Template talk:User rights

Template:User rights is permanently protected from editing as it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's documentation to add usage notes or categories.

Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. Functionality of the template can be checked using test cases.

Template-protected edit request on 5 July 2019

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Currently, this template produces userboxes in which the image has a different gray background than the text. I think it would look better if the colors were matched, so that the image background is the same as the text background. Sdkb (talk) 03:47, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{edit template-protected}} template. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:34, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Formatting proposal

Currently, this template produces userboxes in which the image has a different gray background than the text. I think it would look better if the colors were matched, so that the image background is the same as the text background. Do others agree? - Sdkb (talk) 17:21, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think it actually looks fine the way it is, coordinated colours. - Ahunt (talk) 17:49, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template-protected edit request on 5 July 2019

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Code in sandbox: Special:Diff/904939078/904939221

Add parameter "id-c" to customize color of the left box—for User:Sdkb
Add alias "info-s" for "info-size"—for consistency with Template:Userbox —⁠andrybak (talk) 17:33, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done — xaosflux ^Talk 13:31, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template-protected edit request on 3 March 2022

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

has '''{{{rights}}}''' rights → has {{#ifeq:{{yesno-no|{{{temporary|}}}}}|yes|temporary{{sp}}|}}'''{{{rights}}}''' rights. Already tested in it's sandbox.

Adds the word "temporary" before the right name when temporary is set to yes, y, or other positive value. ---CX Zoom(^he/_him) (^{let's talk}|_contribs) 17:40, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done. P.I. Ellsworth - ed. ^put'r there 03:07, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template-protected edit request on 21 July 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

has '''&limit=1''' → has '''&limit=20'''. The verify link with &limit=1 does not work, since the minimum allowed limit value for Special:ListUsers search form is 20. ―Applsdev (talk) (contribs) 16:01, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. &limit=1 does work. Contrast the following:

SilverLocust 💬 11:29, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template-protected edit request on 18 September 2025

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Remove the }}<includeonly> I don't know about this type of stuff but could be caused by this edit. --pro-anti-air _{ping me for template replies} 03:31, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thanks for noticing this one. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:34, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

15 months later.....

Thanks for accepting so fast! I guess template editor requests are less backlogged. --pro-anti-air _{ping me for template replies} 22:55, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]