User:Inferior12/Evaluate an Article
 | Evaluate an article
Complete your article evaluation below. Here are the key aspects to consider: Lead sectionA good lead section defines the topic and provides a concise overview. A reader who just wants to identify the topic can read the first sentence. A reader who wants a very brief overview of the most important things about it can read the first paragraph. A reader who wants a quick overview can read the whole lead section.
ContentA good Wikipedia article should cover all the important aspects of a topic, without putting too much weight on one part while neglecting another.
Tone and BalanceWikipedia articles should be written from a neutral point of view; if there are substantial differences of interpretation or controversies among published, reliable sources, those views should be described as fairly as possible.
Sources and ReferencesA Wikipedia article should be based on the best sources available for the topic at hand. When possible, this means academic and peer-reviewed publications or scholarly books.
Organization and writing qualityThe writing should be clear and professional, the content should be organized sensibly into sections.
Images and Media
Talk page discussionThe article's talk page — and any discussions among other Wikipedia editors that have been taking place there — can be a useful window into the state of an article, and might help you focus on important aspects that you didn't think of.
Overall impressions
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved. |
Which article are you evaluating?
[edit](Passive learning) (Talk:Passive learning)I will be evaluation passive learning.
Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
[edit]I chose this article because I am always opened and interested in different techniques for learning and find them interesting. Learning is very important so I think it matters so much to find the best way to do it and to keep our minds opened to all the different ways of learning.
Evaluate the article
[edit]Lead section- The start of the article does a very good job of explaining what passive learning is. It helps give a better understanding of what the process is and why it could be used.
Content- The content of the article passive learning is rather good it includes Advantages and disadvantages of passive learning. Although the article is rather short the content is meaningful and helps you understand the pros and cons of the subject.
Tone and balance- This article is very neutral. It includes the advantages and the disadvantages of passive learning.
Sources and reverences.- This article is 50/50 on sources and reverences. This meaning is provides sources or reverences only some of the times if that. This article definitely needs some more information from sources to back it up. On the plus side the sources they did provided all work.
Organization and writing quality- Looking through the article there is no apparent spelling or grammar errors. I do like how the article is organized and how the information is broken down into different categories.
Images and media- The article has very poor images. There is not many images to help understand and the images provided don't help me understand the topic.
Talk page discussion- There is not much conversation going on in the talk category I would like to see more.
Overall impression- The article all in all is very well put together. It helps readers understand passive learning and gives the pros and cons for both sides. The article could definitely use some improvements though things such as better images and more sources, reverences would tie this article together and make is great. I believe the article is well developed.