Jump to content

User:Harold Foppele/sandbox-5

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Quantum Mechanics

[edit]

Quantum mechanics is a fundamental theory in physics that describes the behavior of matter and energy at the smallest scales, such as atoms and subatomic particles. It forms the basis of quantum physics, which studies phenomena that classical physics cannot explain, including wave-particle duality, quantization of energy, and quantum entanglement. This article provides a scientific overview of quantum mechanics, its history, key concepts, equations, applications, interpretations, and a concise reference guide.

Overview

[edit]

Quantum mechanics is the mathematical framework within quantum physics that provides rules and equations to describe and predict the behavior of quantum systems. A quantum (plural: quanta) is the smallest discrete unit of a physical property, such as energy or light (e.g., a photon is a quantum of light). Quantum physics explores the behavior of matter and energy at atomic and subatomic scales, where classical mechanics fails to account for observed phenomena. Quantum mechanics underpins modern technologies such as semiconductors, lasers, and solar cells, and is driving emerging fields like quantum computing and quantum sensing.[1] Despite its success, its principles often challenge intuitive human experience, making it one of the most conceptually intriguing theories in science.[2]

Historical Background

[edit]

Early Challenges to Classical Physics In the 19th century, classical physics successfully described motion, gravity, and electromagnetism. Thomas Young’s 1801 double-slit experiment supported the wave theory of light.[3] However, by the late 19th century, anomalies emerged that classical physics could not explain. In 1900, Max Planck proposed that light is emitted in discrete packets, or quanta, to explain the blackbody radiation spectrum.[4] In 1905, Albert Einstein extended this idea to explain the photoelectric effect, introducing the concept of the photon.[5] Niels Bohr’s 1913 atomic model described electron behavior in hydrogen atoms, though it was limited for larger systems.[6] In 1927, Clinton Davisson and Lester Germer demonstrated electron diffraction, confirming wave-particle duality.[7]

Development of Quantum Mechanics

[edit]

In 1925–1926, Werner Heisenberg and Erwin Schrödinger independently developed the mathematical foundations of quantum mechanics. Heisenberg’s matrix mechanics and Schrödinger’s wave mechanics provided equivalent frameworks for describing quantum systems.[8][9] These formulations introduced key concepts such as the wavefunction and the uncertainty principle, laying the groundwork for modern quantum theory. Size and Quantum Effects Quantum mechanics primarily governs phenomena at scales of nanometers (10⁻⁹ meters) or smaller, where effects like wave-particle duality, superposition, and energy quantization dominate. For example, in atoms, electron orbitals have discrete energy levels determined by their size. In atoms, electron orbitals have discrete (quantized) energy levels, which are determined by the principal quantum number , often associated with the "size" of the orbital. Larger orbitals (higher ) correspond to higher energy levels. This is a fundamental principle of quantum mechanics, where electrons occupy specific energy states, and transitions between these levels involve absorbing or emitting discrete amounts of energy.As system size increases to macroscopic scales, quantum effects diminish due to decoherence, and classical mechanics becomes applicable.[10][11] Bohr’s 1913 paper introduced the concept of quantized energy levels for electrons in atoms, discrete energy levels and transitions. It does not cover decoherence or the transition to classical mechanics. Griffiths’ textbook is a standard reference for quantum mechanics. It covers the quantized energy levels of electron orbitals (Chapter 4, "The Hydrogen Atom") and explains how quantum effects like discrete energy states arise from the principal quantum number . It also discusses decoherence and the classical limit in later sections (e.g., Chapter 9).

In specific contexts

[edit]

Quantum Confinement: In nanostructures like quantum dots, physical size restricts electron movement, leading to quantized energy levels.[12]
Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle: Smaller spatial confinement increases momentum uncertainty a hallmark of quantum behavior. A difficulty is finding the proper analogue for the uncertainty principle, an idea frequently attributed to Heisenberg, who introduced the concept in analyzing a thought experiment involving an electron and a high-energy photon. However, Heisenberg did not give precise mathematical definitions of what the "uncertainty" in these measurements meant. The precise mathematical statement of the position–momentum uncertainty principle is due to Kennard, Pauli, and Weyl.[13][14]
Macroscopic Quantum Phenomena: In rare cases, such as superconductors or Bose-Einstein condensates, quantum effects persist at larger scales under specific conditions, such as low temperatures.[15]

Key Equations

[edit]

Schrödinger Equation The Schrödinger equation, formulated by Erwin Schrödinger in 1925–1926, describes the time evolution of a quantum system’s wavefunction (ψ). It is expressed as: where is the reduced Planck constant, is the Hamiltonian operator (representing total energy), and is the wavefunction. The equation enables predictions of atomic and molecular structures and is foundational to semiconductor physics.[16][17][18]
Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle The Heisenberg uncertainty principle states that certain pairs of properties, such as position x and momentum p, cannot be measured simultaneously with arbitrary precision: This principle highlights the probabilistic nature of quantum systems.[19][20]
Dirac Equation The Dirac equation, formulated in 1928, combines quantum mechanics with special relativity to describe particles like electrons. It predicted the existence of antimatter and reduces to the Schrödinger equation in the non-relativistic limit.[21][22][23]

Klein–Gordon equation The Klein–Gordon equation is a relativistic wave equation that preceded the Dirac equation. While it incorporates special relativity, its probability density interpretation posed challenges, making it less widely used for non-relativistic systems.[24][25]

Core Concepts

[edit]

Wavefunction The wavefunction \psi describes the quantum state of a system. Its squared magnitude |\psi|^2 gives the probability density of finding a particle in a specific region.[26][27]

Superposition Superposition allows quantum systems to exist in multiple states simultaneously until measured. Schrödinger’s 1935 thought experiment, “Schrödinger’s cat,” illustrates this concept, highlighting the counterintuitive nature of quantum mechanics.<[28][29][30]

Entanglement Quantum entanglement is a phenomenon in quantum mechanics where two or more particles become linked in such a way that their quantum states are interconnected, no matter how far apart they are in space. Here’s a clear breakdown of the concept: Key Points of Quantum Entanglement:

  • Correlated States:
    - When particles are entangled, their properties (like spin, polarization, or momentum) are not independent. Instead, they are described by a single, shared quantum state.
    - If two particles are entangled, their states are correlated, meaning the outcome of measuring one particle’s property (e.g., spin) is tied to the outcome of measuring the other particle’s property.[31]
  • Measurement and Instantaneous Influence:
    - When measured the state of one entangled particle (e.g., checking its spin), the result immediately determines the state of the other particle, even if they are light-years apart.
    - This "influence" happens faster than the speed of light, which puzzled scientists like Einstein, who called it "spooky action at a distance."[32]
  • No Classical Explanation:
    - Unlike classical systems, where objects have definite states, quantum particles exist in a superposition (a mix of all possible states) until measured. Entanglement means the particles’ superpositions are linked, so measuring one collapses the shared quantum state, instantly fixing the state of the other.[33]
  • Key Example:
    - Two entangled electrons, each with a spin that can be "up" or "down." If you measure one electron and find its spin is "up," the other electron’s spin will instantly be "down," no matter how far apart they are. Before measurement, neither electron has a definite spin—they exist in a combined superposition of all possibilities.[34]
  • No Communication:
    - Importantly, entanglement doesn’t allow faster-than-light communication. The measurement outcomes are random, and you can’t control the result of one particle’s measurement to send a specific message to the other.[35]
  • Distance Doesn’t Matter:
    - The correlation between entangled particles holds regardless of the distance separating them. Experiments have confirmed entanglement over distances of hundreds of kilometers, and theoretically, it works across any distance.[36]

Why Is This Weird?

  • In classical physics, objects have definite properties, and any influence between them is limited by the speed of light. Entanglement defies this intuition because the correlation appears instantaneous, challenging our understanding of causality and locality.[37]
  • Einstein and others initially thought quantum mechanics might be incomplete because of this, leading to debates about "hidden variables" (unseen factors that might explain the correlation). However, experiments like those testing Bell’s inequalities have confirmed that entanglement is real and not due to hidden variables.[38]

Real-World Implications:

  • Quantum Computing: Entanglement is a key resource for quantum computers, enabling faster processing and secure information transfer.[39]
  • Quantum Cryptography: Entanglement is used in protocols like quantum key distribution (e.g., BB84) to create secure communication channels.[40]
  • Fundamental Physics: Entanglement helps scientists probe the foundations of quantum mechanics and test theories about the nature of reality.[41]
  • Simple Analogy:Two entangled particles act as a pair of magic dice. When you roll one dice and get a number, the other dice, no matter where it is in the universe, instantly shows a number that’s perfectly correlated (e.g., if one is 6, the other is always 1). Before rolling, neither dice has a set number—they’re in an undefined state—but the moment you check one, the other’s result is locked in, instantly.[42]

Experimental Evidence:

  • Bell Tests: Experiments, starting with John Bell’s work in the 1960s and continued in labs worldwide, have confirmed entanglement by showing that particle correlations violate classical expectations.[43]
  • Recent Advances: In 2022, the Nobel Prize in Physics was awarded to Aspect, Clauser, and Zeilinger for their groundbreaking work on entanglement, including experiments that closed loopholes in earlier tests.[44]

In short, quantum entanglement is a fascinating and experimentally verified phenomenon where particles share a special connection, allowing measurements on one to instantly affect the other, regardless of distance. It’s a cornerstone of quantum mechanics with profound implications for technology and our understanding of the universe. Quantum entanglement occurs when particles share correlated quantum states, such that measuring one instantly affects the other, regardless of distance. This phenomenon, described by Einstein as “spooky action at a distance,” was confirmed experimentally and is central to quantum cryptography.[45][46][47] Measurement and Uncertainty Measurement in quantum mechanics alters the system, leading to probabilistic outcomes. The Heisenberg uncertainty principle formalizes the limits of simultaneous measurement of properties like position and momentum.[48]

Applications

[edit]

Quantum mechanics has enabled transformative technologies and is driving a “second quantum revolution” through superposition and entanglement. Key applications include:
Quantum Computing: Utilizes qubits, which leverage superposition and entanglement for parallel processing, enabling solutions to complex problems like molecular simulations and cryptography.Cite error: A <ref> tag is missing the closing </ref> (see the help page).
Quantum Communication: Uses entanglement for secure communication, such as quantum cryptography.[49]
Quantum logic clock: Quantum-based timekeeping devices offer unprecedented precision, with contributions from institutions like the University of Adelaide.[50]

Australian institutions, including the University of Sydney, University of Queensland, and University of Adelaide, are significant contributors to global quantum research.[51] Interpretations Quantum mechanics is experimentally robust but its interpretation remains debated. Some physicists view the wavefunction as a physical entity, while others see it as a mathematical tool for predicting outcomes.
Interpretations include the Copenhagen interpretation, many-worlds interpretation, and hidden-variable theories.[52]

Quantum Mechanics Reference Guide

[edit]

Quantum: The smallest unit of a physical property, e.g., a photon (quantum of light). Quantum Physics: The study of matter and energy at atomic and subatomic scales. Quantum Mechanics: The mathematical framework for describing quantum behavior, including wavefunctions, superposition, and the uncertainty principle. Key Phenomena: Wave-Particle Duality: Particles exhibit both wave-like and particle-like properties. Superposition: Systems exist in multiple states until measured. Entanglement: Correlated particles affect each other instantly, regardless of distance.

Applications

[edit]

Electronics: Transistors and semiconductors rely on quantum tunneling and energy quantization.
Lasers: Operate using controlled photon emission.
Medical Imaging: MRI scanners exploit quantum properties of particle spins.
Quantum Computing: Uses qubits for advanced computation in fields like drug discovery and cryptography.


See Also

History of quantum mechanics Wave-particle duality Schrödinger equation Quantum entanglement Quantum computing

References

  1. ^ Griffiths, David J. (2018). Introduction to Quantum Mechanics (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1107189638.Dowling, Jonathan P.; Milburn, Gerard J. (2003). "Quantum technology: the second quantum revolution". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A. 361 (1809): 1655–1674. Bibcode:2003RSPTA.361.1655D. doi:10.1098/rsta.2003.1227. PMID 12952679.
  2. ^ Jammer, Max (1966). The Conceptual Development of Quantum Mechanics. New York: McGraw-Hill. ISBN 978-0070324336.
  3. ^ Young, Thomas (1802). "The Bakerian Lecture: Experiments and Calculations Relative to Physical Optics". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. 92: 12–48. doi:10.1098/rstl.1802.0003.
  4. ^ Planck, Max (1901). "On the Law of Distribution of Energy in the Normal Spectrum". Annalen der Physik. 4: 553–563. doi:10.1002/andp.19013090310.
  5. ^ Einstein, Albert (1905). "On a Heuristic Viewpoint Concerning the Production and Transformation of Light". Annalen der Physik. 17: 132–148. doi:10.1002/andp.19053220607.
  6. ^ Bohr, Niels (1922). The Theory of Spectra and Atomic Constitution. Cambridge University Press.
  7. ^ Davisson, Clinton J.; Germer, Lester H. (1927). "Diffraction of Electrons by a Crystal of Nickel". Physical Review. 30 (6): 705–740. Bibcode:1927PhRv...30..705D. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.30.705.
  8. ^ Heisenberg, Werner (1927). "Über den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischen Kinematik und Mechanik". Zeitschrift für Physik. 43 (3–4): 172–198. Bibcode:1927ZPhy...43..172H. doi:10.1007/BF01397280.
  9. ^ Schrödinger, Erwin (1926). "Quantisation as an Eigenvalue Problem". Annalen der Physik. 384 (4): 361–376. doi:10.1002/andp.19263840404.
  10. ^ Bohr, Niels (1913). "On the Constitution of Atoms and Molecules, Part I". Philosophical Magazine. 26 (151): 1–25. doi:10.1080/14786441308634955
  11. ^ Griffiths, David J. (2005). Introduction to Quantum Mechanics (2nd ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall. ISBN: 978-0131118928
  12. ^ Harrison, Paul (2016). Quantum Wells, Wires and Dots. Wiley. ISBN 978-1118923368.
  13. ^ Busch, Paul; Lahti, Pekka; Werner, Reinhard F. (17 October 2013). "Proof of Heisenberg's Error-Disturbance Relation" (PDF). Physical Review Letters. 111 (16) 160405. arXiv:1306.1565. Bibcode:2013PhRvL.111p0405B. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.160405. ISSN 0031-9007. PMID 24182239. S2CID 24507489.
  14. ^ Appleby, David Marcus (6 May 2016). "Quantum Errors and Disturbances: Response to Busch, Lahti and Werner". Entropy. 18 (5): 174. arXiv:1602.09002. Bibcode:2016Entrp..18..174A. doi:10.3390/e18050174.
  15. ^ Annett, James F. (2004). Superconductivity, Superfluids, and Condensates. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0198507567.
  16. ^ Griffiths, David J. (2004). Introduction to Quantum Mechanics (2nd ed.). Prentice Hall. ISBN 978-0-13-111892-8.
  17. ^ Zwiebach, Barton (2022). Mastering Quantum Mechanics: Essentials, Theory, and Applications. MIT Press. ISBN 978-0-262-04613-8. OCLC 1347739457.
  18. ^ Shankar, R. (1994). Principles of Quantum Mechanics (2nd ed.). Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers. ISBN 978-0-306-44790-7.
  19. ^ Griffiths, David J.; Schroeter, Darrell F. (2018). Introduction to Quantum Mechanics (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-316-99543-3.
  20. ^ Landau, Lev Davidovich; Lifshitz, Evgeny Mikhailovich (1977). Quantum Mechanics: Non-Relativistic Theory. Vol. 3 (3rd ed.). Pergamon Press. ISBN 978-0-08-020940-1.
  21. ^ Ohlsson, Tommy (2011). Relativistic Quantum Physics: From advanced quantum mechanics to introductory quantum field theory. Cambridge University Press. p. 86. ISBN 978-1-139-50432-4.
  22. ^ Itzykson, Claude; Zuber, Jean-Bernard (1980). "2". Quantum Field Theory. McGraw-Hill.
  23. ^ Dirac, Paul A. M. (1981). The Principles of Quantum Mechanics (4th ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0198520115.
  24. ^ Greiner, Walter (2000). Relativistic Quantum Mechanics: Wave Equations. Springer. pp. 1–10. ISBN 978-3540674573.
  25. ^ Greiner, Walter (2013). Relativistic Quantum Mechanics. Springer. ISBN 978-3-662-03425-5.
  26. ^ Griffiths, David J. (2004). Introduction to Quantum Mechanics. Pearson Education. pp. 94, 162ff, 200. ISBN 0-13-111892-7.
  27. ^ Atkins, P. W. (1974). Quanta: A Handbook of Concepts. Oxford University Press. p. 258. ISBN 0-19-855493-1.
  28. ^ Messiah, Albert (1976). Quantum mechanics. Vol. 1 (2 ed.). Amsterdam: North-Holland. ISBN 978-0-471-59766-7.
  29. ^ Nielsen, Michael A.; Chuang, Isaac (2010). Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-10700-217-3. OCLC 43641333.
  30. ^ Schrödinger, Erwin (1935). "Die gegenwärtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik". Naturwissenschaften. 23 (48): 807–812. Bibcode:1935NW.....23..807S. doi:10.1007/BF01491891.
  31. ^ Horodecki, Ryszard; Horodecki, Pawel; Horodecki, Michal; Horodecki, Karol (2009). "Quantum entanglement". Reviews of Modern Physics. 81 (2): 865–942. arXiv:quant-ph/0702225. Bibcode:2009RvMP...81..865H. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.81.865. S2CID 59577352.
  32. ^ Zwiebach, Barton (2022). Mastering Quantum Mechanics: Essentials, Theory, and Applications. MIT Press. pp. §1.5, §18.6, §18.8, §22.2, §22.4. ISBN 978-0-262-04613-8.
  33. ^ Bengtsson, Ingemar; Życzkowski, Karol (2017). Geometry of Quantum States: An Introduction to Quantum Entanglement (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 435, 493–497, 471, 447, 480. ISBN 978-1-107-02625-4.
  34. ^ Rieffel, Eleanor; Polak, Wolfgang (2011). Quantum Computing: A Gentle Introduction. MIT Press. pp. 218, 39, 38–39, 62, 207–212. ISBN 978-0-262-01506-6.
  35. ^ Nielsen, Michael A.; Chuang, Isaac L. (2010). Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (10th anniversary ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 106, 113–114, 27, 98, 116, 505. ISBN 978-0-521-63503-5.
  36. ^ Friis, Nicolai; Vitagliano, Giuseppe; Malik, Mehuls; Huber, Marcus (2019). "Entanglement certification from theory to experiment". Nature Reviews Physics. 1: 72–87. arXiv:1906.10929. Bibcode:2019NatRP...1...72F. doi:10.1038/s42254-018-0003-5. S2CID 125658647.
  37. ^ Peres, Asher (1993). Quantum Theory: Concepts and Methods. Kluwer. pp. 73–74, 264, 369. ISBN 0-7923-2549-4.
  38. ^ Plenio, Martin B.; Virmani, Shashank (2007). "An introduction to entanglement measures". Quant. Inf. Comp.: 1–51. arXiv:quant-ph/0504163. Bibcode:2005quant.ph..4163P.
  39. ^ Bertlmann, Reinhold; Friis, Nicolai (2023). Modern Quantum Theory: From Quantum Mechanics to Entanglement and Quantum Information. Oxford University Press. p. 511. ISBN 978-0-19-150634-5.
  40. ^ Pirandola, S.; Andersen, U. L.; Banchi, L.; Berta, M.; Bunandar, D.; Colbeck, R.; Englund, D.; Gehring, T.; Lupo, C.; Ottaviani, C.; Pereira, J. L.; Razavi, M.; Shaari, J. Shamsul; Tomamichel, M.; Usenko, V. C.; Vallone, G.; Villoresi, P.; Wallden, P. (2020). "Advances in quantum cryptography". Adv. Opt. Photon. 12 (4): 1012–1236. arXiv:1906.01645. Bibcode:2020AdOP...12.1012P. doi:10.1364/AOP.361502. S2CID 174799187.
  41. ^ Vedral, Vlatko (2002). "The role of relative entropy in quantum information theory". Reviews of Modern Physics. 74 (1): 197–234. arXiv:quant-ph/0102094. Bibcode:2002RvMP...74..197V. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.74.197. S2CID 6370982.
  42. ^ Rau, Jochen (2021). Quantum Theory: An Information Processing Approach. Oxford University Press. pp. 131, 133. ISBN 978-0-19-289630-8.
  43. ^ Guo, Yu; Hu, Xiao-Min; Liu, Bi-Heng; Li, Chuan-Feng; Guo, Guang-Can (2023). "Progress in quantum teleportation". Nature Reviews Physics. 5 (6): 339–353. Bibcode:2023NatRP...5..339H. doi:10.1038/s42254-023-00588-x.
  44. ^ "The Nobel Prize in Physics 2022". NobelPrize.org. Retrieved 4 October 2025.
  45. ^ Bertlmann, Reinhold; Friis, Nicolai (2023). Modern Quantum Theory: From Quantum Mechanics to Entanglement and Quantum Information. Oxford University Press. p. 511. ISBN 978-0-19-150634-5.
  46. ^ Einstein, Albert; Podolsky, Boris; Rosen, Nathan (1935). "Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?". Physical Review. 47 (10): 777–780. Bibcode:1935PhRv...47..777E. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.47.777.
  47. ^ Bell, John S. (1964). "On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen Paradox". Physics Physique Физика. 1 (3): 195–200. doi:10.1103/PhysicsPhysiqueFizika.1.195.
  48. ^ Peres, Asher (1995). Quantum Theory: Concepts and Methods. Kluwer Academic Publishers. ISBN 0-7923-2549-4. OCLC 318268606.
  49. ^ Gisin, Nicolas; Ribordy, Gilles; Tittel, Wolfgang; Zbinden, Hugo (2002). "Quantum Cryptography". Reviews of Modern Physics. 74 (1): 145–195. arXiv:quant-ph/0101098. Bibcode:2002RvMP...74..145G. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.74.145.
  50. ^ "Quantum clocks guarantee precise navigation". The University of Adelaide. 9 July 2025.
  51. ^ Monro, Tanya (13 March 2019). "Quantum technologies for defence". Defence Science and Technology Group.
  52. ^ Zeilinger, Anton (8 December 2022). "Quantum mechanics and the nature of reality". NobelPrize.org.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Harold_Foppele/sandbox-5&oldid=1315094451"