User:Brontosh/Evaluate an Article
 | Evaluate an article
Complete your article evaluation below. Here are the key aspects to consider: Lead sectionA good lead section defines the topic and provides a concise overview. A reader who just wants to identify the topic can read the first sentence. A reader who wants a very brief overview of the most important things about it can read the first paragraph. A reader who wants a quick overview can read the whole lead section.
ContentA good Wikipedia article should cover all the important aspects of a topic, without putting too much weight on one part while neglecting another.
Tone and BalanceWikipedia articles should be written from a neutral point of view; if there are substantial differences of interpretation or controversies among published, reliable sources, those views should be described as fairly as possible.
Sources and ReferencesA Wikipedia article should be based on the best sources available for the topic at hand. When possible, this means academic and peer-reviewed publications or scholarly books.
Organization and writing qualityThe writing should be clear and professional, the content should be organized sensibly into sections.
Images and Media
Talk page discussionThe article's talk page — and any discussions among other Wikipedia editors that have been taking place there — can be a useful window into the state of an article, and might help you focus on important aspects that you didn't think of.
Overall impressions
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved. |
Which article are you evaluating?
[edit]Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
[edit]I chose this article because I enjoy drinking Suja Juice and have for many years. It is also based near where I grew up, and I appreciate the contents and advertising.
Evaluate the article
[edit]I didn't find anything that was distracting to the topic of the article. The lead of the article is very concise and introduces the juice company well. I found the content helpful because it mentions the history of the company and also discusses the nutritional aspects of the product. There is not much of a voice in the article because it is just simply explaining what the juice company is, so there are not major opinions. The source links work but they are quite a few years old, so that needs updating. I don't see any spelling or grammatical errors. There is a lack of images, especially a lack of images of the actual packaging and bottles the juices come in. It is a part of the WikiProject California and was interestingly nominated for deletion in February of 2020, but hasn't received any ratings. The article's strength is its conciseness, but its weakness also was how old the references are and the lack of information from recent years within the company. I think it was developed well but again not recently.