Prof. de Fernex
Math 5310
If A is a subgroup of G and
, then if
then
.
Proof:
Say
. Then
, since
, and so
is a generator of
. So since
,
, which is a contradiction.
If A is a subgroup of G and
, then
Proof:
Consider
.
for all x, and
for all y. So
. For some x, y,
, so
.
By Lemma A, since A is a subgroup of G and
, if
then
. However, since
, p prime, the only element that satisfies this condition is the identity, e. Thus, the only element in common between A and
is e, and
Say
. We're guaranteed at least one such number, since
. Then by Lemma B,
, and so
by closure. Thus,
, and
Say
. Then for some
,
. This implies
, but this cannot be since
. So
. Combined with
, we conclude that
First, show
If
, show
Since
, so
Thus,
, and so
, and
Next, show
If
, show
Since
, or
, and thus
. Finally, we have
, and so
All p-Sylow groups are conjugate - that is, since P is a p-Sylow subgroup of G, if Q is a p-Sylow subgroup of G, then
. But since P is normal,
, so P=Q. Thus, P is the only p-Sylow subgroup of G.
I hate to sound displeased with a problem, but we proved this last homework, problem 2.8.5. I'll attach the appropriate page for your viewing pleasure.
2.11.20) Consider
divides
, such that n is as large as possible. Then
, and since n maximal, p does not divide m. Then by Sylow's Theorem, G has a subgroup P of order
. If m=n, we're done. If m<n, then we show
is a subgroup of G by considering that since P is a group of order
, it contains a subgroup of order
. Note that a subsubgroup is a subgroup, as it contains a subset of elements from the original group and meets the group axioms for the given operation. If n-1=m, we're done. If not, the process can be repeated as many times as needed, eventually showing that G contains a subgroup of order