User:Rubysteger/Evaluate an Article
 | Evaluate an article
Complete your article evaluation below. Here are the key aspects to consider: Lead sectionA good lead section defines the topic and provides a concise overview. A reader who just wants to identify the topic can read the first sentence. A reader who wants a very brief overview of the most important things about it can read the first paragraph. A reader who wants a quick overview can read the whole lead section.
ContentA good Wikipedia article should cover all the important aspects of a topic, without putting too much weight on one part while neglecting another.
Tone and BalanceWikipedia articles should be written from a neutral point of view; if there are substantial differences of interpretation or controversies among published, reliable sources, those views should be described as fairly as possible.
Sources and ReferencesA Wikipedia article should be based on the best sources available for the topic at hand. When possible, this means academic and peer-reviewed publications or scholarly books.
Organization and writing qualityThe writing should be clear and professional, the content should be organized sensibly into sections.
Images and Media
Talk page discussionThe article's talk page — and any discussions among other Wikipedia editors that have been taking place there — can be a useful window into the state of an article, and might help you focus on important aspects that you didn't think of.
Overall impressions
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved. |
Which article are you evaluating?
[edit]Wikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestling
Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
[edit]I chose this article to evaluate because it showcases how a niche community within Wikipedia organizes and maintains content quality around a specific cultural topic—professional wrestling. The article offers a structured overview of the project’s goals, scope, collaboration tools, and quality assessment systems. This makes it valuable for understanding Wikipedia’s internal practices, editorial standards, and how fan communities contribute to the reliability and comprehensiveness of Wikipedia content.
Evaluate the article
[edit]Structure
[edit]The structure of the article aligns with standard formatting for WikiProject pages. It includes clearly defined sections such as:
- Scope
- Goals
- Task forces
- Article assessment
- Participants
- To-do lists and templates
Each section is organized logically, and the use of subsections helps users navigate the page efficiently. However, the page functions more like a community coordination page rather than a traditional encyclopedic article. As such, it lacks a lead section that summarizes the content for readers unfamiliar with the project, which would be standard in general Wikipedia articles. The layout is functional for its audience, Wikipedians interested in contributing to or learning about wrestling-related articles, but may confuse casual readers who expect a neutral, descriptive narrative.
Neutrality
[edit]The tone of the article is mostly neutral and objective. It does not promote professional wrestling or the community itself but instead describes how the WikiProject operates. However, because it is a coordination page, some language reflects an internal, participatory tone (e.g., “Join us!” or “You can help!”), which is acceptable and even expected in a WikiProject context. Still, it’s important to acknowledge that this tone differs from the neutral point of view (NPOV) expected in encyclopedic entries.
Citations and Sources
[edit]Unlike typical Wikipedia articles, this WikiProject page does not include citations or external references, as its purpose is not to convey researched facts but to organize editor activity. This makes it difficult to evaluate the reliability of the information in the traditional sense. However, internal links to Wikipedia guidelines, article assessment scales, and related WikiProjects help contextualize the page’s content. For readers unfamiliar with Wikipedia’s behind-the-scenes work, this lack of sourcing may reduce perceived credibility or usefulness.
Comprehensiveness
[edit]The article thoroughly outlines the goals and scope of the WikiProject. It defines its purpose, to coordinate and improve professional wrestling-related content, and gives users tools to do so. The inclusion of article quality assessments, task forces, and maintenance templates demonstrates a comprehensive support system for contributors. However, it assumes familiarity with Wikipedia's inner workings. It does not explain terms like “Featured Article” or “Stub,” and thus may not be fully accessible to newer editors or outside researchers who might benefit from greater clarity.
Usefulness
[edit]For its intended audience, Wikipedia editors interested in professional wrestling, this page is extremely useful. It provides clear guidance on how to contribute, assess, and maintain articles related to the topic. It centralizes collaboration and sets standards that improve content consistency across the encyclopedia. However, for general readers or researchers looking for information about professional wrestling or its treatment on Wikipedia, the article would be less informative or accessible.