Jump to content

Template talk:Discrimination

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Anti-Zionism/Edit Request

[edit]

It's ludicrous that Anti-Zionism is on the list when Zionism isn't. The article on Anti-Zionism calls it 'a heterogenous phenomenon' and the suggestion it is discriminatory is at the very least highly contentious and perhaps even illogical. Who is being discriminated against here, particularly when there are many Jewish people who would consider themselves opposed to Zionism? To mention this as discrimination and not do the same for Zionism itself, when the violently discriminatory consequences of that particular ideology are there for all to see, is outrageous, and it harms the credibility of Wikipedia. Please remove Anti-Zionism from this list, as it is the most non-contentious way of resolving this. 2A02:8084:4F41:B700:9DE5:F143:938C:5C9 (talk) 12:04, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In this edit [1] @Helper201 removed Anti-Zionism and added Zionism. I don’t have much argument with removing Anti-Zionism, but are we really sure that Zionism belongs here in its place? — HTGS (talk) 04:21, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think Zionism should be here.

[edit]

The ADL has already accused us of an anti-Israel bias, so, should we even include Zionism here? An editor from Mars (talk) 08:14, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Click the link. It's mainly about religiously anti­semitic Christian Zionists. It's not calling all forms of Zionism discriminatory in Wikipedia's voice, though I can see how you might interpret it that way at first glance. Does that help? Or answer your question?
P.S. I don't think we should necessarily let accusations drive our priorities. To do so would arguably give accusers more power to influence the project and thus incentivize further accusations.
1101 (talk) 10:56, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]