User:Isabelalvarado0/Ajami script
Appearance
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.
- Name of article: Ajami Script
- Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate. This article was assigned to me.
Lead
[edit]Guiding questions:
- Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes.
- Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? No.
- Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?No.
- Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? It is concise.
Lead evaluation
[edit]Content
[edit]Guiding questions:
- Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Yes, because Ajami script is used in Africans languages especially Swahili and Hausa which in class we discussed about types of writings such as Arabic.
- Is the content up-to-date? Yes.
- Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? No there is no content that is missing, the article is concise.
Content evaluation
[edit]Tone and Balance
[edit]Guiding questions:
- Is the article neutral? Yes
- Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No, the article is more informative. There is no bias in the article.
- Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No.
- Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No.
Tone and balance evaluation
[edit]Sources and References
[edit]Guiding questions:
- Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? No not all facts are backed up by a reliable source. There could have been better sources.
- Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes.
- Are the sources current? Some are current but the others are older.
- Check a few links. Do they work? Only some
Sources and references evaluation
[edit]Organization
[edit]Guiding questions:
- Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes, the article is well written and clear.
- Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? No.
- Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes the article is well organized.
- Organization evaluation
Images and Media
[edit]Guiding questions:
- Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? Yes it includes the whole alphabet of Ajami Script
- Are images well-captioned? Yes
- Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? Yes.
- Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? Yes.
Images and media evaluation
[edit]Checking the talk page
[edit]Guiding questions:
- What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? The types of conversations in the talk page is someone asking a question, mentioning broken link and someone adding information.
- How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? The article is rated as a C
- How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? Wikipedia discusses this topic different from the way we’ve talked about it in class by going into more detail and background.
Talk page evaluation
[edit]Overall impressions
[edit]Guiding questions:
- What is the article's overall status? The article is very informative and helpful in learning about Ajami script.
- What are the article's strengths? Explaining the backgroun behind Ajami Script.
- How can the article be improved? The article can be improved by adding more sources and also more images.
- How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? The article is well developed.
Overall evaluation
[edit]Optional activity
[edit]- Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback with four tildes ~~~~
- Link to feedback: