonics is that in English, there is a complex letter-sound correspondence and this causes confusion for beginning readers.[21]
Traditional phonics instruction has marked benefits. Early reading often involves significant expansion of a child's mental lexicon, which includes words and their meanings. By focusing on the principle of linking specific sounds and letters, the child has the ability to recognize new words and derive meaning from them. Being able to adapt what they know about language to new words they experience is crucial to expanding their mental lexicon; this allows for productive reading that is the ability to read new words.[13][21] It also produces higher achievement for beginning readers and the difference is the greatest for those at risk of failing to learn to read. Overall, children who are directly taught phonics are better at reading, spelling and comprehension.[13]
Traditional phonics instruction can also have the unintended consequence of promoting dysfluency. The difficulty lies in the coarticulated nature of speech; speech sounds are overlapping,[22] while print is discrete and sequential. This can be appreciated if one shapes the mouth in position to begin to produce the word cat compared to the word cot. The initial hard c is colored by the subsequent vowel even before speech begins, i.e., the smiling position as one prepares to say cat, and the more limp position as one prepares to say cot. As early readers work from left to right, beginning with the onset consonant, they typically do not yet know the vowel with which it must be coarticulated. The vowel sound itself cannot be known until the remaining rime (the portion of the syllable beginning with the vowel and extending to its end: e.g. ight in right) is fully encountered. For these reasons, teaching reading through orientation to rime first and then adding the onset (ought-bought) can be helpful in promoting fluency through supporting the phonological problems of coarticulation. Emphasis on the rime also supports the development of an intuitive, and therefore more fluent, awareness of orthographic patterns.[23]
Phonics is important because, as research has shown, understanding how letters relate to specific sounds in words is makes a large impact on the child's overall achievement.[13] While some children are able to infer these rules on their own, most need explicit instruction on phonics rules or their reading, comprehension, and spelling will suffer. Research has shown that mentally sounding out words is critical in silent reading, even for highly skilled readers.[13]
Synthetic Phonics is a method that is endorsed by the governments of The United Kingdom,[24] Australia[25] and Scotland.[26] It also has considerable support in the U.S.A[27] and Canada.[28] In Synthetic Phonics, the student first learns to say the sounds (phonemes) that are associated with the letters (graphemes) in isolation and first before the sounds are "synthesized" or blended together to make a word. (e.g. /a/, /k/, /t/.) Then, when reading a word, he learns to say each sound in the word (e.g. /k/ - /a/ - /t/); and to "blend" these sounds into a pronunciation of the word (e.g. "cat").
Synthetic phonics does not teach whole words as shapes; and does not involve guessing at words from context, picture and initial letter clues.
There are other types of phonics, such as Analytical phonics, that differ in their approach based on how a "chunk" within the word is defined (i.e. individual phonemes, syllables, or non-blended units).
Whole Language is widely used in the U.S.A. and Canada. It is a reading and learning method that trains students to focus on words, sentences and paragraphs as a whole rather than letters. This method aims to make reading fun and keep children motivated, which is beneficial because learning to read depends heavily on what the student does and not what the teachers does.[13] While the child is typically very engaged in this method, many children struggle to infer the specific rules of the language on their own, which causes the child's comprehension and spelling to suffer in the end.
One subtype is Sight word, which is sometimes called the "look-say" method. A sight vocabulary of 50-100 words is first memorized [21] and subsequent words are learned as wholes, often by seeing them used repeatedly in the context of a story.[13] It tells children to find meaning by guessing, by recognizing whole words they have memorized, by looking at the pictures, and by creating a context based on surrounding words. It encourages students to "construct their own meaning" (with guidance from peers and facilitator of consensus process).[29] It relies heavily on the child's experience with language as a whole. The following are some features of the whole language philosophy:[30]
- Children are expected to learn to read and write as they learned to talk, that is gradually, without a great deal of direct instruction.
- Learning is emphasized more than teaching; it is assumed that the children will learn to read and write, and the teacher facilitates that growth.
- Children read and write every day; and they are not asked to read artificially simplified or contrived language.
- Reading, writing, and oral language are not considered separate components of the curriculum or merely ends in themselves; rather they permeate everything the children are doing.
- There is no division between first learning to read and later reading to learn. (adapted from Weaver, C. 1990)
Which style use in teaching reading has divided educators for years. It is now known that using the two approaches together is more powerful than either program alone.[13] The technical skills learned through phonics is irreplaceable when it comes to learning to read, spell, and general language comprehension but the engagement of children with language in the whole-language style is also important to keep the children motivated and excited to learn.
References
[edit]- ^ "National Reading Panel (NRP) - Publications and Materials - Summary Report". National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. 2000.
- ^ "National Reading Panel (NRP) - Publications and Materials - Reports of the Subgroups". National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: an evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups (NIH Publication No. 00-4754). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. 2000.
- ^ a b Rasinski, T. "Assessing Reading Fluency". Pacific Resources for Education and Learning. Retrieved 2007-10-21.
- ^ a b Justice, Laura (April 2002). "Word Exposure Conditions and Preschoolers' Novel Word Learning During Shared Storybook Reading". Reading Psychology. 23 (2): 87–106. doi:10.1080/027027102760351016.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: date and year (link) - ^ a b Fien, Hank (2010). "An Examination of the Relation of Nonsense Word Fluency Initial Status and Gains to Reading Outcomes for Beginning Readers". School Psychology Review. 39 (4): 631–653. doi:10.1080/02796015.2010.12087747.
{{cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - ^ "Findings and Determinations of the National Reading Panel by Topic Areas". 2006.
- ^ "Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching Children to Read". National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Retrieved 2007-08-15.
- ^ a b Lervåg A, Hulme C. (2009). Rapid automatized naming (RAN) taps a mechanism that places constraints on the development of early reading fluency. Psychol Sci. 20(8):1040-8. PMID 19619178
- ^ a b Denckla MB, Rudel R. (1974). Rapid "automatized" naming of pictured objects, colors, letters and numbers by normal children. Cortex. 10(2):186-202. PMID 4844470
- ^ a b Wolf, Maryanne (2007). Proust and the Squid. New York NY: HarperCollins. pp. 120–121. ISBN 978-0-06-093384-5.
- ^ a b Coulmas, Florian. 1996. The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Writing Systems. Oxford: Blackwell, p. 379.
- ^ a b Wolf, Maryanne (2007). Proust and the Squid. New York NY: HarperCollins. p. 121. ISBN 978-0-06-093384-5.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l Rayner, Keith (November 2001). "How Psychological Science Informs the Teaching of Reading". Psychological Science in the Public Interest. 2 (2): 31–74. doi:10.1111/1529-1006.00004. PMID 26151366.
{{cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help)CS1 maint: date and year (link) - ^ Ehri, Linnea (2001). "Phonemic awareness instruction helps children learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel's meta-analysis". Reading Research Quarterly. 36 (3): 250–287. doi:10.1598/RRQ.36.3.2.
{{cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help); Unknown parameter|month=
ignored (help) - ^ Wolf, Maryanne (2007). Proust and the Squid. New York NY: HarperCollins. pp. 104–105. ISBN 978-0-06-093384-5.
- ^ orthography, Online Etymology Dictionary
- ^ Borowsky R, Esopenko C, Cummine J, Sarty GE (2007). "Neural representations of visual words and objects: a functional MRI study on the modularity of reading and object processing". Brain Topogr. 20 (2): 89–96. doi:10.1007/s10548-007-0034-1. PMID 17929158.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Borowsky R, Cummine J, Owen WJ, Friesen CK, Shih F, Sarty GE (2006). "FMRI of ventral and dorsal processing streams in basic reading processes: insular sensitivity to phonology". Brain Topogr. 18 (4): 233–9. doi:10.1007/s10548-006-0001-2. PMID 16845597.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Sanabria Díaz G, Torres Mdel R, Iglesias J; et al. (November 2009). "Changes in reading strategies in school-age children". Span J Psychol. 12 (2): 441–53. doi:10.1017/s1138741600001827. PMID 19899646.
{{cite journal}}
: Explicit use of et al. in:|author=
(help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Chan ST, Tang SW, Tang KW, Lee WK, Lo SS, Kwong KK (November 2009). "Hierarchical coding of characters in the ventral and dorsal visual streams of Chinese language processing". NeuroImage. 48 (2): 423–35. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.06.078. PMID 19591947.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ a b c Rayner, Keith (March 2002). "How Should Reading be Taught?". Scientific American. 286 (3): 84–91. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0302-84. PMID 11857904.
{{cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help)CS1 maint: date and year (link) - ^ Carello C, LeVasseur VM, Schmidt RC (July 2002). "Movement sequencing and phonological fluency in (putatively) nonimpaired readers". Psychol Sci. 13 (4): 375–9. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2002.00467.x. PMID 12137142.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Cherkes-Julkowski, M. (2005). find the "vawel", Read the Rime, Learn to Read. Apache Junction, AZ: Surviving Education Guides.
- ^ https://www.education.gov.uk/publications/eOrderingDownload/Primary_curriculum_Report.pdf
- ^ http://www.dest.gov.au/nitl/documents/report_recommendations.pdf
- ^ http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2005/02/20682/52383
- ^ http://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/nrp/findings.cfm,
- ^ http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/document/reports/reading/reading.pdf
- ^ http://www.crossroad.to/glossary/education.html#whole
- ^ http://www.sil.org/lingualinks/literacy/ReferenceMaterials/glossaryofliteracyterms/WhatIsTheWholeLanguagePhilosop.htm