User:CfbLU/Evaluate an Article
 | Evaluate an article
Complete your article evaluation below. Here are the key aspects to consider: Lead sectionA good lead section defines the topic and provides a concise overview. A reader who just wants to identify the topic can read the first sentence. A reader who wants a very brief overview of the most important things about it can read the first paragraph. A reader who wants a quick overview can read the whole lead section.
ContentA good Wikipedia article should cover all the important aspects of a topic, without putting too much weight on one part while neglecting another.
Tone and BalanceWikipedia articles should be written from a neutral point of view; if there are substantial differences of interpretation or controversies among published, reliable sources, those views should be described as fairly as possible.
Sources and ReferencesA Wikipedia article should be based on the best sources available for the topic at hand. When possible, this means academic and peer-reviewed publications or scholarly books.
Organization and writing qualityThe writing should be clear and professional, the content should be organized sensibly into sections.
Images and Media
Talk page discussionThe article's talk page — and any discussions among other Wikipedia editors that have been taking place there — can be a useful window into the state of an article, and might help you focus on important aspects that you didn't think of.
Overall impressions
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved. |
Which article are you evaluating?
[edit]Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
[edit]I chose it because poetry is an important sub-interest within culture. Poetry exists all over the world, and is a very old literary tradition. Poetry matters because it captures emotions and experiences in a way that ordinary language cannot, making the personal universal. It challenges us to see the world differently, using rhythm, imagery, and metaphor to deepen our understanding. My preliminary impression of the article was good, with a balance of sections and plenty of information and references/citations.
Evaluate the article
[edit]The Wikipedia article "Outline of poetry" serves as a comprehensive guide to the subject, detailing various forms, historical periods, elements, and notable poets. It effectively organizes information into sections. However, the article could benefit from additional citations to authoritative sources to enhance its credibility and depth.
In terms of comprehensiveness, the article covers a broad spectrum of poetic forms, as well as diverse periods and movements like Augustan poetry and Modernist poetry. It also goes into the technical aspects of poetry, discussing elements like meter, rhyme schemes, and stanza forms. While the article mentions different poetic forms and movements, some sections lack detailed explanations or examples, which could improve reader understanding.
Regarding neutrality, the article maintains an objective tone, presenting information factually without apparent bias. However, the depth of coverage varies across topics; some areas are well-explored, while others are only briefly mentioned. Expanding on lesser-covered topics and balancing attention across sections would improve the article's neutrality and comprehensiveness.
The article's structure is logical, with clear headings and subheadings that facilitate navigation. The inclusion of internal links to related Wikipedia articles allows readers to explore topics in more detail. Nevertheless, the article would benefit from a more consistent use of citations throughout, as some sections lack references, making it difficult to verify the information presented.