User talk:Rokas Jegorovas
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Rokas Jegorovas, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Rokas Jegorovas/sandbox, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- Your first article
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- Biographies of living persons
- How to write a great article
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Help pages
- Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --Trialpears (talk) 19:30, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of User:Rokas Jegorovas/sandbox
[edit]
A tag has been placed on User:Rokas Jegorovas/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --Trialpears (talk) 19:30, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
Why speedy deleted?
[edit] | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
I understand that Wikipedia is not a web host and my information is not closely related to Wikipedia's goals, but here are my four reasons why I don't like speedy deletion:
- Normal Wikipedia users like me should be free to post anything on their own user pages or sandboxes, even if their own information is not related to Wikipedia. Exceptions are very harmful vandalism and adult content.
- Why it would be harmful to post something as fictional as detailed fictional climate information on Weatherbox or climate chart? Everyone knows that temperature on Earth cannot reach 70°C or 158°F.
- I don't know any wiki other than Wikipedia where I can post fictional climate on some sort of Weatherbox or climate chart.
- I think that are some users other than me with similar user pages or sandboxes to me. They also post fictional climate charts or Weatherboxes. They don't care that their own information is fictional, and what? Fictional climate information can be sometimes very interesting. Especially to me. Rokas Jegorovas (talk) 09:59, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- You are free to challenge the speedy deletion at WP:DRV, but I think it unlikely to succeed. User pages are not free web space for you to use as you wish, there are certain guidelines which are detailed at WP:USERPAGE. Sandboxes are also not immune from speedy deletions. If you just want to fool around and post fictional information, there are projects like Uncyclopedia and others that allow for more freedom in what you can post.
- You are also free to work to change the user page guidelines on the talk page for them.
- If you see other inappropriate user pages that also do not meet guidelines, you are free to propose them for speedy deletion. Please be mindful of other stuff exists and disrupting Wikipedia to make a point. 331dot (talk) 11:40, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- Do you know what I really want? I don't want to fool around and post fictional information, I only want a sort of space where I can post fictional climate chart or Weatherbox, where I am safe from atleast speedy deletion. Uncyclopedia maybe can allow adult content and very harmful vandalism-like things. I will never propose any user page or sandbox for speedy deletion, because as said above, fictional climate information is what makes my life interesting. Rokas Jegorovas (talk) 12:53, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- I've given you the options that are open to you. Are you going to pursue them, or make any valid contributions to this encyclopedia? 331dot (talk) 12:57, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- I would make some sort of contributions to this Wikipedia. But you still haven't answered my question: Does Uncyclopedia allow adult content and very harmful vandalism-like things? If yes, then please list other sort of wiki not as harmful as Uncyclopedia where user pages or sandboxes are safe from atleast speedy deletion. If not, then I would go to Uncyclopedia. Rokas Jegorovas (talk) 13:09, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- I can't say what Uncyclopedia does or does not allow, as I am only aware of its existence and general purpose. But any place that gives you the freedom to do what it is that you want to do is likely going to permit potentially offensive content or content that would be considered vandalism here. Some other possible venues you may be interested in are listed at WP:OUT, including WikiAlpha which is much more lenient about permitted content. 331dot (talk) 13:15, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you for help very much! Rokas Jegorovas (talk) 13:23, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- I can't say what Uncyclopedia does or does not allow, as I am only aware of its existence and general purpose. But any place that gives you the freedom to do what it is that you want to do is likely going to permit potentially offensive content or content that would be considered vandalism here. Some other possible venues you may be interested in are listed at WP:OUT, including WikiAlpha which is much more lenient about permitted content. 331dot (talk) 13:15, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- I would make some sort of contributions to this Wikipedia. But you still haven't answered my question: Does Uncyclopedia allow adult content and very harmful vandalism-like things? If yes, then please list other sort of wiki not as harmful as Uncyclopedia where user pages or sandboxes are safe from atleast speedy deletion. If not, then I would go to Uncyclopedia. Rokas Jegorovas (talk) 13:09, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- I've given you the options that are open to you. Are you going to pursue them, or make any valid contributions to this encyclopedia? 331dot (talk) 12:57, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- Do you know what I really want? I don't want to fool around and post fictional information, I only want a sort of space where I can post fictional climate chart or Weatherbox, where I am safe from atleast speedy deletion. Uncyclopedia maybe can allow adult content and very harmful vandalism-like things. I will never propose any user page or sandbox for speedy deletion, because as said above, fictional climate information is what makes my life interesting. Rokas Jegorovas (talk) 12:53, 28 August 2019 (UTC)