User:AzlynPorter/Evaluate an Article
![]() | Evaluate an article
Complete your article evaluation below. Here are the key aspects to consider: Lead sectionA good lead section defines the topic and provides a concise overview. A reader who just wants to identify the topic can read the first sentence. A reader who wants a very brief overview of the most important things about it can read the first paragraph. A reader who wants a quick overview can read the whole lead section.
ContentA good Wikipedia article should cover all the important aspects of a topic, without putting too much weight on one part while neglecting another.
Tone and BalanceWikipedia articles should be written from a neutral point of view; if there are substantial differences of interpretation or controversies among published, reliable sources, those views should be described as fairly as possible.
Sources and ReferencesA Wikipedia article should be based on the best sources available for the topic at hand. When possible, this means academic and peer-reviewed publications or scholarly books.
Organization and writing qualityThe writing should be clear and professional, the content should be organized sensibly into sections.
Images and Media
Talk page discussionThe article's talk page — and any discussions among other Wikipedia editors that have been taking place there — can be a useful window into the state of an article, and might help you focus on important aspects that you didn't think of.
Overall impressions
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved. |
Which article are you evaluating?
[edit]Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
[edit]I'm working towards my B.S. in Nutrition and have always been interested in "fad diets". I know a decent amount about current diet trends, such as keto, the carnivore diet, veganism, the Mediterranean diet, etc. I remember the hype around these types of extreme diets when I was young, I particularly remember the "banana" diet where you were allowed to eat as many as you wanted, but only bananas. I thought this article would show me if there's any benefit to this diet or not, it's history, and if it's still practiced anywhere in the modern era.
Evaluate the article
[edit]The article's introduction does clearly describe the Cabbage soup diet. It does not outwardly point out the sections, but since it is a short article I believe it could be implied. It mentions specifically that 10 pounds can be lost in a week, but this is not elaborated on or mentioned within later sections. It is generally concise, but the part about the amount of weight lost would probably fit better in the background section.
The content of the article seems to be up-to-date in content, but it could use more information on the origins of the diet, or possibly it's resurgence in more recent years.
This article represents this diet in a negative light; there is only a section on criticisms but no section on support. It also says the diet is "radical", and makes the assumption that the recipe used for the diet is "bland" and potentially nauseating.
There are only four references for the article, and I think it needs more. As previously mentioned, the negative comments about the diet such as "bland", "nauseating", and "causing weakness and light-headedness" do not have a source. However, the few references that are available seem to be diverse. They include a chapter from a book, a newspaper article, and two websites. There is likely more research to be found on this topic.
The article is well-written, does not seem to have any grammatical errors, is well organized, and is easy to read.
The only image for this article is a photo of cabbage soup captioned as "cabbage soup". I think this adds some life into the already short article, even if it may be a bit redundant or unnecessary.
There are no discussions on this article's talk page, but it is part of two WikiProjects, "Food and Drink" and "Vegetarianism and Veganism". It's considered start-class and low-importance in both.
Overall I think this article could use a bit more information about the origins of the Cabbage soup diet, a section about support for the diet, a wider variety and amount of references, and a more neutral tone.