User:Phlsph7/Well-being - Types
Types
[edit]Types of well-being can be categorized by how they are measured, who they belong to, and which domain of life they affect. Some researchers limit their inquiry to one specific type while others investigate the interrelations between different types.[1]
Subjective and objective well-being
[edit]Subjective well-being is the measure of how people feel about and evaluate their own lives. It encompasses both affective and cognitive components. A person has high affective well-being if they have many pleasant experiences and few unpleasant ones. High cognitive well-being occurs when a person evaluate their life positively, making a global assessment that things are going well.[2]
Subjective well-being is measured using questionnaires in which individuals report the quality of their experiences. Single-item measures provide the most simple approach, focusing on a single scale, like asking participants to rate how content they are with their lives on a scale from 1 to 10. Multi-item scales include questions for distinct aspects of subjective well-being, with the advantage of reducing the influence of the wording of any single question. They have separate questions for domains such as the presence of positive affects, the absence of negative affects, and overall life satisfaction, which they combine into a comprehensive index.[3]
Objective well-being encompasses objective factors that a person's life is going well. Unlike subjective well-being, these factors can be assessed and quantified from an external perspective. They include personal, social, economic, and environmental aspects such as health, education, income, housing, leisure, and security.[4]
By relying on objective data, measures of objective well-being are less affected by cultural and personal biases influencing self-reports.[5] However, it is not universally accepted that objective well-being is a form of well-being in the strictest sense. This doubt is based on the idea that well-being is essentially a subjective phenomenon tied to a person's experience. According to this view, objective factors influence and indicate well-being but are not themselves forms of well-being. [6]
Some researchers focus only on subjective or objective well-being. Others combine both perspectives in their inquiry, including questions about how the two are related. It is possible for subjective and objective well-being to diverge. For example, a person may feel subjectively happy despite scoring low on objective measures, like low income and frail health.[7]
Individual and community well-being
[edit]Individual well-being concerns the quality of life of a particular person and is the main focus of disciplines like psychology and philosophy. Community well-being applies the concept of well-being to the state of a group of people. It encompasses a broad range of economic, social, environmental, and cultural aspects that influence how the community functions and thrives while ensuring that community's needs are fulfilled.[8]
One view sees community well-being as the sum of individual well-beings while others emphasize that the relation between the two is more complex. Individual and community well-being often support each other. For instance, high subjective well-being can lead a person to contribute more to their community, and a well-functioning community can make its members happy. However, there can also be tensions, like when changes necessary for community well-being conflict with the individual well-being of certain members.[9]
Closely related to community well-being are categories of well-being defined for specific demographic groups. For instance, child well-being emphasizes health, education, material security, and social development in a loving and nurturing environment. Other examples include women’s, elderly, student, and employee well-being.[10]
Others
[edit]Various types of well-being are categorized based on the domain of life to which they belong. Physical well-being concerns the domain of the body as the capacity to engage in physical activities and the absence of illness and bodily pain. It includes general health considerations and the ability to perform one's social role without being hindered by physical limitations.[11]
Psychological well-being, also called mental health, is a state of mind characterized by internal balance.[a] It involves the absence of disorders and disturbances, together with the abilities to cope with challenging situations, maintain positive relationships, and cultivate personal growth.[13] It is closely linked to intellectual, spiritual, and emotional well-being. Intellectual well-being encompasses well-functioning cognitive abilities and traits, such as critical thinking, problem-solving, and curiosity.[14] Spiritual well-being is a state in which people find purpose in life and have inner peace, self-confidence, and a sense of identity.[15] Emotional well-being involves the capacities to comprehend, articulate, and regulate emotions, together with an overall positive mood.[16][b]
Hedonic well-being refers to a life rich in pleasurable experiences and devoid of suffering. Eudamonic well-being is a form of personal fulfillment in which an individual flourishes by striving for excellence and actualizing their innate potentials.[18]
Social well-being concerns the quality and number of interpersonal connections, including how well a person functions in their social environment and the level of social support available to them.[19] Economic well-being refers to the economic situation of a person, such as the resources and skills they have in regard to income, job opportunities, and financial stability.[20] Further types of well-being include financial, cultural, political, and environmental well-being.[21]
References
[edit]Notes
[edit]Citations
[edit]- ^
- Galvin 2018, p. 2
- Western & Tomaszewski 2016, pp. 1–2
- Lee & Kim 2014, pp. 12
- ^
- Proctor 2023, pp. 6953–6955
- Veenhoven 2008, pp. 45–46
- Diener 1984, pp. 543–544
- Busseri & Sadava 2011, p. 290
- Luhmann, Krasko & Terwiel 2021, p. 1232
- ^
- Diener 1984, pp. 543–546
- Busseri & Sadava 2011, pp. 292
- Dullien et al. 2017, p. 191
- Smith & Clay 2010, p. 159
- ^
- Voukelatou et al. 2021, pp. 279–280
- Boelhouwer & Noll 2023, pp. 4783–4785
- Kubzansky 2020, pp. 222–223
- Western & Tomaszewski 2016, pp. 1–2
- ^ Boelhouwer & Noll 2023, p. 4784
- ^
- Rojas 2017, pp. 43–44
- Boelhouwer & Noll 2023, p. 4784
- Kubzansky 2020, pp. 222–223
- ^
- Boelhouwer & Noll 2023, pp. 4784–4785
- Western & Tomaszewski 2016, pp. 1–3
- Smith & Clay 2010, p. 158
- ^
- Lee, Kim & Phillips 2014, pp. 1–2
- Lee & Kim 2014, pp. 10–11
- Crisp 2021, § 1. The Concept
- ^
- Lee & Kim 2014, pp. 12–16
- Dasgupta 2001, p. 21
- VanderWeele 2021, p. 421
- ^
- Helseth & Haraldstad 2014, pp. 746–749
- Sun & Shek 2023, pp. 7697–7698
- Lips & Gordon 2023, pp. 7762–7763
- Mascherini 2023, pp. 7660–7661
- Dsouza, Chakraborty & Kamath 2023, pp. 1–2
- ^
- Capio, Sit & Abernethy 2023, pp. 5179–5180
- Bharti 2024, p. 27
- Tavanti 2023, p. 443
- ^ Rodman & Fry 2009, p. 10
- ^
- ^ Tavanti 2023, p. 444
- ^
- Alorani & Alradaydeh 2018, p. 291
- Cordella & Poiani 2021, p. 42
- Tavanti 2023, p. 444
- ^
- Tavanti 2023, p. 444
- Park et al. 2023, p. 13
- ^ Park et al. 2023, pp. 11–14
- ^
- Niemiec 2023, pp. 2212–2213
- Yamaguchi & Halberstadt 2011, p. 96
- ^
- Cicognani 2023, p. 6714
- Tavanti 2023, p. 443
- ^
- Krause 2016, p. 114
- Tavanti 2023, p. 443
- ^
- Tavanti 2023, pp. 443–444
- Volkov et al. 2023, p. S141
- de Oliveira Cardoso et al. 2023, p. 2913
Sources
[edit]- Yamaguchi, Mami; Halberstadt, Jamin (2011). "It's All About Me: Maladaptive Self-focused Attention as a Mediator of the Relationship Between Extrinsic Goals and Well-Being". In Brdar, Ingrid (ed.). The Human Pursuit of Well-Being: A Cultural Approach. Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN 978-94-007-1375-8.
- Niemiec, Christopher P. (2023). "Eudaimonic Well-Being". In Maggino, Filomena (ed.). Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Springer. ISBN 978-3-031-17298-4.
- de Oliveira Cardoso, Nicolas; Markus, Juliana; de Lara Machado, Wagner; Guilherme, Alexandre Anselmo (2023). "Measuring Financial Well-Being: A Systematic Review of Psychometric Instruments". Journal of Happiness Studies. 24 (8). doi:10.1007/s10902-023-00697-5.
- Volkov, A. D.; Tishkov, S. V.; Karginova-Gubinova, V. V.; Kolesnikov, N. G. (2023). "Environmental Well-Being of the Russian Arctic Regions: Official Data and Population Estimates". Regional Research of Russia. 13 (1). doi:10.1134/S2079970523600154.
- Krause, Peter (2016). "Quality of Life and Inequality". In Bruni, Luigino; Porta, Pier Luigi (eds.). Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Happiness and Quality of Life. Edward Elgar Publishing. ISBN 978-1-78347-117-1.
- Cicognani, Elvira (2023). "Social Well-Being". In Maggino, Filomena (ed.). Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Springer. ISBN 978-3-031-17298-4.
- Park, Crystal L.; Kubzansky, Laura D.; Chafouleas, Sandra M.; Davidson, Richard J.; Keltner, Dacher; Parsafar, Parisa; Conwell, Yeates; Martin, Michelle Y.; Hanmer, Janel; Wang, Kuan Hong (2023). "Emotional Well-Being: What It Is and Why It Matters". Affective Science. 4 (1). doi:10.1007/s42761-022-00163-0.
- Tavanti, Marco (2023). Developing Sustainability in Organizations: A Values-Based Approach. Springer Nature. ISBN 978-3-031-36907-0.
- Cordella, Marisa; Poiani, Aldo (2021). Fulfilling Ageing: Psychosocial and Communicative Perspectives on Ageing. Springer Nature. ISBN 978-3-030-60071-6.
- Alorani, Omar Ismael; Alradaydeh, Mu’taz Fuad (2018). "Spiritual well-being, perceived social support, and life satisfaction among university students". International Journal of Adolescence and Youth. 23 (3). doi:10.1080/02673843.2017.1352522.
- Luhmann, Maike; Krasko, Julia; Terwiel, Sophia (2021). "Subjective Well-Being as a Dynamic Construct". In Rauthmann, John F. (ed.). The Handbook of Personality Dynamics and Processes. Academic Press. ISBN 978-0-12-813996-7.
- Murphy, Dominic; Donovan, Caitrin; Smart, Gemma Lucy (2020). "Mental Health and Well-Being in Philosophy". In Sholl, Jonathan; Rattan, Suresh I. S. (eds.). Explaining Health Across the Sciences. Springer Nature. ISBN 978-3-030-52663-4.
- Rodman, George; Fry, Katherine G. (2009). "Communication Technology and Psychological Well-being: Yin, Yang, and the Golden Mean of Media Effects". In Amichai-Hamburger, Yair (ed.). Technology and Psychological Well-being. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-88581-2.
- Bharti, Jaya (2024). "2. Effect of Improper Waste Disposal on Environmental, Physical, and Emotional Well-Being of Human Beings". In Rajpal, Ankur; Choudhury, Moharana; Goswami, Srijan; Chakravorty, Arghya; Raghavan, Vimala (eds.). Waste Management and Treatment: Advances and Innovations. CRC Press. ISBN 978-1-000-95217-9.
- Capio, Catherine M.; Sit, Cindy H. P.; Abernethy, Bruce (2023). "Physical Well-Being". In Maggino, Filomena (ed.). Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Springer. ISBN 978-3-031-17298-4.
- Galvin, Kathleen (2018). "Introduction". In Galvin, Kathleen (ed.). Routledge Handbook of Well-Being. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-317-53252-1.
- Dsouza, Josmitha Maria; Chakraborty, Anirban; Kamath, Neetha (2023). "Intergenerational communication and elderly well-being". Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health. 20. doi:10.1016/j.cegh.2023.101251.
- Mascherini, Massimiliano (2023). "Well-Being at Work". In Maggino, Filomena (ed.). Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Springer. ISBN 978-3-031-17298-4.
- Lips, Hilary; Gordon, Alynn (2023). "Women's Well-Being". In Maggino, Filomena (ed.). Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Springer. ISBN 978-3-031-17298-4.
- Sun, Rachel C. F.; Shek, Daniel T. L. (2023). "Well-Being, Student". In Maggino, Filomena (ed.). Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Springer. ISBN 978-3-031-17298-4.
- Helseth, Sølvi; Haraldstad, Kristin (2014). "Child Well-Being". In Michalos, Alex C. (ed.). Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Springer Netherlands. ISBN 978-94-007-0753-5.
- VanderWeele, Tyler J. (2021). "Measures of Community Well-Being: A Template". In Lee, Matthew T.; Kubzansky, Laura D.; VanderWeele, Tyler J. (eds.). Measuring Well-being: Interdisciplinary Perspectives from the Social Sciences and the Humanities. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-751253-1.
- Lee, Seung Jong; Kim, Yunji (2014). "Searching for the Meaning of Community Well-Being". Community Well-Being and Community Development: Conceptions and Applications. Springer. ISBN 978-3-319-12421-6.
- Lee, Seung Jong; Kim, Yunji; Phillips, Rhonda (2014). "Exploring the Intersection of Community Well-Being and Community Development". Community Well-Being and Community Development: Conceptions and Applications. Springer. ISBN 978-3-319-12421-6.
- Kubzansky, Laura D. (2020). "Afterword: The Future of Well-Being". In Plough, Alonzo L. (ed.). Well-Being: Expanding the Definition of Progress: Insights From Practitioners, Researchers, and Innovators From Around the Globe. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-008051-8.
- Dullien, Sebastian; Goodwin, Neva; Harris, Jonathan; Nelson, Julie; Roach, Brian; Torras, Mariano (2017). Macroeconomics in Context: A European Perspective. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-317-28966-1.
- Busseri, Michael A.; Sadava, Stan W. (2011). "A Review of the Tripartite Structure of Subjective Well-Being: Implications for Conceptualization, Operationalization, Analysis, and Synthesis". Personality and Social Psychology Review. 15 (3). doi:10.1177/1088868310391271.
- Diener, Ed (1984). "Subjective Well-Being". Psychological Bulletin. 95 (3). doi:10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.542.
- Dasgupta, Partha (2001). Human Well-Being and the Natural Environment. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-924788-2.
- Veenhoven, Ruut (2008). "Sociological Theories of Subjective Well-Being". In Eid, Michael; Larsen, Randy J. (eds.). The Science of Subjective Well-Being. Guilford Press. ISBN 978-1-60623-073-2.
- Rojas, Mariano (2017). "The Subjective Object of Well-Being Studies: Well-Being as the Experience of Being Well". In Brulé, Gaël; Maggino, Filomena (eds.). Metrics of Subjective Well-Being: Limits and Improvements. Springer. ISBN 978-3-319-61810-4.
- Smith, Courtland; Clay, Patricia (2010). "Measuring Subjective and Objective Well-being: Analyses from Five Marine Commercial Fisheries". Human Organization. 69 (2). doi:10.17730/humo.69.2.b83x6t44878u4782.
- Voukelatou, Vasiliki; Gabrielli, Lorenzo; Miliou, Ioanna; Cresci, Stefano; Sharma, Rajesh; Tesconi, Maurizio; Pappalardo, Luca (2021). "Measuring objective and subjective well-being: dimensions and data sources". International Journal of Data Science and Analytics. 11 (4). doi:10.1007/s41060-020-00224-2.
- Western, Mark; Tomaszewski, Wojtek (2016). "Subjective Wellbeing, Objective Wellbeing and Inequality in Australia". PLOS ONE. 11 (10). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0163345.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link) - Proctor, Carmel (2023). "Subjective Well-Being (SWB)". In Maggino, Filomena (ed.). Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Springer. ISBN 978-3-031-17298-4.
- Boelhouwer, Jeroen; Noll, Heinz-Herbert (2023). "Objective Quality of Life". In Maggino, Filomena (ed.). Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Springer. ISBN 978-3-031-17298-4.