Jump to content

User:SigmaJargon/Math5310

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Prof. de Fernex Math 5310


Lemma A

[edit]

If A is a subgroup of G and , then if then .

Proof: Say . Then , since , and so is a generator of . So since , , which is a contradiction.


Lemma B

[edit]

If A is a subgroup of G and , then

Proof: Consider . for all x, and for all y. So . For some x, y, , so .


2.10.1

[edit]

By Lemma A, since A is a subgroup of G and , if then . However, since , p prime, the only element that satisfies this condition is the identity, e. Thus, the only element in common between A and is e, and


2.10.3.a

[edit]

Say . We're guaranteed at least one such number, since . Then by Lemma B, , and so by closure. Thus, , and


2.10.3.b

[edit]

Say . Then for some , . This implies , but this cannot be since . So . Combined with , we conclude that


2.11.3

[edit]

First, show

If , show

Since , so

Thus, , and so , and

Next, show

If , show

Since , or , and thus . Finally, we have , and so


2.11.6

[edit]

All p-Sylow groups are conjugate - that is, since P is a p-Sylow subgroup of G, if Q is a p-Sylow subgroup of G, then . But since P is normal, , so P=Q. Thus, P is the only p-Sylow subgroup of G.


2.11.7

[edit]

I hate to sound displeased with a problem, but we proved this last homework, problem 2.8.5. I'll attach the appropriate page for your viewing pleasure.


2.11.20

[edit]

2.11.20) Consider divides , such that n is as large as possible. Then , and since n maximal, p does not divide m. Then by Sylow's Theorem, G has a subgroup P of order . If m=n, we're done. If m<n, then we show is a subgroup of G by considering that since P is a group of order , it contains a subgroup of order . Note that a subsubgroup is a subgroup, as it contains a subset of elements from the original group and meets the group axioms for the given operation. If n-1=m, we're done. If not, the process can be repeated as many times as needed, eventually showing that G contains a subgroup of order