In this one, at the bottom section ("2.3 Third message") [[3]] you will find all those false allegations in the form of insulting/pejorative phrases:
-- "...end to WP:EDITWAR;"
-- "...looks like WP:REVENGE aka;"
-- "WP:Overzealous_deletion;"
-- "Dislike_of_the_creator;"
-- "To justify the revert I added in the comment this is WP:disruptive editing;"
-- "One and a half hour later 2 anonymous IP addresses from the same btcentralplus.com network, that have never contributed to this article, reverted the 2 edits a 2nd time."
-- "This is WP:BRR ("Do not edit war."), and possible WP:SOCK:"
Every one of those insults are FALSE. I did not engage in any "EDITWAR," nor were my normal and proper edits motivated by "WP:REVENGE," nor by any desire to engage in "WP:Overzealous_deletion," nor were they done because I did not like the "creator." I didn't know who put those statements in the article, when I deleted them. By his own admission, Manning accused me of "WP:disruptive editing," as a means of justifying his reverting of my deletions. If any "Edit War" began, it was when he reverted my legitimate deletes. Since I did not turn around and revert him back, I was not guilty of engaging in any "EDITWAR." Other Editors then went on to revert him, apparently because they agreed with my reasons for those deletions. I do not know them and I did not consult with them, but he used that as a basis to level his scurrilous charge that I was acting as a "WP:SOCK." EditorASC (talk) 19:07, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
