User:Lforensics13/Forensic linguistics
 | This is the sandbox page where you will draft your initial Wikipedia contribution.
If you're starting a new article, you can develop it here until it's ready to go live. If you're working on improvements to an existing article, copy only one section at a time of the article to this sandbox to work on, and be sure to use an edit summary linking to the article you copied from. Do not copy over the entire article. You can find additional instructions here. Remember to save your work regularly using the "Publish page" button. (It just means 'save'; it will still be in the sandbox.) You can add bold formatting to your additions to differentiate them from existing content. |
Forensic Text Types
[edit]Ransom demands or other threat communication
[edit]Bomb threats are another form of threat communication. It is the Forensic Linguists job to determine the validity of the statement and if the note has been tampered with. Linguists often work with other interrelated fields such as cyber analysts if the threat is made through text or an internet forum to test for validity or alterations.[1]
Use of linguistic evidence in legal proceedings
[edit]Ethics
[edit]There are three ethical rules that linguists are to follow when taking part in court proceedings. [2]
- The first rule is being a qualified expert witness. Strong academic credentials make it easier for the court and the jury to allow linguists to testify. When taking on cases Forensic Linguists are careful as it may be dangerous to pursue a case that the linguist cannot provide full expertise. [2]
- The second rule is to testify with truth. It is not the linguists job to prove innocence or guilt, that lies with the judge and jury. However, it is the linguist duty to provide linguistic truth. Their primary job is to help the judge and jury understand the evidence provided in a scientific way. [2]
- The third rule is to maintain composure throughout the examination. The linguist should be prepared for cross-examination. It is important for them to maintain neutrality and only provide scientific facts based off their expert knowledge. [2]
References
[edit]- ^ Alduais, Ahmed; Al-Khulaidi, Mohammed Ali; Allegretta, Silvia; Abdulkhalek, Mona Mohammed (2023-05-23). "Forensic linguistics: A scientometric review". Cogent Arts & Humanities. 10 (1). doi:10.1080/23311983.2023.2214387. ISSN 2331-1983.
- ^ a b c d Butters, Ronald R. (2011-05-13). "Forensic Linguistics". Journal of English Linguistics. 39 (2): 196–202. doi:10.1177/0022022111403849. ISSN 0075-4242.