User:Jimmyhoban11/Choose an Article
Article Selection
[edit]Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.
Option 1
[edit]=
[edit]- Article title
- Boston Cannons
- Article Evaluation
- Good Article - lacks updated information
- Last update was 2 years ago
- tone and grammar is fine - if anything just needs new information and a slight revamp
- Sources
- https://premierlacrosseleague.com/articles/cannons-offseason-primer-building-for-a-bounce-back-in-2025#:~:text=The%20Boston%20Cannons'%202024%20season,a%20plethora%20of%20offensive%20power. ===
Option 2
[edit]=
[edit]- Article title
- Lacrosse
- Article Evaluation
- The entire history and rule page is great. The equipment portion is lacking as well as the tone being mediocre and just hard to read. Some more details on mandated rules and reasons why would be helpful, especially for people entering the sport.
- Sources
- https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27014942/ ===
Option 3
[edit]=
[edit]- Article title
- Medical Anthropology
- Article Evaluation
- Citations are a mess. Grammar issues in places as well as the general content of the article being mediocre in places. I would argue for the inclusion of a section on how other sciences interact with it as it is the culmination of many sciences.
- Sources
- https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25055321/ ===
Option 4
[edit]=
[edit]- Article title
- Sports
- Article Evaluation
- The content of the article lacks citations. The content is mediocre in places and there are slight grammatical errors. Needs a revamp and more content in sportsmanship, cheating, and other minor categories. I would also argue for the addition of a common roles in sports section.
- Sources
- https://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-012722-045214 ===
Option 5
[edit]=
[edit]- Article title
- Sports betting
- Article Evaluation
- There is generally a lack of content on the topic with very little citations as well as specifics. There are sections that could be combined and some that could just be eliminated overall or expanded. The overall flow of the article is good but it just needs more content.
- Sources
- https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10066997/ ===