User:Birdsthatfly/sandbox
For addition to the shade avoidance article:
In addition, the time at which a plant starts to flower is affected by the amount of available light.
Cerdán, P., Chory, J. Regulation of flowering time by light quality. Nature 423, 881–885 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01636
For addition to the circadian rhythm article:
It has previously been found that matching a plant’s circadian rhythm to its external environment’s light and dark cycles has the potential to positively affect the plant.[1] Researchers came to this conclusion by performing experiments on three different varieties of Arabidopsis thaliana. One of these varieties had a normal 24-hour circadian cycle.[1] The other two varieties were mutated, one to have a circadian cycle of more than 27 hours, and one to have a shorter than normal circadian cycle of 20 hours.[1]
The Arabidopsis with the 24-hour circadian cycle was grown in three different environments.[1] One of these environments had a 20-hour light and dark cycle (10 hours of light and 10 hours of dark), the other had a 24-hour light and dark cycle (12 hours of light and 12 hours of dark),and the final environment had a 28-hour light and dark cycle (14 hours of light and 14 hours of dark).[1] The two mutated plants were grown in both an environment that had a 20-hour light and dark cycle and in an environment that had a 28-hour light and dark cycle.[1] It was found that the variety of Arabidopsis with a 24-hour circadian rhythm cycle grew best in an environment that also had a 24-hour light and dark cycle.[1] Overall, it was found that all the varieties of Arabidopsis thaliana had greater levels of chlorophyll and increased growth in environments whose light and dark cycles matched their circadian rhythm.[1]
Researchers suggested that a reason for this could be that matching an Arabidopsis’s circadian rhythm to its environment could allow the plant to be better prepared for dawn and dusk, and thus be able to better synchronize its processes.[1] In this study, it was also found that the genes that help to control chlorophyll peaked a few hours after dawn.[1] This appears to be consistent with the proposed phenomenon known as metabolic dawn.[2]
According to the metabolic dawn hypothesis, sugars produced by photosynthesis have potential to help regulate the circadian rhythm and certain photosynthetic and metabolic pathways.[2][3] As the sun rises, more light becomes available, which normally allows more photosynthesis to occur.[2] The sugars produced by photosynthesis repress PRR7.[4] This repression of PRR7 then leads to the increased expression of CCA1.[4] On the other hand, decreased photosynthetic sugar levels increase PRR7 expression and decrease CCA1 expression.[2] This feedback loop between CCA1 and PRR7 is what is proposed to cause metabolic dawn.[2][5]
 | This is a user sandbox of Birdsthatfly. You can use it for testing or practicing edits. This is not the place where you work on your assigned article for a dashboard.wikiedu.org course. Visit your Dashboard course page and follow the links for your assigned article in the My Articles section. |
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j Dodd, A. N., Salathia, N., Hall, A., Kévei, E., Tóth, R., Nagy, F., ... & Webb, A. A. (2005). Plant circadian clocks increase photosynthesis, growth, survival, and competitive advantage. Science, 309(5734), 630-633.
- ^ a b c d e Dodd, A. N., Belbin, F. E., Frank, A., & Webb, A. A. (2015). Interactions between circadian clocks and photosynthesis for the temporal and spatial coordination of metabolism. Frontiers in plant science, 6, 245.
- ^ Webb, A. A., Seki, M., Satake, A., & Caldana, C. (2019). Continuous dynamic adjustment of the plant circadian oscillator. Nature communications, 10(1), 1-9.
- ^ a b Haydon, M. J., Mielczarek, O., Robertson, F. C., Hubbard, K. E., & Webb, A. A. (2013). Photosynthetic entrainment of the Arabidopsis thaliana circadian clock. Nature, 502(7473), 689–692.
- ^ Farré, E. M., & Kay, S. A. (2007). PRR7 protein levels are regulated by light and the circadian clock in Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal, 52(3), 548-560.