Note on file Usernames that promote a controversial or potentially inflammatory point of view may be in violation of the username policy due to creating a hostile editing environment. -- DQB (owner / report) 01:20, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 04:30, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
This username matched "Attempting to skip filters using multiple similar characters" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 04:30, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
Note on file Multiple special characters can be contained in the same phrase, this rule detects when one or more occurs. -- DQB (owner / report) 04:30, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
Same name as article they are editing. Left autobiography template. Secretlondon (talk) 12:56, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or, failing that, the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP-hopping user persistently deletes content without any sort of consensus. ɴᴋᴏɴ21❯❯❯talk 22:11, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Protected by Mifter on 2017-03-25: "Considering the main page was unprotected by a compromised sysop semi recently, perhaps transcluding it to a cascade protected page will provide a small increase in protection"
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
Requested this permission ~2 months ago, denied because I was mostly creating auto-notable stubs. I think I have expanded the types of articles I create, including well-sourced local pages or biographical entries where I take time to source subjects that do not inherently meet a generic notability criteria. (I still do create auto-notable pages sometimes, but those no longer make up the majority of pages I create.) As a new page reviewer, I got good experience with the notability guidelines reviewing articles during the backlog drive WP:MAY25, and also participating in AfD. Thought about requesting again as I have run into a few of my own pages while reviewing pages that are in topics I contribute to/am interested in. Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 02:15, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
Also wanted to mention that if I am unsure of a subject's notability, I will utilize WP:AFC for my own articles occasionally Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 02:18, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has had 1 request for autopatrolled declined in the past 90 days ([1]). — MusikBottalk 02:20, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
Came here to request this permission for a different user, but since Yoblyblob is referencing their WP:MAY25 NPP work, it is worth noting that among the re-reviews of each patroller's work, 14/17 of their patrol decisions were approved. Of the remainder, two were drafted/redirected as WP:TOOSOON coverage of 2026 state elections and one was drafted for lacking enough coverage to qualify under WP:NEVENT. Considering they were the fifth most active patroller of the drive, this accuracy is good, not great. ViridianPenguin🐧 (💬) 19:20, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
I have been on Wikipedia for more than a decade, and I truly feel that it is one of my great passions in life. I have more than 30,000 edits, and I am credited with more than 300 articles that are not Redirects or Disambiguation pages. (I personally take credit for more than 100 of these, which did not originate as Redirect pages.) Although I continue to propose Draft pages to this day when I am not 100% confident myself about notability, I frequently go straight to the mainspace and have made a number of articles that have been significant in some form or field, with my particular focus being on film industry and electoral politics pages.
Recently, I redirected a few thousand Supreme Court of the United States cases to the case volumes in which they were listed. It was a large-scale project for me, but in the end it was decided that redlinks would be better for promoting caseload knowledge, something that I agreed to and I believe will continue to service our Wikipedia community. For this reason, it might appear that I have a large number of deleted pages, but this is almost exclusively due to this particular project; I had an edit deletion rate of less than 2%, and I had not had a page that I created taken down in years, not since I was a far more novice editor. (You can read more about that SCOTUS discussion here.)
I believe that being autopatrolled will continue to allow me to contribute to the Wikipedia community, and that is why I am reaching out to ask for permissions. I am happy to answer any questions or improve any articles that I have created if there is anything noticeable that needs help. Although I have long been looking to increase my permissions and role in the community, I quite frankly have always had impostor syndrome stop me from asking, but a bit of encouragement from Liz made me try. Thank you so much! PickleG13 (talk) 20:27, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
I'm not inclined to grant autopatrolled so soon after the SCOTUS redirect deletions, but won't object if another admin wants to grant it. voorts (talk/contributions) 01:51, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
Thank you for your honest feedback, voorts. Although I hope that an admin decides to grant it, I have been on Wikipedia for a long time and I will continue to for a long time to come no matter what. Please let me know if you ever need help with anything, whether it's a full-scale project or a simple clean-up. PickleG13 (talk) 21:47, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
I was granted a two month trial for this. Have created 100+ articles with 10K+ edits and will continue to do so. CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 23:19, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
Automated comment This user was granted temporary autopatrolled rights by Dr vulpes (expires 00:00, 15 July 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBottalk 23:20, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
I have created over 25 new articles that meet notability guidelines and follow Wikipedia standards and guideliness. I am familiar with Wikipedia’s core content policies (NPOV, V, NOR) and believe that being autopatrolled will reduce the workload on new page patrollers, my ittention for contributing to Wikipedia, i have mention to my talk page, also to be noted i am reviewer and patroller at Albanian wiki with all articles, neither deleted, and noone of edits are reverted. Thank you in advance. Lanceloth345 (talk) 12:43, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
Hey Lanceloth345, could you comment on why Petrit Malaj was deleted a few weeks ago, and what you improved when you recreated it? (Courtesy ping for Sphilbrick, who deleted under CSD G12.) Similarlly with Gjesti, which is currently in draftspace. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 13:08, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
Page Petrit Malaj was recreated again in neutral way + more sources, becouse first version had some words "sounding" not neutral at all, (my fault) as per draft:Gjesti lacking notability it's under review but explained at talk page of draft page reasons why he is notable ect. (also partecipating other editor in discussion). Lanceloth345 (talk) 13:13, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
Been an active user for a few years, created 25+ articles with the only two deletions being mistakenly created redirects (due to a script error). Multiple GAs and FLs. I understand enwiki notability guidelines thoroughly.ULPS(talk • contribs) 22:51, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Support! Low article creation activity in the trailing year, but I'm somewhat familiar with ULPS's work, and would consider him trustworthy enough for autopatrolled. Spot-checks for copyright concerns and sourcing turn up no issues. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 15:45, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
As part of the Women in Red project, I create pages about women by translating, adapting, and improving articles from the Spanish Wikipedia. Onatic (talk) 21:00, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Slightly below the recommended 25 creations before nomination, but this editor has a track record of writing quality content that I don't believe NPP needs to continue reviewing. No issues found spot-checking their recent creations. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 21:26, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has created roughly 21 articles. — MusikBottalk 21:31, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Demonstrates understanding of the notability guidelines on a variety of subjects. The articles are fairly well-written and -formatted; a few are also now GAs. I marked a couple of her newer creations as reviewed and found no major issues. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 21:31, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
I have created more than 25 non redirect articles within the past few weeks and 53 non redirects overall. The two mainspace ones that have been deleted were by my own request, thanks to a slip of the "Publish changes" button. Aside from those, all have been approved by the adminteam. I would greatly be thankful to receive this permission. Luxtaythe2nd (Talk to me...) 17:56, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
I have created over 650 new articles and hope to continue contributing to Wikipedia and knowledge sharing. TinaLees-Jones (talk) 03:38, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
I would like to request the autopatrolled user right. I have created around 30 well-sourced, policy-compliant articles on the English Wikipedia.
In addition to my contributions here, I am an administrator (sysop) on the Persian Wikipedia (fa.wikipedia), where I have been active for many years, focusing on content creation, vandalism control, and community support.
Granting this right would help reduce the workload of new page patrollers, as my article creations usually meet Wikipedia’s quality standards.
Thank you very much for your time and consideration.
Best regards, Shahnamk (talk) 19:08, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
I would like to request the autopatrolled user right. I’ve created several articles, many of which are currently live and meet Wikipedia’s guidelines on notability and reliable sourcing.
I’m familiar with the key content policies such as WP:N, WP:V, WP:RS, and WP:NPOV, and consistently apply them when creating or editing articles.
I understand that this permission is intended to reduce the workload of new page reviewers by marking trusted users’ pages as reviewed automatically, and I believe my contributions demonstrate the consistency and policy alignment expected for this role.
I have not received any blocks or serious warnings, and I’m committed to continuing constructive, policy-compliant editing.
Thank you for your time and consideration. Sweetabena (talk) 23:39, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
As a part of Wikipedia: Tambayan Philippines and the Music Task Force, I would like to request the autopatrolled user right. I have created over 25 articles, most of which are currently live and have been built with careful attention to WP:N, WP:V, and reliable sourcing. And also I understand that the autopatrolled right is meant to ease the workload of new page reviewrs by automatically marking new pages from trusted users as reviewed. Thank you! AdobongPogimasarap 🍛 04:21, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
Cognifex (t·th·c·del·cross-wiki·SUL·edit counter· pages created (xtools·sigma) ·non-automated edits·BLP edits·undos·manual reverts·rollbacks·logs(blocks·rights·moves)·rfar·spi·cci) (assign permissions)(acc·ap·ev·fm·mms·npr·pm·pc·rb·te) I am requesting the autopatrolled user right. I have been an active contributor for over a month, with more than 1,700 edits across diverse topics, particularly in Indian biographies, cinema, history, and culture. I consistently adhere to Wikipedia's content policies, including notability, verifiability, and neutral point of view. Several of my articles have been successfully accepted through the Articles for Creation (AfC) process. Granting me autopatrolled rights would help reduce the workload on new page reviewers by allowing trusted users like myself to create articles without requiring manual review. Thank you for your time and consideration.
Automated comment This user has created roughly 7 articles. — MusikBottalk 10:10, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
Requesting AWB permissions to assist with cleanup tasks. I'm active in Wikipedia Tambayan especially in the Music Task Force. My goal is to help fix small issues like outdated links, minor grammar problems, and other maintenance tasks on related articles, especially those that haven't been updated in a while. Thank you! AdobongPogimasarap 🍛 09:55, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
I would like to do cleanups after requested moves, in particular fixing links to go to the main article instead of a redirect. Dantus21 (talk) 01:20, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
I disagree, but feel free to deny my request, or if you want I can retract it. Dantus21 (talk) 05:17, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
It does seem reasonable to use AWB for this purpose (changing mistargeted wikilinks does not seem fun to do by hand, especially if it comes into the hundreds), albeit it might be a good time to see if there's consensus for this type of usage if there hasn't been any relevant discussions. Tenshi! (Talk page) 20:02, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for the event coordinator flag.
Event coordinator
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
There are no outstanding requests for the file mover flag.
File mover
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
Reason for requesting mass message sender rights Gvihar 21:39, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
Not done besides the lack of reason above, you also do not appear to have any experience in this process. If you are trying to coordinate sending your first mass message, you may request assistance at WT:MMS. — xaosfluxTalk 13:12, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
Hi, I’m re-applying for NPP permission after a three-month trial. I haven’t been a super prolific reviewer (90 articles + 38 redirects) but I’ve also done more content creation, de-stubbing, and AfD which I hope also helps demonstrate my understanding of the key principles. I’ve found NPP quite rewarding and would love to continue working. Zzz plant (talk) 21:15, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Sohom Datta (expires 00:00, 26 July 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBottalk 21:20, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
track record looks good, Donesigned, Rosguilltalk 19:43, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
I am requesting for this permission to help address the backlog of unreviewed pages and to ensure the quality of new content submitted uses encyclopedic language and that the content is accurate and neutral. I have participated in hundreds of AfDs and during that time I have developed a solid understanding of WP:GNG, RS requirements (WP:SIGCOV), and other relevant policies for reviewing pages. Gjb0zWxOb (talk) 21:23, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions and your interest in this permission. Reviewing your recent contributions, however, I'm concerned that War on Crypto and the attendant page move discussion demonstrates a weak understanding of WP:TITLE. I'm also doubtful of some other editorial decisions, such as having an entire section on "Views on Bitcoin" in Lyn Alden. Not donesigned, Rosguilltalk 19:43, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Hello, isn't this decision usually determined by a more objective set of criteria than only the subject matter content of the edits? This seems subjective to me and is based on the topics I am interested in and good faith disagreements between me and other parties made on that matter rather than being made strictly on policy. Given my AfD history, I clearly understand what makes a notable, reliable page and what does not.
Would it be possible for another admin to look at my AfD history among other factors to consider if I am eligible for this perm? Gjb0zWxOb (talk) 12:18, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
I think that War on Crypto is a pretty clear-cut misapplication of WP:TITLE. By contrast, War on crypto would have been defensible in my evaluation, but that's not the title you chose. signed, Rosguilltalk 18:04, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
No issue with this improvement. The page move has already been completed to now be titled "War on crypto" Gjb0zWxOb (talk) 16:18, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
I've undone this move, as the ongoing RM should be allowed to unfold and followed. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 16:26, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
Please revert it back to War on crypto, I agreed with concerns about the capital “C” in “Crypto.” Then we can still discuss which title is best. Gjb0zWxOb (talk) 17:07, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
I received notification that my NPP rights will expire on July 26, 2025. If you believe I have performed satisfactorily during my NPP probationary period. Please renew my position as an NPP reviewer. Thank you. Bakhtar40 (talk) 09:27, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Sohom Datta (expires 00:00, 26 July 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBottalk 09:30, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Track record looks good, Donesigned, Rosguilltalk 18:57, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Hello! I am applying to renew my patroller user right after a notification on my talk page. I'm not sure what I am supposed to write here, but feel free to ask me questions 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨Abo Yemen (𓃵) 19:59, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Callanecc (expires 00:00, 31 July 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBottalk 20:02, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Track record looks good, Donesigned, Rosguilltalk 19:06, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I would like to request New Page Reviewer rights to support efforts in curating new content and reducing the existing backlog. Over the course of my contributions, I’ve developed a strong understanding of key content policies, including WP:N, WP:RS, and WP:BLP, and I’ve actively participated in AfD discussions and improved multiple articles. My goal is to ensure that newly created pages meet Wikipedia's standards for neutrality, sourcing, and notability. As an AfD participant, I’ve gained experience in identifying promotional or non-notable content and would like to expand my activity towards this area. Thank you for your time and consideration. Lorraine Crane (talk) 04:50, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Done for 1 month as a trial, after which you may reapply signed, Rosguilltalk 19:08, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
I'm interested in helping reduce the backlog, especially for articles under Wikipedia Tambayan, with a focus on topics in the Music Task Force. Some pages tend to sit unreviewed for quite a while, based on what i've seen, and it would be great to help move them along. There's also I have experience in AfD discussions, particularly when it comes to looking into suspicious or possibly non-notable articles. Thank you! AdobongPogimasarap 🍛 09:45, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Done for 1 month as a trial run, after which you may reapply signed, Rosguilltalk 19:11, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
I've been involved in WP for a long time now, with a very clean record. I've used AWB and other tools previously, and also previously patrolled new pages. I'm starting to want to combine more administrative/cleanup tasks with those of my usual article creation, and have noticed the backlog of new pages. I've got a strong grasp of WP policies, the AFD, CSD, etc processes, and talkpage rating, categorising, etc, and will be able to put these to good use reviewing and improving new articles. SɱαɾƚყPαɳƚʂ22 (Ⓣⓐⓛⓚ) 00:38, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Done for 1 month as a trial run, after which you may reapply signed, Rosguilltalk 19:15, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Hello! I've been an editor in good standing ever since first creating my account over 18 years ago. My activity has fluctuated with my ability to find time to edit, but after many years of editing, participating in AfD, and contributing to various WikiProjects, I feel like I've gotten to a pretty good place when it comes to my knowledge of notability and sourcing policies. I'd love to take this step to begin clearing the backlog and ensuring new pages maintain high standards! nf utvol (talk) 00:55, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Done for 1 month as a trial run, after which you may reapply signed, Rosguilltalk 19:14, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
I am requesting the New Page Reviewer user right. I have created approximately 30 well-sourced articles on the English Wikipedia and am familiar with notability guidelines and general content policies.
I also serve as an administrator (sysop) on the Persian Wikipedia (fa.wikipedia), where I have extensive experience in article review, patrolling, and enforcing content policies.
I would like to help maintain article quality on the English Wikipedia by reviewing new pages, identifying issues, and supporting other reviewers.
Thank you for your consideration.
Best regards, Shahnamk (talk) 19:09, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has 174 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBottalk 19:10, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Not done, you do not meet the minimum prerequisites for this permission. Additionally, you appear to be using AI to write articles at a fast pace without sufficient proofreading (Dariush Navidgouyi seems like a particularly concerning example, but the general speed of your new page creations alone is concerning). signed, Rosguilltalk 19:19, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
Mainly requesting so I can bold move pages to multi-revision redirects, but I may cautiously move into closing RMs one day. I think I have decent experience from participating at WP:RMC and understand the guidelines reasonably well. Thanks, Kowal2701 (talk) 10:58, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Technically, if you would normally have bold moved a page (uncontroversial, do not expect opposition) but couldn't for technical reasons, WP:RM/TR would be the better way to do it since it avoids the 7 day listing period of a full RM. This is not a comment on the actual merits of granting or not granting though, which I'll leave to the patrolling admins. Alpha3031 (t • c) 19:02, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
If people don’t think I need the tool or that the benefit doesn’t outweigh the potential costs just say and I’ll retract this Kowal2701 (talk) 22:37, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Please be patient, you only asked a few days ago and perm requests are rarely handled same-day. Primefac (talk) 23:12, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Mb, I just saw one answered below and assumed it wasn’t a no-brainer Kowal2701 (talk) 08:31, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
I've been involved in a few page swaps recently following move requests - however, I've been unable to complete them due to the default permissions leaving behind redirects, which is undesirable when swapping pages. I'd like to be able to carry out such moves without having to request technical support. Danners430tweaks made 17:00, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
Not done I don't think you have enough experience for this yet; you have only two RMTR requests, relatively low RM participation, and only 13 total uses of the move tool. Spend some time making requests to RMTR that get consistently approved (to prove you know when that is appropriate) and only then request page mover rights. * Pppery *it has begun... 00:14, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
I often patrol the recent changes page and would like to help out more by reviewing changes. I am relatively new to Wikipedia compared to others; however, I have edited many times over the years before I made this account. I have also long been a fan of Wikipedia and would like to help out further. I believe I fit the criteria to get this permission. Otherwise, I understand and would appreciate feedback. Pencilceaser123 (talk) 04:47, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
I'm requesting pending changes reviewer rights and I'm really like to help keep articles under pending changes protection well maintained. I've seen some pages get vandalize or change without explanation, and I'd like to help by reviewing those edits and making sure only useful ones go through. AdobongPogimasarap 🍛 09:25, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights: I would like to help on Wikipedia to combat vandalism and I am an avid editor as well. Theeverywhereperson (talk here) 18:17, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has 69 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBottalk 18:20, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Not done Too little experience, recent edit warring does not bode well. * Pppery *it has begun... 00:15, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
Hello, I'd like to get rollback rights to fight vandalism more effectively. While I don't patrol recent pages often, I do patrol new pages and short pages, where I frequently undo obvious vandalism (as seen in [2]). I'd like rollback to more easily undo edits, as well as access huggle and other tools. Yelps ᘛ⁐̤ᕐᐷ critique me 08:24, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I want to receive a rollback right because there are a lot of editors who add informations but not citing sources. Usually, they do not add unsourced informations at once, but they add them by multiple times. There are also edits violating MoS or Wikipedia policies. And I have struggled with reverting all of them one by one, so I decided to request a right for rollback. Thank you. Camilasdandelions (talk!) 03:56, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([3]). — MusikBottalk 04:00, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Oops, my notification didn't notice that reply. I'm sorry for it. Camilasdandelions (talk!) 09:55, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I am requesting Rollback rights to help stop vandalism. I have made more than 2000 edits on Wikipedia since 2021. I understand how rollback works and will use it only when needed.
I am a budding copyeditor with a growing number of watched pages to police for vandalism. Unfortunately, some vandals use multiple revisions, making it tedious and time-consuming to fix without a rollback permission. Thank you for your considerations. OceanLoop (talk) 13:19, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
I would like to make a comparatively minor change to Template:TERYT as requested by Altenmann on the template's talk page. However, even though I created this template, it has had its protection level set. Kiwipete (talk) 04:04, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
It looks like that has gone unprocessed primarily because it was dequeued from having an active edit request. If this is one-off issue, I think the best solution would be to just put {{edit protected|answered=no}} back on the page, and a patrolling template editor should process it. (the backlog at Category:Wikipedia template-protected edit requests isn't usually very long). — xaosfluxTalk 13:19, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
This is not an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user this page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original page is located at Waters http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Calmer Waters.
