User:Disembodied Poetics/Communication
| This is the sandbox page where you will draft your initial Wikipedia contribution.
If you're starting a new article, you can develop it here until it's ready to go live. If you're working on improvements to an existing article, copy only one section at a time of the article to this sandbox to work on, and be sure to use an edit summary linking to the article you copied from. Do not copy over the entire article. You can find additional instructions here. Remember to save your work regularly using the "Publish page" button. (It just means 'save'; it will still be in the sandbox.) You can add bold formatting to your additions to differentiate them from existing content. |
Lead
[edit]Communication (from Latin communicare, meaning "to share" or "to be in relation with")[1] is "an apparent answer to the painful divisions between self and other, private and public, and inner thought and outer word."[2] As that definition indicates, communication is difficult to define in a consistent manner,[3][4] because it is commonly used to refer to a wide range of different behaviors (broadly: "the transfer of information"[5]), or to limit what can be included in the category of communication (for example, requiring a "conscious intent" to persuade[6]). John Peters argues the difficulty of defining communication emerges from the fact that communication is both a universal phenomena (because everyone communicates), and a specific discipline of institutional academic study.[7]
One possible definition of communication is the act of individuals or groups through the use of sufficiently mutually understood signs, symbols, and semiotic conventions.
History of Communication
[edit]Many histories of the study of communication, particularly ones that emerging from the rhetorical tradition, begin in Ancient Greece,[8][9][10] evidenced succulently in Patricia Bizzell and Bruce Herzberg's introduction The Rhetorical Tradition, in which they argue that the development of rhetoric began in the 5th century inside of Greek democracy and probate courts.[11] However, other scholars note that communication, rhetoric, and explicit reflection on how one communicates is evidenced in the work of Enheduanna, the Sumerian Priestess and Poet, who also has the distinction of being "the first named historical author."[12] Carol S. Lipson and Roberta A. Brinkley argue that the focus on Greece as the starting point of the study of communication evidences a Western bias in understanding the history of communication, and functions to devalue the contribution of non-western sources.[13]
Etymologically, the word "communication" emerges out of latin, was taken up by scholars translating the Bible into latin, and emerged as a major concept in its contemporary sense after it was passed into English in the 14th and 15th centuries.[14]
Enheduanna
[edit]Sophistry, Plato, and Aristotle
[edit]Communicative goals
[edit]Transmission model of communication
[edit]Transaction model of communication
[edit]Constitutive model of communication
[edit]Types of communication
[edit]Non-Verbal Communication
[edit]Verbal Communication
[edit]Oral Communication
[edit]Written Communication
[edit]Visual Communication
[edit]Digital Communication
Communication skills
[edit]Understanding Barriers to Communication
[edit]Noise
[edit]Cultural Barriers
[edit]Canons of rhetoric
[edit]Listening
[edit]Fluency
[edit]Self-assessment
[edit]Communication as academic discipline
[edit]Applied communication
Communication education
Electronic and digital media
Health communication
International and intercultural communication
Interpersonal communication
[edit]Family communication
[edit]Legal communication
Mass communication and media literacy
Mediated and dispute resolution
Organizational communication
[edit]Performance studies
Political communication
[edit]Public address
Public relations
Rhetorical criticism
Small group communication
Visual communication
Barriers to communication
[edit]Communication (originating from Latin commūnicātiōn-, commūnicātiō, referring to the act of sharing or imparting)[15][16], and its etymological history connects it to concepts like "common", "commune", and "community"
is the collaborative process of constructing meaning between self and/or others within cultural contexts.[9] (is this plagiarism? the definition offered in the book is "communication is the collaborative construction of meaning between self and others as it occurs within cultural contexts")
In Claude Shannon's and Warren Weaver's influential model, human communication was imagined to function like a telephone or telegraph. Accordingly, they conceptualized communication as involving discrete steps:
- The formation of communicative motivation or reason.
- Message composition (further internal or technical elaboration on what exactly to express).
- Message encoding (for example, into digital data, written text, speech, pictures, gestures and so on).
- Transmission of the encoded message as a sequence of signals using a specific channel or medium.
- Noise sources such as natural forces and in some cases human activity (both intentional and accidental) begin influencing the quality of signals propagating from the sender to one or more receivers.
- Reception of signals and reassembling of the encoded message from a sequence of received signals.
- Decoding of the reassembled encoded message.
- Interpretation and making sense of the presumed original message.
These elements are now understood to be substantially overlapping and recursive activities rather than steps in a sequence. For example, communicative actions can commence before a communicator formulates a conscious attempt to do so, as in the case of phatics; likewise, communicators modify their intentions and formulations of a message in response to real-time feedback (e.g., a change in facial expression). Practices of decoding and interpretation are culturally enacted, not just by individuals (genre conventions, for instance, trigger anticipatory expectations for how a message is to be received), and receivers of any message operationalize their own frames of reference in interpretation.
The scientific study of communication can be divided into:
- Information theory which studies the quantification, storage, and communication of information in general;
- Communication studies which concerns human communication;
- Biosemiotics which examines communication in and between living organisms in general.
- Biocommunication which exemplifies sign-mediated interactions in and between organisms of all domains of life, including viruses.
The channel of communication can be visual, auditory, tactile/haptic (e.g. Braille or other physical means), olfactory, electromagnetic, or biochemical. Human communication is unique for its extensive use of abstract language. Development of civilization has been closely linked with progress in telecommunication.
Article body
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ Cobley, Paul (2008-06-05), Donsbach, Wolfgang (ed.), "Communication: Definitions and Concepts", The International Encyclopedia of Communication, Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, pp. wbiecc071, doi:10.1002/9781405186407.wbiecc071, ISBN 978-1-4051-8640-7, retrieved 2021-07-20
{{citation}}: CS1 maint: work parameter with ISBN (link) - ^ Peters, John Durham (1999). Speaking into the air : a history of the idea of communication. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. p. 2. ISBN 0-226-66276-4. OCLC 40452957.
- ^ Dance, Frank E. X. (1970-06-01). "The "Concept" of Communication". Journal of Communication. 20 (2): 201–210. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1970.tb00877.x. ISSN 0021-9916.
- ^ Craig, Robert T. (1999). "Communication Theory as a Field". Communication Theory. 9 (2): 119–161. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.1999.tb00355.x.
- ^ Littlejohn, Stephen; Foss, Karen (2009), "Definitions of Communication", Encyclopedia of Communication Theory, Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc., pp. 296–299, retrieved 2021-07-20
- ^ Miller, Gerald R. (1966-06-01). "On Defining Communication: Another Stab". Journal of Communication. 16 (2): 88–98. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1966.tb00020.x. ISSN 0021-9916.
- ^ Peters, John Durham (1986). "INSTITUTIONAL SOURCES OF INTELLECTUAL POVERTY IN COMMUNICATION RESEARCH". Communication Research. 13 (4): 527–559. doi:10.1177/009365086013004002. ISSN 0093-6502.
- ^ Smith, Craig R. (2017). Rhetoric and human consciousness : a history (5th ed.). Long Grove, Illinois: Waveland Press. ISBN 978-1-4786-3454-6. OCLC 982533908.
- ^ a b Warren, John T. (2018). Communication : a critical/cultural introduction. Deanna L. Fassett, Keith Nainby (3rd ed.). [San Diego, CA]: Cognella Academic Publishing. p. 11. ISBN 978-1-5165-2534-8. OCLC 1050450439.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: date and year (link) - ^ Sellnow, Deanna D. (2018). The rhetorical power of popular culture: considering mediated texts (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE. ISBN 978-1-5063-1521-8.
- ^ The rhetorical tradition : readings from classical times to the present. Patricia Bizzell, Bruce Herzberg (2nd ed.). Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's. 2001. ISBN 0-312-14839-9. OCLC 45832260.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: others (link) - ^ Binkley, Roberta (2004). "The Rhetoric of Origins and the Other: Reading the Ancient Figure of Enheduanna". Rhetoric before and beyond the Greeks. Carol Lipson, Roberta A. Binkley. Albany: State University of New York. p. 47. ISBN 1-4237-3988-4. OCLC 62365180.
- ^ Lipson, Carol S.; Brinkley, Roberta A. (2004). "Introduction". Rhetoric before and beyond the Greeks. Carol Lipson, Roberta A. Binkley. Albany: State University of New York. p. 3. ISBN 1-4237-3988-4. OCLC 62365180.
- ^ Peters, John Durham (2008), "Communication: History of the Idea", The International Encyclopedia of Communication, American Cancer Society, doi:10.1002/9781405186407.wbiecc075, ISBN 978-1-4051-8640-7, retrieved 2021-07-24
{{citation}}: CS1 maint: work parameter with ISBN (link) - ^ "communication, n." OED Online, Oxford University Press, June 2021, www.oed.com/view/Entry/37309. Accessed 20 July 2021.
- ^ "communication | Origin and meaning of communication by Online Etymology Dictionary". www.etymonline.com. Retrieved 2021-07-20.