Jump to content

User:Gsugihara/sandbox

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Empirical Dynamic Modelling (EDM, aka Emiprical Dynamics) is an analytical approach to studying nonlinear systems (such as ecosystems, financial systems, or human physiology) based on reconstructing the underlying attractor manifold of the system from observational time series.

Introduction

[edit]
Visual representation of trajectories on the Lorenz attractor

In the natural sciences dynamic systems are often described as a series of differential equations or difference equations, such as the three differential equations that define the classic Lorenz attractor. The equations completely determine how the system changes in time based on current conditions and capture the interactions between different variables. However, in more abstract mathematics a dynamical system is more fundamentally defined as a flow of trajectories on a multidimensional manifold.

When equations are already known for a system, the dynamic attractor can be obtained by integrating the equations through time. However, the dynamic attractor can also be recovered from time-series observations of the system without having to know the correct dynamic equations[1] [2]. Thus, while many analytical approaches seek to understand systems by studying or reconstructing underlying equations, empirical dynamic modeling centers on reconstructing the attractor manifold directly from data.


Attractor Reconstruction

[edit]

The central step in empirical dynamic modeling is reconstructing the attractor manifold and trajectories from time series. The process is grounded in the embedding theorems of Whitney and Takens, as well as their extensions.

Uses

[edit]

Forecasting

[edit]

Points that are nearby on the attractor manifold follow similar trajectories forward in time. This means that the behavior at one point on the manifold (e.g. that corresponds to the current conditions in an ecosystem) can be predicted based on the behavior of the system at other points in time when the system was in a similar state [3] . There are several implementations of this idea of nearest-neighbor forecasting including simplex projection [4] and S-maps [5] . Empircal dynamic modeling has been successfully applied to forecasting in many cases, including:

Note that if the system is chaotic, nearby trajectories on the attractor manifold eventually diverge, so forecasts in these cases are limited to short term behavior.

Classifying Dynamics

[edit]

Forecasting with EDM can be used as a practical criterion for distinguishing random noise from chaos [4] and distinguishing nonlinear dynamics from linear dynamics [5][8].

Causality

[edit]

Empirical dynamic modeling has given rise to convergent cross mapping (CCM), which is a practical method for determining causal relationships in nonlinear systems [9].

References

[edit]
  1. ^ N. Packard, J. Crutchfield, D. Farmer and R. Shaw (1980). "Geometry from a time series". Physical Review Letters. 45 (9): 712–716. Bibcode:1980PhRvL..45..712P. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.45.712.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  2. ^ F. Takens (1981). "Detecting strange attractors in turbulence". In D. A. Rand and L.-S. Young (ed.). Dynamical Systems and Turbulence, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 898. Springer-Verlag. pp. 366–381.
  3. ^ Farmer, J. Doyne; Sidorowich, John J. (24 August 1987). "Predicting chaotic time series". Phys. Rev. Lett. 59 (8): 845–848. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.59.845. PMID 10035887. Retrieved 6 February 2014.
  4. ^ a b c Sugihara, G.; R. M. May (19 April 1990). "Nonlinear forecasting as a way of distinguishing chaos from measurement error in time series" (PDF). Nature. 344 (6268): 734–741. doi:10.1038/344734a0. PMID 2330029. Retrieved 06 February 2014. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  5. ^ a b c Sugihara, George (15 September 1994). "Nonlinear Forecasting for the Classification of Natural Time Series" (PDF). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A. 348 (1688): 477-495. doi:10.1098/rsta.1994.0106. Retrieved 6 February 2014.
  6. ^ Kilcik, A.; Anderson, C. N. K.; Rozelot, J. P.; Ye, H.; Sugihara, G.; Ozguc, A. (10 March 2009). "Nonlinear prediction of solar cycle 24" (PDF). The Astrophysical Journal. 693 (2): 1173–1177. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/693/2/1173. Retrieved 6 February 2014.
  7. ^ Maye, Alexander; Hsieh, Chih-hao; Sugihara, George; Brembs, Björn (16 May 2007). "Order in spontaneous behavior". PLOS ONE. 2 (5): e443. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000443. PMC 1865389. PMID 17505542.
  8. ^ Hsieh, Chih-hao; et al. (19 May 2005). "Distinguishing random environmental fluctuations from ecological catastrophes for the North Pacific Ocean". Nature. 435 (7040): 336–340. doi:10.1038/nature03553. PMID 15902256.
  9. ^ Sugihara, George; et al. (26 October 2012). "Detecting Causality in Complex Ecosystems" (PDF). Science. 338 (6106): 496–500. doi:10.1126/science.1227079. PMID 22997134. Retrieved 5 July 2013.