User:Binxiepie/sandbox
 | Evaluate an article
Complete your article evaluation below. Here are the key aspects to consider: Lead sectionA good lead section defines the topic and provides a concise overview. A reader who just wants to identify the topic can read the first sentence. A reader who wants a very brief overview of the most important things about it can read the first paragraph. A reader who wants a quick overview can read the whole lead section.
ContentA good Wikipedia article should cover all the important aspects of a topic, without putting too much weight on one part while neglecting another.
Tone and BalanceWikipedia articles should be written from a neutral point of view; if there are substantial differences of interpretation or controversies among published, reliable sources, those views should be described as fairly as possible.
Sources and ReferencesA Wikipedia article should be based on the best sources available for the topic at hand. When possible, this means academic and peer-reviewed publications or scholarly books.
Organization and writing qualityThe writing should be clear and professional, the content should be organized sensibly into sections.
Images and Media
Talk page discussionThe article's talk page — and any discussions among other Wikipedia editors that have been taking place there — can be a useful window into the state of an article, and might help you focus on important aspects that you didn't think of.
Overall impressions
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved. |
Which article are you evaluating?
[edit]Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
[edit]I chose this article because the New York Red bulls are somewhat native to me as a soccer club so I find it interesting as an article to evaluate. It is also listed as a "C-class" article and I believe there can be more information, facts, and events that add to further improve the history and depth of the article itself. Overall, I see that there is potential to expand upon this article to reinforce the history of the team.
Evaluate the article
[edit]Lead Section
The article on the New York RedBulls properly opens up with a lead section that clearly describes the articles topic in the first few sentences. The lead section mainly includes a breif description of the major sections but information on previous stadiums played at could be added. Lead section does not include information that that is not present in the article. and lead section is concise.
Content
Article has relevant content to the topic but could use a bit more content in certain areas. Content is up to date with information including stadiums, coaches, rosters, game attendance, seems to be added on frequently.
Tone and Balance
Article is neutral and does not show any bias or tries to sway people
Sources and References
Mostly sourced from sports news, MLS coverage and press releases. Some sections are well cited while others are brief and outdated with limited perspectives beyond the mainstream sports media. Stronger sources like peer reviewed studies or US soccer books could improve credibility.
Organization and Writing Quality
Article is clear and easy to read and avoids grammatical errors and spelling errors. Organizes sections like history, stadiums, players, and achievements well. Some sections are uneven, certain sections are detailed while others like culture and rivalries and a little more undeveloped.
Images and Media
Article uses good images that enhance understanding of the Red Bulls. Images are well captioned and follow Wikipedia's copyright regulations. Article could benefit from more images showcasing things like supporters, rivalries or historic moments to provide more visual context
Talk Page Discussion
Talk page shows editors focusing on accuracy, balance and keeping the articles up to date. It is rated a start class or C-class making it useful but still needs more depth and stronger sources.
Overall Impressions
The new York Red Bulls Wikipedia article is in fair condition, offering a solid overview of the team but still lacking the depth of a full article. This articles strengths include clear organization, reliable basic facts, and good use of images. It is underdeveloped in areas like supporters culture, rivalries, community impact, and updated player/season information. To improve it will need more current sources, expanded content and better balance across sections.
 | This is the sandbox page for User:Binxiepie (diff). |