User:Cguterman6/sandbox

Article Evaluation

Content

There is not very much information in this article. There is only an introductory section with definitions of the word airshed. The second sentence of the article uses technical jargon - "analytical or management unit" - without a wiki link or explanation. The definition of airshed should be made more clear and also more comprehensive. More information about airsheds and some pictures should be added to the article.

Tone

The text in the article has a neutral tone. No claims are made, and the article is not written from any one viewpoint.

Sources

There is only one source from this article. It is a presentation from the Environmental Ministry of British Columbia on air quality management that was made in 2011. The third sentence of the article is a different quote from the source. The source is linked at Wayback Machine, and the link to the original source of the file does not work. There is a banner at the top of the article stating that more references are needed.

Talk Page

There's only one note on the article's talk page, titled "what happens." from 2009. I do not know what this note means. The article is part of WikiProject Weather. It is a stub-class article of low importance.