Jump to content

User:HexaRose/Choose an Article

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Article Selection

[edit]

Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

[edit]
Article title
CMP kinase
Article Evaluation
  • Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
  • Yes it is relevant.
  • Is it written neutrally?
  • Yes.
  • Does each claim have a citation?
  • Yes.
  • Are the citations reliable?
  • Yes
  • Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)?
  • No
Sources

Option 2

[edit]
Article title
Artemin
Article Evaluation
  • Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
  • Yes it is relevant.
  • Is it written neutrally?
  • Yes.
  • Does each claim have a citation?
  • No.
  • Are the citations reliable?
  • Yes
  • Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)?
  • No
Sources

Option 3

[edit]
Article title
ERMAP
Article Evaluation
  • Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
  • Yes it is relevant.
  • Is it written neutrally?
  • Yes.
  • Does each claim have a citation?
  • No.
  • Are the citations reliable?
  • Yes
  • Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)?
  • No
Sources

Option 4

[edit]
Article title
CD5L
Article Evaluation
  • Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
  • Yes it is relevant.
  • Is it written neutrally?
  • Yes.
  • Does each claim have a citation?
  • No.
  • Are the citations reliable?
  • Yes
  • Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)?
  • No
Sources

Option 5

[edit]
Article title
EPHA10
Article Evaluation
  • Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
  • Yes it is relevant.
  • Is it written neutrally?
  • Yes.
  • Does each claim have a citation?
  • No.
  • Are the citations reliable?
  • Yes
  • Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)?
  • No
Sources