User:Robo Cop/Sandbox
Full review
[edit]Here we go...
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Criteria needed to pass
[edit]5b - Appropriate use of images with suitable captions.
[edit]- One or two more appropriately tagged images are necessary to help illustrate the article.
- Comments
- All in all, this article is very well done and is very much deserving of a Good Article status.
- One image or two more of the team in action to help illustrate the article would do the trick.
- I will give a deadline of August 1st at 12:00 noon UTC for the needed work to be completed. If the work is completed by then, I will list this as a pass, if not, it will be listed as a fail. The final say will be on the person who gives the second opinion, which will be after this criteria is either met or not. Thank you! MobileSnail 16:47, 16 July 2009 (UTC)