User:Intangible2.0/Archive1
Your change to the page Talk:New-Flemish Alliance was determined to be unhelpful and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. --83.182.216.224 22:06, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Which user name
[edit]Since the name is so obvious, perhaps you have abandoned or lost the password to User:Intangible and want to use this account instead? If so post here and I will unblock. Thatcher131 09:15, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
- I did try to abandon, but forgot this discussion at New-Flemish Alliance. Somehow saying "I know several members who are neo-Nazis" at an article's talk page without any third party reference isn't slander?
- Anyhow, the checkuser for Intangible and Intangible2.0 will show the same ip address. The only one who should have been blocked here is User:83.182.207.220 for posting slanderous comments under the dubious qualification "freedom of speech" (Wikipedia is ran on private servers by the Wikipedia Foundation). If nothing is done about this, it looks to me the Wikipedia project has more troubles than I already thought it had. Intangible2.0 13:19, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
Unblock
[edit]You are using this template in the wrong namespace. Use this template on your talk page instead.
Will you confirm that you will no longer be using User:Intangible, that this is your only account, and that you agree to the arbcom limits placed on User:Intangible? Thatcher131 13:53, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
- There are two more accounts linked to my static ip, but I have only once made an article edit two months ago with one of them, and some talk page comments a couple of days ago. Nothing abusive, although they are blocked now. I only want to have that slanderous comment removed from New-Flemish Alliance. Intangible2.0 14:07, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
- I don't see a case for a week long block for sock puppetry. As you say, the two Pinko accounts were used briefly and not on any articles that Intangible worked on. It's a minor violation at best, and there is no violation with Intangible2.0 since Intangible was not under block when you abandoned that account. Do you agree to use Intangible2.0 as your only account and that the arbcom limitations placed on Intagible apply to Intangible2.0? Thatcher131 14:25, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
:::Me being blocked for a week or so now seems to be more important than removing slanderous comments from Wikipedia itself. Being blocked for "intentions" is simply a mute point, since I am editing from a static ip. When will somone remove those slanderous comments? Intangible2.0 14:29, 9 December 2006 (UTC)Sure. I will use only this account from now. But can I at least remove those comments from New-Flemish Alliance? Or will I be blocked again when I do so? Maybe it is best then for someone else to remove them? Intangible2.0 14:31, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
- I don't see a case for a week long block for sock puppetry. As you say, the two Pinko accounts were used briefly and not on any articles that Intangible worked on. It's a minor violation at best, and there is no violation with Intangible2.0 since Intangible was not under block when you abandoned that account. Do you agree to use Intangible2.0 as your only account and that the arbcom limitations placed on Intagible apply to Intangible2.0? Thatcher131 14:25, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
- Reduced to 24 hours as described above. I will removed the comments in the mean time. Thatcher131 14:35, 9 December 2006 (UTC)