User:Globaltv10/sandbox
Submission declined on 10 May 2025 by KylieTastic (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
| ![]() |
Operation Sindoor
Operation Sindoor was a significant military operation launched by India on May 7, 2025, in response to a terrorist attack in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir, which resulted in the deaths of 26 Indian tourists. The operation targeted terrorist infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-administered Kashmir, aiming to dismantle networks responsible for cross-border terrorism..[1] [2] [3]
Operation Sindoor: Objectives and Execution
Triggering Incident: The operation was initiated following a terrorist attack in Pahalgam on April 22, 2025, which India attributed to Pakistan-based militants.
Targets: India conducted 14 missile strikes over 23 minutes, targeting nine locations, including Bahawalpur and Muridke, known hubs for Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM) and Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT).
Weaponry: The Indian Air Force deployed Rafale jets equipped with SCALP cruise missiles and AASM Hammer bombs. Additionally, BrahMos cruise missiles and Indo-Israeli SkyStriker loitering munitions were utilized.
Outcomes: India reported the elimination of over 100 terrorists, including Abdul Rauf Azhar, a top JeM commander linked to the 2002 beheading of U.S. journalist Daniel Pearl. [4]
Strategic and Symbolic Significance OThe name "Sindoor" for the military operation was carefully chosen for its deep emotional and cultural resonance. In Indian tradition, sindoor is a red vermillion powder worn by married Hindu women along the parting of their hair, symbolizing their husband's presence and well-being. When a woman becomes widowed, she traditionally stops wearing sindoor—making its removal a visual marker of loss and grief. By naming the operation Sindoor, the Indian government sent a powerful symbolic message: the Pahalgam terror attack, which brutally killed 26 Indian tourists—most of them men—had left behind grieving wives and families, many of whom would now face life as widows.
This name was not just poetic, but profoundly humanizing. It reminded the country and the world that beyond military strategy and national security, the operation was a response to personal tragedy—to the heartbreak experienced by families who lost husbands, fathers, and sons in a senseless act of terror. The operation’s name turned the grief of the nation into a symbol of resolve, justice, and honor for those who were lost. By invoking a word so intimate and tied to personal identity and loss, India transformed the strike from a cold military maneuver into a tribute to its fallen citizens, especially the women and families left behind to carry their memories.
Military Strategy: India's use of advanced weaponry and precise targeting demonstrated a shift towards a more assertive military posture, aiming to dismantle terrorist networks without escalating into full-scale war. Operation Sindoor marked a significant victory for the Indian Air Force, both tactically and strategically. Launched in response to the brutal terrorist attack in Pahalgam that killed 26 Indian tourists, the IAF demonstrated exceptional precision and technological superiority by executing 14 high-impact strikes within 23 minutes on terrorist infrastructure deep inside Pakistan and Pakistan-administered Kashmir. The use of advanced Rafale jets equipped with SCALP cruise missiles, BrahMos missiles, and AASM Hammer bombs allowed India to eliminate over 100 terrorists, including top commander Abdul Rauf Azhar, without suffering any confirmed aircraft losses. In retaliation, when Pakistan launched drone and missile attacks on Indian territory, the IAF—supported by the Sudarshan Chakra air defense system—successfully intercepted more than 80% of the incoming threats, showcasing India's robust defense capabilities. This operation not only inflicted severe damage on terrorist networks but also sent a powerful deterrent message to Pakistan while avoiding full-scale war. The Indian Air Force's precise, controlled, and impactful response elevated its reputation globally, marking a turning point in India’s counter-terrorism strategy. [5]
International Reactions and Aftermath: Operation Sindoor not only marked a decisive military success for the Indian Air Force but also drew significant international attention and response, particularly due to the high-profile elimination of Abdul Rauf Azhar, a top Jaish-e-Mohammed commander. Former U.S. special envoy for Afghanistan, Zalmay Khalilzad, wrote on X (formerly Twitter): “India has killed the brutal terrorist assassin Abdul Rauf Azhar, whose psychopathic beheading of Wall Street Journal journalist Daniel Pearl in 2002 we all remember. Justice has been served.” This statement highlighted the global significance of Azhar's death, especially given his role in the gruesome murder of Daniel Pearl, a 38-year-old Jewish-American journalist who was working as the South Asia bureau chief for The Wall Street Journal. Pearl had moved to Karachi from New Delhi to investigate terror networks in the wake of the 9/11 attacks, only to be kidnapped and beheaded by terrorists including Abdul Rauf Azhar.
The operation was also met with widespread international concern regarding the potential for escalation between two nuclear-armed neighbors. While several global leaders, including those from the United States, United Kingdom, and European Union, urged both sides to exercise restraint, many countries quietly backed India’s right to self-defense and its stance against cross-border terrorism. Statements from Western diplomatic circles emphasized the importance of dismantling terror sanctuaries and expressed support for justice being served to those responsible for past atrocities. While Pakistan condemned the operation and called it unprovoked, India's actions were largely seen by the international community as a measured and justified response to an unprovoked act of terror. This wave of international acknowledgment not only strengthened India's diplomatic position but also underlined the success of Operation Sindoor beyond military terms—solidifying it as a strategic, moral, and political victory.
Timeline of the operation: Operation Sindoor, launched on May 7, 2025, stands as one of India’s most significant and well-executed military responses to terrorism in recent years. The operation was initiated as a direct retaliation to the brutal terrorist attack in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir, on April 22, which killed 26 Indian tourists and sent shockwaves across the nation. In response, the Indian government authorized a highly coordinated airstrike, spearheaded by the Indian Air Force (IAF), to target and dismantle terrorist infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-administered Kashmir. The name “Sindoor,” a symbolic reference to the red powder worn by married Hindu women, was chosen to reflect the loss and grief of the many widows left behind by the attack. The operation had both tactical and symbolic importance—aimed not just at punishing the perpetrators, but also sending a message that India would respond with strength and precision when provoked.
The operation began in the early hours of the morning, under the cover of darkness, to ensure maximum tactical advantage and minimize risk to Indian personnel. Over the span of just 23 minutes, the IAF executed 14 coordinated missile strikes on nine pre-identified terrorist hubs located in deep Pakistani territory, including Bahawalpur and Muridke, both well-known as operational centers of groups like Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM) and Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT). The strikes were made possible through the use of cutting-edge technology and weaponry. Rafale fighter jets deployed SCALP cruise missiles and AASM Hammer bombs, while land-based BrahMos supersonic missiles delivered additional blows to hardened targets. Furthermore, India used Israeli-origin SkyStriker loitering munitions—kamikaze drones capable of hovering over targets before striking with precision. These assets ensured minimal collateral damage while inflicting maximum damage on terror infrastructure.
One of the most critical and symbolic successes of Operation Sindoor was the elimination of **Abdul Rauf Azhar**, a senior commander of JeM and the younger brother of Masood Azhar. Abdul Rauf was not just a terror leader; he was globally infamous for orchestrating the kidnapping and beheading of American journalist Daniel Pearl in 2002—a crime that shocked the world. The former U.S. special envoy to Afghanistan, Zalmay Khalilzad, hailed his killing as a long-awaited moment of justice, writing: “India has killed the brutal terrorist assassin Abdul Rauf Azhar, whose psychopathic beheading of Wall Street Journal journalist Daniel Pearl in 2002 we all remember. Justice has been served.” Daniel Pearl had moved from New Delhi to Karachi to investigate terrorism in the wake of 9/11, only to be abducted and murdered by extremists like Azhar. His death had become a symbol of the barbarity of global terrorism, and with Azhar’s killing, India struck a major blow not only to JeM but to the international terror ecosystem.
Pakistan responded to the strikes by launching drones and missile attacks targeting Indian border cities such as Amritsar. However, India’s recently deployed **Sudarshan Chakra** air defense system proved its worth, intercepting over 80% of incoming threats. The IAF also scrambled fighter jets to patrol airspace and prevent any incursions. While Pakistan claimed to have downed Indian aircraft—claims unconfirmed by India—the overall strategic and tactical advantage clearly rested with the IAF. India demonstrated its ability to deliver surgical, high-value strikes deep within enemy territory and quickly shift to a defensive posture to contain escalation. The operation, importantly, avoided civilian casualties on both sides, reflecting the precision and discipline with which it was conducted. India also took diplomatic steps simultaneously—shutting down civil flights in border zones, suspending visas for Pakistani nationals, and ensuring international awareness of the reasons behind the strike.
Aftermath:International reaction to Operation Sindoor was swift but measured. While global powers such as the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European Union called for restraint and de-escalation, many nations quietly acknowledged India’s right to self-defense. The elimination of Abdul Rauf Azhar was seen as a just outcome, particularly in the U.S., where his involvement in the murder of Daniel Pearl had made him a wanted figure. While Pakistan condemned the operation as unprovoked aggression, India's calibrated and limited strike—targeting only terrorist assets—was viewed internationally as a proportional and responsible military action. The success of Operation Sindoor enhanced the credibility of the Indian Air Force, demonstrated India's growing technological and strategic capabilities, and sent a clear message: that terrorism would be met with swift, surgical, and uncompromising retaliation.
- ^ "India 'kills terrorist' behind beheading of US journalist in Pakistan strikes".
- ^ "Operation Sindoor: From Bahawalpur to Sialkot, here's all about the nine sites destroyed by India in 1 am strike". The Economic Times.
- ^ "'Silent, Invisible, Surprise Attacker': How Bengaluru-built 'SkyStriker' Drones Played Crucial Role in Operation Sindoor".
- ^ "India 'kills terrorist' behind beheading of US journalist in Pakistan strikes".
- ^ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_India%E2%80%93Pakistan_strikes?utm_source=chatgpt.com
- Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
- Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
- Essay-like writing
- Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
- Close paraphrasing
Please address these issues. The best way to do it is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.