User:Ktack/sandbox
Article Evaluation
[edit]Article Evaluation 1: Nativism (politics)
Before reading this article I did not realize that a common Republican policy had its own name and place away from typical political parties such as the Democrats and Republicans. The first paragraph is a great opener, telling us exactly what Nativism is.
After explaining the definition of nativism the article goes on to exemplify the political stance by country, which I think was done very well. Separating each country into its own section prevents confusion for the reader who might miss the topic change from, for example, the U.S. to Canada.
Next, the article explains Nativism throughout history. Organizing time periods chronologically was the best approach, just like how countries were alphabetically ordered.
As far as I can tell, because there are far too many to check each and every one, all external and internal links appear to be working just fine, and a sufficient amount of information is linked and cited.
The article itself is incredibly informative and non-biased.
Looking at the talk page I can tell that this article has undergone a great deal of work, and most, if not all, contributions are well thought out and helpful. ~~~~
Report Card
[edit]As a former Representative of Kansas, Pompeo has an extensive report card covering his 6 years in Congress. Even after his appointment as Director of the Central Intelligence Agency, followed by his current job as United States Secretary of State, he continues to receive ratings from interest groups, although not as many interests groups focus on him following his vacancy.
Each interest group has their own way of calculating ratings for each Member of Congress. For example, the National Rifle Association rates members on a scale of A to F based on the member's gun-related legislative history. [1] The NAACP grades members of Congress similarly, grading based on that member's voting behavior with civil rights issues concerning the NAACP. [2] Some interest groups even list criteria which legislators must meet in order to score better. The National Education Association lists their criteria as follows:[3]
- Cosponsorship of bills critical to advancing NEA’s identified legislative priorities;
- Behind- the-scenes work to advance or impede NEA priority issues;
- Committee votes in support of or against NEA priorities;
- Accessibility of the Member and staff in Washington, DC to NEA staff and leaders; and
- Accessibility and education advocacy in the Member’s home state or district.
Most interest groups detail their rating process on their website.
Interest groups create these report cards members of Congress in order to hold them accountable for their legislation, good or bad.
Conservative interest groups, such as Campaign for Working Families and National Right to Life Committee, give Pompeo such high ratings due to their corresponding party affiliations. On the other end of the spectrum, NARAL Pro-Choice America consistently gives him painfully low ratings due to their clashing ideals.
Below is a list of Mike Pompeo's ratings from various Interest groups. The tables are organized by year, and from highest to lowest rating. [4]
2018
[edit]| Interest Group | Rating |
|---|---|
| Americans for Prosperity | 99% |
| Heritage Action | 0% |
2017
[edit]| Interest Group | Rating |
|---|---|
| American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations | 8% |
| Results (organisation) | 5% |
| League of Conservation Voters | 4% |
| Environment America | 0% |
2016
[edit]| Interest Group | Rating |
|---|---|
| Campaign for Working Families | 100% |
| National Right to Life Committee | 100% |
| American Forest & Paper Association | 100% |
| American Builders and Contractors | 100% |
| United States Chamber of Commerce | 100% |
| National Federation of Independent Business | 100% |
| United States Senate Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship | 100% |
| National Ready Mixed Concrete Association | 92% |
| National Association of Manufacturers | 91% |
| American Bakers Association | 85% |
| United States Chamber of Commerce (cumulative) | 82% |
| Associated General Contractors of America | 70% |
| International Warehouse Logistics Association | 62% |
| Food Policy Action | 25% |
| Humane Society Legislative Fund | 15% |
| American Civil Liberties Union | 5% |
| NARAL Pro-Choice America | 0% |
| Planned Parenthood Action Fund | 0% |
| Population Connection | 0% |
| National Farmers Union (United States) | 0% |
| Defenders of Wildlife | 0% |
| Animal Welfare Institute | 0% |
| Common Cause | 0% |
| EarthRights International | 0% |
2015
[edit]2014
[edit]2013
[edit]| Interest Group | Rating |
|---|---|
| National Right to Life Committee | 100% |
| National Federation of Independent Business | 100% |
| The National Lumber and Building Material Dealers Association | 100% |
| American Conservative Union | 100% |
| Concerned Women for America | 100% |
| Eagle Forum | 100% |
| Competitive Enterprise Institute | 100% |
| American Veterans Committee | 90% |
| United States Chamber of Commerce | 85% |
| National Journal (Conservative) | 84% |
| Metals Service Center Institute | 83% |
| John Birch Society | 70% |
| National Electrical Contractors Association | 38% |
| Friends Committee on National Legislation | 36% |
| Defenders of Wildlife | 33% |
| Republican Liberty Caucus | 30% |
| Humane Society Legislative Fund | 25% |
| American Library Association | 22% |
| NAACP | 21% |
| Venn Institute | 17% |
| Sargent Shriver National Center on Poverty Law | 11% |
| Federally Employed Women | 10% |
| Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights | 8% |
| Food Policy Action | 8% |
| Alliance for Retired Americans | 0% |
| Peace Action West | 0% |
| EarthRights International | 0% |
| Population Connection | 0% |
| NARAL Pro-Choice America | 0% |
2012
[edit]2011
[edit] | This is a user sandbox of Ktack. You can use it for testing or practicing edits. This is not the place where you work on your assigned article for a dashboard.wikiedu.org course. Visit your Dashboard course page and follow the links for your assigned article in the My Articles section. |
- ^ "How the National Rifle Association Rates Lawmakers". Retrieved 2018-10-26.
- ^ "NAACP | Civil Rights Legislative Report Cards". NAACP. Retrieved 2018-10-26.
- ^ "Legislative Report Card". edadvocacy.nea.org. Retrieved 2018-10-27.
- ^ "The Voter's Self Defense System". Vote Smart. Retrieved 2018-10-03.