User:AnoNematoad/Evaluate an Article
 | Evaluate an article
Complete your article evaluation below. Here are the key aspects to consider: Lead sectionA good lead section defines the topic and provides a concise overview. A reader who just wants to identify the topic can read the first sentence. A reader who wants a very brief overview of the most important things about it can read the first paragraph. A reader who wants a quick overview can read the whole lead section.
ContentA good Wikipedia article should cover all the important aspects of a topic, without putting too much weight on one part while neglecting another.
Tone and BalanceWikipedia articles should be written from a neutral point of view; if there are substantial differences of interpretation or controversies among published, reliable sources, those views should be described as fairly as possible.
Sources and ReferencesA Wikipedia article should be based on the best sources available for the topic at hand. When possible, this means academic and peer-reviewed publications or scholarly books.
Organization and writing qualityThe writing should be clear and professional, the content should be organized sensibly into sections.
Images and Media
Talk page discussionThe article's talk page — and any discussions among other Wikipedia editors that have been taking place there — can be a useful window into the state of an article, and might help you focus on important aspects that you didn't think of.
Overall impressions
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved. |
Which article are you evaluating?
[edit]Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
[edit]I chose this article because I like learning about different kinds of infections, their causes, and treatments. This article is important because it can serve to educate many people and hopefully inspire them to take a preventative approach to tackling illnesses. My preliminary impression was that it had good structure overall but many things seemed repetitive throughout and some of the headings aren't fleshed out enough. I feel like it will take a while to get this page right but luckily sources shouldn't be too hard to find for this kind of topic.
GOOD THOUGHTS.
Evaluate the article
[edit]Lead Section
The lead section provides a decent understanding of the topic. It begins with a clear introductory sentence that defines opportunistic infections. This opening is effective in immediately establishing the point of the article. It also gives a brief overview of the conditions under which opportunistic infections arise, such as weakened immune systems, immunosuppressive drug treatments, altered microbiomes, and breached integumentary barriers. The lead touches on the idea that some of these pathogens can be present without causing symptoms until an imbalance in the immune system occurs. However, this section could be improved by briefly mentioning that prevention and treatment are discussed in the article. Overall, the lead is relatively concise and does not contain information that is not present in the rest of the article.
Content
The content of the article is broadly relevant to the topic of opportunistic infections. It covers a wide range of opportunistic pathogens, including bacteria, fungi, parasites, and viruses, and lists the pathologies associated with them. The article provides a good overview of various factors that can cause immunodeficiency or immunosuppression, such as malnutrition, fatigue, advanced HIV infection, chemotherapy, and antibiotic treatments. It details the correlation between HIV and the increased risk of opportunistic infections, as well as the importance of antiretroviral therapy. The article also discusses preventative measures, including the restoration of the immune system, avoiding exposure to infectious agents, and prophylactic medications. Although the article covers a wide range of pathogens, it could be enhanced by going into more detail regarding the specific mechanisms of action and pathogenesis of these infections. It would also be beneficial to have information regarding the incidence and prevalence of these infections, particularly in relation to specific risk factors. GOOD SUGGESTIONS
Tone and Balance
The article maintains a neutral tone throughout, presenting information factually and without any apparent bias. It provides information on a wide variety of opportunistic infections, risk factors, and treatments, without favoring one particular viewpoint. It accurately portrays the serious nature of these infections without being overly alarmist, instead, focusing on prevention and treatment strategies. The various opportunistic pathogens are given similar levels of attention, and the article does not attempt to persuade toward any specific position. While some infections such as those related to HIV, receive more emphasis because they are a leading cause of mortality, this is appropriate considering the gravity of the issue.
Sources and References
The article relies on many sources, citing both academic and peer-reviewed publications and scholarly resources. The sources cited appear to be generally current, with many publications from the last decade and some more recent publications, suggesting that the article reflects recent advancements in knowledge. However, a few sources appear to be older and could be updated for the most current understanding. YES! The article also utilizes a variety of sources which include medical journals, clinical guidelines, and book chapters. A strength of the sources is that they are mostly peer-reviewed academic and medical resources, which generally provide high-quality information. It's hard to determine if the sources are written by a diverse spectrum of authors, but the variety of the journals and books suggests an attempt to represent diverse perspectives. All the links to the references appear to be functional.GOOD.
Organization and Writing Quality
The article is well-organized, with sections that clearly outline the major aspects of opportunistic infections. It starts with an introduction, then moves into specific pathogens, then causes, prevention, and finally treatment. I think the use of headings and subheadings aids in the flow and readability of the article. The writing is concise and easy to read, using clear language. I see very few grammatical errors. YES, WIKIPEDIA LIKES HEADINGS
Images and Media
The article includes one image, a chest X-ray of a patient with Haemophilus influenzae pneumonia. The caption is concise and directly related to the topic, indicating that the pneumonia was presumably opportunistic after a patient first had influenza. Although the provided image is useful, it may improve understanding of other concepts by including additional images of the pathogens themselves, or graphical depictions of the mechanisms of the disease and how it affects patients. The image adheres to copyright regulations because it is a public domain image. The image is also well laid out.
Overall Impression
Overall, the article is well-developed and provides a comprehensive overview of the topic. The article's strengths lie in its clear organization, neutral tone, use of reliable sources, and thoroughness in covering a wide variety of opportunistic pathogens. It is clear that it was crafted with the intention of educating a wide audience about the seriousness of opportunistic infections. The primary area for improvement would be enhancing the lead section to briefly mention the discussion of prevention and treatment within the article. Adding more details on pathogenesis, incidence, and prevalence of various opportunistic infections, along with additional images or graphics, will also enhance the overall quality. Additionally, older references could be updated with more recent information. Despite these areas for improvement, the article provides an informative and reliable resource.
OK, NICE ASSESSMENT