User:Phlsph7/Ethics - Related fields
Related fields
[edit]Value theory
[edit]Value theory, also referred to as axiology,[a] is the philosophical study of value. It aims to understand what value is and what types of value there are. Further questions include what kinds of things have value and how valuable they are.[2] A central distinction is between intrinsic and instrumental value. An entity has intrinsic value if it is good in itself or good for its own sake. An entity has instrumental value if it is valuable as a means to something else, for example, by causing something that has intrinsic value.[3] Another key topic is about what entities have intrinsic value, for example, whether pleasure has intrinsic value and whether there are other sources of intrinsic value besides pleasure.[4]
There are disagreements about the exact relation between value theory and ethics. Some philosophers characterize value theory as a subdiscipline of ethics while others see value theory as the broader term that encompasses other fields besides ethics, such as aesthetics and political philosophy.[5] A different characterization sees the two disciplines as overlapping but distinct fields.[6] The two disciplines are sometimes distinguished based on their focus: ethics is about moral behavior or what is right while value theory is about value or what is good.[7] Some ethical theories, like consequentialism, stand very close to value theory by defining what is right in terms of what is good. But this is not true for ethics in general and deontological theories tend to reject the idea that what is good can be used to define what is right.[8]
Moral psychology
[edit]Moral psychology explores the psychological foundations and processes involved in moral behavior. It is an empirical science that studies how humans think and act in moral contexts. It is interested in how moral reasoning and judgments take place, how moral character forms, what sensitivity people have to moral evaluations, and how people attribute and react to moral responsibility.[9]
One of its key topics is moral development or the question of how morality develops on a psychological level from infancy to adulthood.[10] According to Lawrence Kohlberg, for example, children go through different stages of moral development as they understand moral principles first as fixed rules governing reward and punishment, then as conventional social norms, and later as abstract principles of what is objectively right across societies.[11] A closely related question is whether and how people can be taught to act morally.[12]
Evolutionary ethics is a subfield of moral psychology and sociobiology. It explores how evolutionary processes have shaped ethics. One of its key ideas is that natural selection is responsible for moral behavior and moral sensitivity. It interprets morality as an adaptation to evolutionary pressure that augments fitness by offering a selective advantage.[13] Altruism, for example, can provide benefits to group survival by improving cooperation.[14]
Descriptive ethics
[edit]Descriptive ethics, also called comparative ethics,[15] studies actually existing moral codes, practices, and beliefs. It investigates and compares moral phenomena in different societies and different groups within a society. It aims to provide a value-neutral and empirical description without judging or justifying which practices are objectively right. For instance, the question of how nurses think about the ethical implications of abortion belongs to descriptive ethics. Another example is descriptive business ethics, which describes ethical standards in the context of business, including common practices, official policies, and employee opinions. Descriptive ethics also has a historical dimension by exploring how moral practices and beliefs have changed over time.[16]
Descriptive ethics is a multidisciplinary field that is covered by disciplines such as anthropology, sociology, psychology, and history. Its empirical outlook contrasts with the philosophical inquiry into normative questions, such as which ethical principles are correct and how to justify them.[17]
References
[edit]- Monzon, Jorge E. (29 February 2012). "Bioethics". In Abu-Faraj, Ziad O. (ed.). Handbook of Research on Biomedical Engineering Education and Advanced Bioengineering Learning: Interdisciplinary Concepts: Interdisciplinary Concepts. IGI Global. ISBN 978-1-4666-0123-9.
- Funk, Michael (4 January 2021). "What is Robot Ethics? ... and Can It be Standardized?". In Nørskov, M.; Seibt, J.; Quick, O. S. (eds.). Culturally Sustainable Social Robotics: Proceedings of Robophilosophy 2020. IOS Press. ISBN 978-1-64368-155-9.
- Smith, Barry; Thomas, Alan. "Axiology". Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved 3 January 2024.
- Schroeder, Mark (2021). "Value Theory". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Retrieved 3 January 2024.
- Cowan, Steven B. (6 February 2020). "Introduction to Part One". In Cowan, Steven B. (ed.). Problems in Value Theory: An Introduction to Contemporary Debates. Bloomsbury Publishing. ISBN 978-1-350-14741-6.
- Hirose, Iwao; Olson, Jonas (1 April 2015). "Introduction to Value Theory". In Hirose, Iwao; Olson, Jonas (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Value Theory. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-022143-0.
- Stecker, Robert (21 June 2010). "Ethics and Aesthetics". In Skorupski, John (ed.). The Routledge Companion to Ethics. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-136-96421-3.
- Calida, Behnido Y. (18 April 2022). "System Governance". In Keating, Charles B.; Katina, Polinpapilinho F.; Jr, Charles W. Chesterman; Pyne, James C. (eds.). Complex System Governance: Theory and Practice. Springer Nature. ISBN 978-3-030-93852-9.
- Grenz, Stanley J.; Guretzki, David; Nordling, Cherith Fee (17 March 2010). Pocket Dictionary of Theological Terms. InterVarsity Press. ISBN 978-0-8308-6707-3.
- Zimmerman, Michael J.; Bradley, Ben (2019). "Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic Value". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Retrieved 3 January 2024.
- Doris, John; Stich, Stephen; Phillips, Jonathan; Walmsley, Lachlan (2020). "Moral Psychology: Empirical Approaches". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Retrieved 3 January 2024.
- Thoma, Stephen J. (15 May 2015). "13 A Neo-Kohlbergian tale of Two Sensitivities". In Mower, Deborah; Robison, Wade L.; Vandenberg, Phyllis (eds.). Developing Moral Sensitivity. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-317-49841-4.
- Rudy-Hiller, Fernando (2022). "27. The Moral Psychology of Moral Responsibility". In Vargas, Manuel; Doris, John (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Moral Psychology. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-887171-2.
- Puka, William. "Moral Development". Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved 3 January 2024.
- Linn, Ruth (1994). "Moral Disobedience during the Lebanon War: What Can the Cognitive-Developmental Approach Learn from the Experience of Israeli Soldiers?". In Puka, Bill (ed.). Moral Development: New research in moral development. Taylor & Francis. ISBN 978-0-8153-1552-0.
- Eysenck, Michael W. (2004). Psychology: An International Perspective. Taylor & Francis. ISBN 978-1-84169-361-3.
- Meyer, Kirsten (9 February 2023). "Moral Education Through the Fostering of Reasoning Skills". Ethical Theory and Moral Practice. doi:10.1007/s10677-023-10367-3.
- Matsuba, M. Kyle; Murzyn, Theresa; Hart, Daniel (2011). "A model of moral identity". Advances in Child Development and Behavior. 40. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-386491-8.00005-0.
- Schroeder, Doris. "Evolutionary Ethics". Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved 4 January 2024.
- Mesoudi, Alex; Danielson, Peter (August 2008). "Ethics, evolution and culture". Theory in Biosciences. 127 (3). doi:10.1007/s12064-008-0027-y.
- Rice, Stanley A. (2009). Encyclopedia of Evolution. Infobase Publishing. ISBN 978-1-4381-1005-9.
- Post, Stephen G. (28 November 2011). "Sorokin and the Therapeutic of Love: A Critical Assessment". In Aviñó, Elvira del Pozo (ed.). Integralism, Altruism and Reconstruction: Essays in honor of Pitirim A. Sorokin. Universitat de València. ISBN 978-84-370-8362-9.
- ^
- Schroeder 2021, Lead Section
- Hirose & Olson 2015, pp. 1–2
- Grenz, Guretzki & Nordling 2010, p. 18
- ^
- Smith & Thomas, Lead Section
- Schroeder 2021, Lead Section
- Hirose & Olson 2015, pp. 1–2
- ^
- Schroeder 2021, § 2.1 Intrinsic Value
- Zimmerman & Bradley 2019, Lead Section
- ^
- Schroeder 2021, § 2.2 Monism/Pluralism
- Zimmerman & Bradley 2019, § 1. What Has Intrinsic Value?
- ^
- Schroeder 2021, Lead Section
- Cowan 2020, pp. 17–18
- Stecker 2010, pp. 525–526
- ^ Hirose & Olson 2015, pp. 1–2
- ^
- ^
- Crisp 2005, pp. 200–201
- Alexander & Moore 2021, § 1. Deontology’s Foil: Consequentialism
- Schroeder 2021, § 3. Relation to the Deontic
- ^
- Doris et al. 2020, Lead Section, § Introduction: What is Moral Psychology?
- Thoma 2015, pp. 230–231
- Rudy-Hiller 2022, p. 509
- ^ Puka, Lead Section, § 1. What it is
- ^
- Linn 1994, p. 330
- Eysenck 2004, pp. 586–588
- ^
- Meyer 2023, Abstract, Lead Section
- Matsuba, Murzyn & Hart 2011, pp. 181–182
- ^
- Schroeder, Lead Section
- Mesoudi & Danielson 2008, pp. 229–230
- Rice 2009, p. 153
- ^
- ^ Monzon 2012, p. 208
- ^
- Sims 2017, p. 6
- Barsh & Lisewski 2013, p. 29
- Sulmasy & Sugarman 2010, p. 11
- Pera & Tonder 2005, p. 7
- Kagan 1998, pp. 7–10
- ^
- Sulmasy & Sugarman 2010, p. 11
- Pera & Tonder 2005, p. 7
- Funk 2021, p. 175
Cite error: There are <ref group=lower-alpha>
tags or {{efn}}
templates on this page, but the references will not show without a {{reflist|group=lower-alpha}}
template or {{notelist}}
template (see the help page).