the assertion itself is not untrue; what is untrue is the fact that it brought about Romania's rule over Transylvania; what did bring about Romania's rule over Transylvania was the Treaty of Trianon, as the text currently makes clear
its relevance was rejected by the Romanian government of the times, and it only surfaced as a "meaningful gesture" in context after the actual decision from above became unfashionable (namely, in Communist Romania)
Criztu fails to note that "Romanians taking control of the administration" is not at all equal to "Romania taking control of the administration"; the matter of sovereignty did not at all reside there, and all knots were tied after Trianon, not before
it is adequately presented, with adequate commentary, on relevant pages, and certainly does not belong in the lead
